[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3446:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-3446_LayoutFix.patch
Hi Jacques,
i extend my previous patch.
color issuses
Sorry if I am hijacking this thread, but the more I think of it the more I
believe we should officially create an alpha release 10.04, instead of simply
creating a release candidate for 10.04.
In this way we will have two official current releases:
09.04 Stable Release
10.04 Alpha Release
On Apr 13, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Sorry if I am hijacking this thread, but the more I think of it the more I
believe we should officially create an alpha release 10.04, instead of
simply creating a release candidate for 10.04.
In this way we will have two official
Hi Jacopo,
What exactly does it mean to create an alpha release, compared to what we
have now where we create a release branch?
Thanks
Scott
On 13/04/2010, at 8:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Sorry if I am hijacking this thread, but the more I think of it the more I
believe we should
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
What exactly does it mean to create an alpha release, compared to what we
have now where we create a release branch?
It fundamentally means that we can distribute it outside of the inner group of
contributors because the we can
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
What exactly does it mean to create an alpha release, compared to what we
have now where we create a release branch?
It fundamentally means that we can distribute it
Jacques,
I am going to create the tag for the release 09.04 before this bug fix: this
means that the bug fix will not be included in the official release but of
course it will be part of the next bug fix release for 09.04, if it will be
released (as 09.04.1?).
I am sorry but the package with
On 13/04/2010, at 9:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
What exactly does it mean to create an alpha release, compared to what we
have now where we create a release branch?
It fundamentally means that we can distribute it outside
On 13/04/2010, at 9:41 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
What exactly does it mean to create an alpha release, compared to what we
have now where we create a release branch?
Hi Jacopo,
No problems, 09.04.1 sounds good to me, thanks for the information
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com
Jacques,
I am going to create the tag for the release 09.04 before this bug fix: this means that the bug fix will not be included in the
official release
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 9:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
What exactly does it mean to create an alpha release, compared to what we
have now where we create a release branch?
It
here here.
This is my approach every time with a client. I find it helps them
understand their own business as well as how ofbiz can help.
I get their story of how they do business before implementing ofbiz.
We sometimes discuss how they do business now, before ofbiz could be
changed to help the
The vote has passed with the following result:
binding +1 votes: 9 (Adrian Crum, Anil Patel, Bruno Busco, Ashish Vijaywargiya,
Jacques Le Roux, Adam Heath, Bilgin Ibryam, Jacopo Cappellato, Scott Gray)
non binding +1 votes: 8 (Bob Morley, Marco Risaliti, Erwan de Ferrieres, Bj
Freeman, Tim
alpha on other teams I have been on has also included filling out a feature.
Alpha meant changes to module already implemented for functionality of
the design that was missing.
the numbering was the level of change to the code. the further the
.x.x.x the less of a change to the code.
On 13/04/2010, at 10:21 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 9:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
What exactly does it mean to create an alpha release, compared to what
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 10:21 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 9:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
What exactly does
Thanks for all your work on this Jacopo.
Jacques
From: jaco...@apache.org
Author: jacopoc
Date: Tue Apr 13 11:12:54 2010
New Revision: 933552
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933552view=rev
Log:
Tag release 09.04.
The release has been created from the branch release09.04 (revision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-3665.
Resolution: Fixed
933573
Main page cleanup: removed partial list of sites/products
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856416#action_12856416
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3446:
Thanks Sascha,
I confirm there no longer
Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 10:21 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 9:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
What exactly does it mean to create an alpha release,
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 10:21 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 9:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
What exactly does
On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 10:21 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 9:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 10:21 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 9:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-3586:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-3586_ResolveWarningsManufacturing.patch
Rather large set of changes here; typically
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com
On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/04/2010, at 10:21 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Scott Gray
Pass Accounting label to Common Label
-
Key: OFBIZ-3694
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3694
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: accounting, framework
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
nicolas malin updated OFBIZ-3694:
-
Attachment: accountingToCommonLabel.patch
Pass Accounting label to Common Label
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES reassigned OFBIZ-3694:
-
Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES
Pass Accounting label to Common Label
We have just started to make use of ProductionRun in our project and we were
having a problem in the create because the ProductionRunServices (around
line 274) makes a call to createWorkEffort using a quantityToProduce
that is a BigDecimal. The field on the WorkEffort entity is actually a
Hi,
The description for the field canclAutmExtTimeUomId in
ProductSubscriptionResource is invalid :
field name=canclAutmExtTimeUomId type=iddescriptionIf this
flag is set to 'Y' the subscription will be extended at the end of the
subscription period with a new order./description/field
The field
When an order item is created for a Purchase Order, its' description
is set to ${supplierProductId} - ${supplierProductName}.
When talking to external systems and when creating custom PDFs, I need
to access these values separately. Right now I use two order item
attributes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856563#action_12856563
]
nicolas malin commented on OFBIZ-3647:
--
To Hans :
The persistContentAndAssoc service
Data model book Vol I page 126 calls out an PO Item and a Salesorder item.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93
Specialtymarket.com
Firstly and without verifying, the automatic conversion sounds wrong and yes
I'm quite sure it intentional never used to be that way.
Secondly, I'm not sure why quantityToProduce is a floating point instead of a
fixed point data type. I'm surprised and can't imagine why I skipped these
when I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856595#action_12856595
]
Bob Morley commented on OFBIZ-3586:
---
Please hold off on this one -- I attached the patch
Hi Joe,
It looks like you've just changed a default that could already be overridden by
setting an attribute on the cart. Could you explain a little more?
Thanks
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 14/04/2010, at 7:43 AM, eckar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: eckardjf
Date: Tue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-3586:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-3586_ResolveWarningsManufacturing.patch
Corrected patch.
application -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-3586:
--
Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3586_ResolveWarningsManufacturing.patch)
application - manufacturing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856643#action_12856643
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3424:
---
I was going to test this on centos 5.4
I notice that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman closed OFBIZ-3490.
-
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Resolution: Fixed
I see a create-theme in the build
can not find the
Scott Gray-2 wrote:
Firstly and without verifying, the automatic conversion sounds wrong and
yes I'm quite sure it intentional never used to be that way.
Secondly, I'm not sure why quantityToProduce is a floating point instead
of a fixed point data type. I'm surprised and can't imagine
also
Data model book Vol I
Page 107 calls out sales order line item and purchase order line item as
reveferencing the Product.
you will note on page 82 that the supplierProduct does not cover a
product but additional information related to the supplier. However
ofbiz has information in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856675#action_12856675
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3633:
---
Bob
the pages you refer to are for company to
Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 09/04/2010 18:05, Adam Heath a écrit :
Can we all try to start upgrading any of our embedded libraries to the
latest official releases(or some svn snapshot), before the next
release branch is created?
If a library we use requires a version that hasn't been
open symphony work flow in ofbiz
-
Key: OFBIZ-3695
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3695
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: humanres
Affects Versions: Release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-3695.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Please use the user mailing list for such questions
open symphony work flow in
order Requirment
Key: OFBIZ-3696
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3696
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: order
Affects Versions: Release Branch 4.0
Environment: win xp , jdk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856745#action_12856745
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya commented on OFBIZ-3695:
For more details on Mailing list
I notice is says an 1.6 or later.
Since ofbiz ant script uses its own version of ant and the
trunk is currently using 1.7.2
should we distinguish between the 9.04 (1.6) and trunk (1.7.2) in the
setup, or put in instructions how to upgrade ant for 9.04 in ofbiz?
i say this because those that use
Could you please help to get a summary of the issues that we see after the
migration to our Confluence spaces to ASF Infra?
The main ones I see are:
1) we need a custom header (with navigation links) similar to the one we have
on our site home page
2) the search box in Confluence should search
50 matches
Mail list logo
