Set dafault value of 'Requirement Method Enum Id' drop down during 'create
new product store' in catalog.
-
Key: OFBIZ-2476
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arun Patidar updated OFBIZ-2476:
Attachment: setDefaultRequirementEnumId.patch
Here is the patch for this improvements.
Set
What would this be helpful for ?
Have you an idea in mind ?
Jacques
From: Shi Yusen sh...@langhua.cn
I deployed the OFBiz 09.04 jars and sources.jars to
http://maven2.langhua.org/public/ofbiz/
If you find anything wrong or missing, please feedback to me.
Have a nice weekend,
Shi
From what I picked up in a lot of cases a some of developers are trying
not use ofbiz as it was intended, especially at the UI level.
Yes, the fact valid status change is not used does concern me, however I
have not come up with a way to validate the code flow should or does use
valid status
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709781#action_12709781
]
Vikas Mayur commented on OFBIZ-2407:
Thanks Akash,
Few more suggestions on the code.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709782#action_12709782
]
Vikas Mayur commented on OFBIZ-2407:
Use the title attribute in
{code}
+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709783#action_12709783
]
Vikas Mayur commented on OFBIZ-2407:
Why not use the complete variable name so that
What could be very interesting would be to add new language to OfBiz. It
could be some 4GL which would
bring many interesting features:
First it could be service writing languge. It could be static language which
would make it types based on entities
and services (maybe services could be more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Mayur closed OFBIZ-2464.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Mukesh and others,
Mukesh your patch with slight changes is in trunk rev.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vivek Mishra updated OFBIZ-2465:
Attachment: SortExistingBillingAccountOnAccounting_OFBIZ-2465.patch
Forgot to put extension on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Mayur closed OFBIZ-2476.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Assignee: Vikas Mayur
Thanks Arun,
Your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Akash Jain updated OFBIZ-2407:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-2407.patch
Thanks Vikas for your comments. I have done the following changes as per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Mayur closed OFBIZ-2465.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Vikas Mayur
Thanks Vivek,
Your patch is in trunk rev. 775104.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709822#action_12709822
]
Vivek Mishra commented on OFBIZ-2465:
-
Thanks Vikas
--Vivek
Sort the existing
Why is this option better than others as the default? Going a little
further, why would any default value be better than no value (ie so
requirements are not automatically created)?
-David
On May 15, 2009, at 6:05 AM, m...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mor
Date: Fri May 15 12:05:05 2009
Add filter on find orders page.
Key: OFBIZ-2477
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2477
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: order
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
This is just a concept in my head, and I haven't looked into it in any detail,
so I might be missing something.
If a decorator's constructor took the singleton Delegator, a UserLogin
GenericValue, and one of the context Maps, then it would have the objects it
needs to do security checks and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709830#action_12709830
]
Vikas Mayur commented on OFBIZ-2407:
Thanks Akash,
Your patch is in trunk rev. 775128
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709833#action_12709833
]
Akash Jain commented on OFBIZ-2407:
---
Thanks Vikas :)
Regards
--
Akash Jain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709836#action_12709836
]
Jyotsna Rathore commented on OFBIZ-2474:
Thanks Hans for your comments, I am
I did not think far ahead and does not evaluated which option is
better than others or no value. Certainly options are kept default
with probably two reasons - widely used and often used.
It was just on purpose with a client requirement. I thought that doing
this will not do any harm but
Hi David, It makes a lot of sense to me now. Thanks for the details
and indeed this is much better approach. Reverted in revision 775144.
Vikas
On May 15, 2009, at 7:15 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Thanks Vikas. Why not just put the setting in your client's ext
data? Usually configurable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709849#action_12709849
]
Vikas Mayur commented on OFBIZ-2476:
This is reverted in rev. 775144 following David's
Add Shipping Address for an order that will add to the party
Key: OFBIZ-2478
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2478
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2407.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks, Pranay, Vikas, Akash,
I commited CommonUiLabels.xml at r775180
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709869#action_12709869
]
Vikas Mayur commented on OFBIZ-2407:
Thank you, Jacques!
Functionality for Weight
Thanks for continuing to push on this gentlemen - it's much appreciated.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
- David E Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
On a related note, instead of passing it around in the widget and
Well, maybe because we don't have unlimited resources to rewrite
*everything.* ;-)
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
On a related note, instead of passing it around in the widget and
service contexts why not change those APIs as well?
-David
On May 14, 2009, at 8:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
There are applications like Compiere that use this. so Why change ofbiz?
Also how about addressing some of the inherited features like UI and
DB(at least the adds) change when entities changes
Then there is the automatic Creation of CRUD services that get built
from the Entity.
Triggers are
messages are not showing in bluelight theme with IE6
Key: OFBIZ-2479
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2479
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: ALL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-2479:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-2479.patch
the patch
messages are not showing in bluelight theme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2479.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Erwan,
Your patch is in trunk at
David E Jones wrote:
I don't think there is a reason why we can't.
Why do a decorator object instead of just changing the GenericDelegator?
In order for this to do anything we'll have to change EVERY call to a
decorator method anyway...
Code shouldn't be using GenericDelegator. It should
Adam,
Thank you for pointing that out! That was the detail I was missing. Now I
understand what David was saying.
Wow. We really painted ourselves into a corner with that one.
We should change that - regardless of the security refactor.
-Adrian
--- On Fri, 5/15/09, Adam Heath
Its somewhat inconvenient that the display template of a blog entry is baked
into the story reference. It doesn't make sense at the design level because it
combines the model and the view. An obvious example of the shortcoming is if
you want to have the same story appear in several different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709979#action_12709979
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2469:
Hi Shi Yusen,
Please note that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709989#action_12709989
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-2469:
Using pixels in the FlatGrey theme is evil!
This is a continuation of the security refactoring discussion.
There is a Wiki page that outlines the design of Security-Aware Artifacts:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/Ch8
I started to build out the scenarios, so that we can be sure the design meets
everyone's needs as expected.
David - I'm not
Actually, we already have a 4GL - it's called mini-language.
To quote one of the project's founders (paraphrased) Understand the design
before you try to change it.
-Adrian
--- On Fri, 5/15/09, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net
Subject: Re: OfBiz
but don't let me stop you from developing it to show to the community.
:D
BJ Freeman sent the following on 5/15/2009 9:26 AM:
There are applications like Compiere that use this. so Why change ofbiz?
Also how about addressing some of the inherited features like UI and
DB(at least the adds)
40 matches
Mail list logo
