[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3852:
--
Description:
I have many subtask under this one related to
the goal is to allow a business to use the d
I don't see a huge problem with your change but I have to admit that I don't
remember what your change actually does. There is a reason why I don't
remember though, because it isn't intuitive.
With the way things were before, it was easy to understand:
context overrides web.xml overrides widget
You still not give me a business reason why the change i did was harmful
or break anything.
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 17:02 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
> On 10/07/2010, at 4:00 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
>
> > Before also true could be overridden which was painfully shown in the
> > example component not sh
On 10/07/2010, at 4:00 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> Before also true could be overridden which was painfully shown in the
> example component not showing comments. I see no valid business reason
> why we should have that.
Let's be clear, there was no problem with the way it worked before, changing
t
Adam,
if this would be the first time i talk to Adrian, I agree you were
right, however this discussion has a long history with other
discussions, i tried your approach many times, but i cannot get Adrian
to answer simple questions on the business level. Technically no
problem, very good to have A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12886988#action_12886988
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3852:
---
thank you for your input.
did not plan on more at th
Hans Bakker wrote:
> Adrian.
>
> This is the second time you do not reply to what I write.
This is not helpful. If you believe someone hasn't understood what
you have said, then don't just respond saying that you didn't
understand. You should re-explain it in a different way. If there
was unde
Adrian.
This is the second time you do not reply to what I write.
so no use sending you more arguments.
I will not revert my changes, of the reasons i gave you.
Regards,
Hans
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 07:19 -0700, Adrian Crum wrote:
> Hans,
>
> My behavior is not the issue. You made a change that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3851:
--
Parent: OFBIZ-3852
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
> this is the main Jira for empleme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3851:
--
Parent: (was: OFBIZ-3825)
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Sub-task)
> this is the main Jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3836:
--
Parent: OFBIZ-3852
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug)
> partybenifits leaves out using parytyrela
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3836:
--
Parent: (was: OFBIZ-3825)
Issue Type: Bug (was: Sub-task)
> partybenifits leaves out using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12886973#action_12886973
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3852:
---
For a branch you first need people to collaborate wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3836:
--
Parent: OFBIZ-3825
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
> partybenifits leaves out using pa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12886968#action_12886968
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3852:
---
this would be easier if done in a branch.
> This i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3851:
--
Parent: OFBIZ-3825
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: New Feature)
> this is the main Jira for empleme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3852:
--
Original Estimate: 6048h (was: 0.15h)
Remaining Estimate: 6048h (was: 0.15h)
meant months not m
This is the main Jira for doing business plan jusing the Datamodel Book.
--
Key: OFBIZ-3852
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3852
Project: OFBiz
Issue
Adrian Crum wrote:
> It's unfortunate that anyone in the community should feel the need to
> avoid taking sides. From my perspective, there are no "sides" in this
> discussion. I am simply trying to educate a fellow committer on the
> design of a piece of code I authored. In addition, I'm also tryi
On 7/9/2010 8:32 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 7/9/2010 7:00 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
BJ Freeman wrote:
I would like to see one place that enables them all
but if that is not enabled then web.xml would.
with as many components(over 30) I have I would like the all function.
I haven
Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 7/9/2010 7:00 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
>> BJ Freeman wrote:
>>> I would like to see one place that enables them all
>>> but if that is not enabled then web.xml would.
>>> with as many components(over 30) I have I would like the all function.
>>
>> I haven't looked at at any of
Please detail how do I change the definition of an attribute used in XML.
For example..
If I want to change the definition of required field for appending a star
"*" in the left hand side as * Title instead of Title *.
Please explain the same with an example.
Thanks in advance :)
--
View this
On 7/9/2010 7:00 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
BJ Freeman wrote:
I would like to see one place that enables them all
but if that is not enabled then web.xml would.
with as many components(over 30) I have I would like the all function.
I haven't looked at at any of the code, but what you guys want here
Hans,
My behavior is not the issue. You made a change that wasn't necessary. I
have tried to explain that to you, but you refuse to listen. Instead,
you issue threats and insults.
The context has nothing to do with the problem you encountered. It was a
configuration error in your local copy
this is the main Jira for emplementing the partyRelationship as defined in Data
model book
--
Key: OFBIZ-3851
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851
BJ Freeman wrote:
> I would like to see one place that enables them all
> but if that is not enabled then web.xml would.
> with as many components(over 30) I have I would like the all function.
I haven't looked at at any of the code, but what you guys want here is
boolean logic with tri-states.
i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-3842:
--
Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES
> Security Update for forgotten passwords
> --
I would like to see one place that enables them all
but if that is not enabled then web.xml would.
with as many components(over 30) I have I would like the all function.
Hans Bakker sent the following on 7/9/2010 12:22 AM:
That is exactly what my change is doing,
only let the context override wh
That is exactly what my change is doing,
only let the context override when the widget.properties parameter is
false: no widget comments unless enabled over web.xml
Regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 23:56 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
> I can think of one.
> adding new components to a production sit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12886636#action_12886636
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3842:
Hey,
did nobody have a comment to this pat
I am sorry Adrian,
this is a perfect example of your behavior.
This was a request in 2007. introducing widget comments, an excellent
request. How can it be, you added this context stuff on may 20 2010?
Even on the original request people do not want the web.xml
configuration.
Whatever it is:
if w
Jep Scott after you created the branch we maybe can split the tasks and plan
the next steps.
2010/7/8 Scott Gray
> Okay well cool, I'll go ahead and create a branch at some point, I know
> Sascha has expressed interest as well so we may as well get the ball
> rolling.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On
32 matches
Mail list logo
