Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-16 Thread Jacques Le Roux
re ? > > > > This tool was used by Eclipse project when they changed licence > > from 2.1 o 3.1. > > > > Jacques > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: > &

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-16 Thread David E. Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:10 PM Subject: Re: Copyright Statement Eclipse "Fix copyright" option workss well but only on java and properties files. I will revert and try the batch now. Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-16 Thread Jacques Le Roux
ed licence from 2.1 o 3.1. Jacques - Original Message - From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:10 PM Subject: Re: Copyright Statement > Eclipse "Fix copyright" option workss well but only on java and properti

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-16 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Eclipse "Fix copyright" option workss well but only on java and properties files. I will revert and try the batch now. Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > David, > > From: "David E. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > On Jan 15, 2007, at 8:41 PM, Chris Howe wrote: > > > > > Tha

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-16 Thread Jacques Le Roux
David, From: "David E. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Jan 15, 2007, at 8:41 PM, Chris Howe wrote: > > > Thanks J Aaron! > > > > David, as per that link, should we make a JIRA issue > > to remove the copyright notice from the source > > headers? > > Interesting... it looks like that page has cha

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-15 Thread Daniel Kunkel
The easy answer... Whatever people want to share. The longer answer: - New apps - very specialized apps - examples - works in progress Whatever people are working on that they want to share. I think the biggest thing that will happen is that many of the developers on the fringe will finally

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-15 Thread David E. Jones
What kind of stuff do you imagine going into such a sandbox? -David On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:42 PM, Daniel Kunkel wrote: David I'd like to give one more try at seeing if we can set something up WITH- IN the Apache OFBiz Project for sandboxed developments and developers. Chris seems to be r

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-15 Thread Chris Howe
+1 :-) --- Daniel Kunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David > > I'd like to give one more try at seeing if we can > set something up WITH- > IN the Apache OFBiz Project for sandboxed > developments and developers. > > Chris seems to be really working to create something > that he, I and > probab

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-15 Thread Daniel Kunkel
David I'd like to give one more try at seeing if we can set something up WITH- IN the Apache OFBiz Project for sandboxed developments and developers. Chris seems to be really working to create something that he, I and probably others feel is really needed. These legal challenges he is facing in t

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-15 Thread David E. Jones
On Jan 15, 2007, at 8:41 PM, Chris Howe wrote: Thanks J Aaron! David, as per that link, should we make a JIRA issue to remove the copyright notice from the source headers? Interesting... it looks like that page has changed since our pre- graduation review was done a few months ago. And ye

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-15 Thread David E. Jones
Chris, Hopefully the resource J. Aaron linked to answers your question about copyrights. Note that in that same area of the site there are various pages with helpful related information. The comments from Leo Simmons on the incubator mailing list were helpful too. As I understand it ho

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-15 Thread Chris Howe
Thanks J Aaron! David, as per that link, should we make a JIRA issue to remove the copyright notice from the source headers? I guess I'm still in search of a suitable model for the sandbox. The closest thing I have is to have contributors sign an individual and collective grant, but I still do

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-15 Thread J Aaron Farr
Chris Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Can you point me to a definitive place for this > answer? http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html -- jaaron

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-14 Thread Chris Howe
David, Let me know at which point I become a pain in my inquiry about this. It's really not my intention. I'm still looking for a model that I can use to offer contributions with the least amount of administrative work necessary from the sandbox to the ASF. Copying the manner that OFBiz is able

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-14 Thread David E. Jones
Chris, Do you mean the NOTICE and LICENSE files in OFBiz? You'll only find information on libraries included and their corresponding licenses in those files. I recommend looking on the apache.org site for general information about the ASF and its policies. -David On Jan 14, 2007, at

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-14 Thread Chris Howe
David, Can you point me to where the copyright policy addresses the contributors as being the copyright holders for the OFBiz code instead of ASF?I'm not seeing them in NOTICE or LICENSE, but they are rather long :-) TIA, Chris --- "David E. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chris, > >

Re: Copyright Statement

2007-01-14 Thread David E. Jones
Chris, Have you read the ASF licensing and copyright policy documents? They address this, and in general this sort of thing in pretty good detail. Don't worry, you're not the first to notice this. As for copyright statements in other projects: there are certain cases where the files are n

Copyright Statement

2007-01-14 Thread Chris Howe
While searching for more answers on how to make the ofbiz-sandbox ASF friendly (both legally and ASF administrative safe guard wise), I came across a distinction between contributions to the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and contributions to the ASF that I think may have been inadequately addresse