Le 16/03/2012 18:03, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Thanks for all the comments; but I actually didn't want to fall again in the
never ending story about what we think the perfect applications should look
like: it is way too abstract topic, there are so many different opinions and it
has been
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Rethinking the structure of the OFBiz Applications
Components
Hi Adrian,
Could you list the applications you comment out in your production
implementations? I think that would help creating insight.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 14
Le 14/03/2012 23:04, Tom Burns a écrit :
I see these applications as falling into two categories. Applications
that are common to most businesses and domain specific applications. This
follows the pattern laid out in the two DMR Books. The former, more general,
category should get the most
the structure of the OFBiz Applications Components
Hi Adrian,
Could you list the applications you comment out in your production
implementations? I think that would help creating insight.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 14 maart 2012 18:33 schreef Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.comhet volgende
From: Nicolas Malinmalin.nico...@librenberry.net
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: Rethinking the structure of the OFBiz Applications Components
Hi,
At this time, applications components embedded functional framework
of the OFBiz Applications
Components
Hi Adrian,
Could you list the applications you comment out in your production
implementations? I think that would help creating insight.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 14 maart 2012 18:33 schreef Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com het volgende:
Understood
comments are in-line
Le 14/03/2012 18:22, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Thank you Adrian.
Just to clarify that I was not talking about the architecture of the framework (topic for
another day) but only for the layout of the applications and it is not based on what I
think it is best in general
comments are in-line
Le 14/03/2012 19:34, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Mar 14, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Understood.
As a service provider, I regularly comment out unused applications
I would be interested to know what are the applications under the
applications folder that
with Human Resources. Is anyone interested?
Tom
From: Pierre Smitspierre.sm...@gmail.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Rethinking the structure of the OFBiz Applications Components
Hi Adrian,
Could you list
of the customization
needs.
Tom
From: Nicolas Malinmalin.nico...@librenberry.net
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: Rethinking the structure of the OFBiz Applications Components
Hi,
At this time, applications
. Is anyone interested?
Tom
From: Pierre Smitspierre.sm...@gmail.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Rethinking the structure of the OFBiz Applications Components
Hi Adrian,
Could you list the applications you comment out
the structure of the OFBiz Applications Components
Hi,
At this time, applications components embedded functional framework and
business oriented (massively B2C) and aren't user friendly.
I possible solution will be have a dedicate application components for only
Consultant or high level user
with Human Resources. Is anyone interested?
Tom
From: Pierre Smitspierre.sm...@gmail.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Rethinking the structure of the OFBiz Applications Components
Hi Adrian,
Could you
In the eraly days of the project, the OFBiz applications have been designed as
independent components to make them more reusable and because they were
designed to be a set of reusable and generic artifacts, each of them based on a
specific domain of the data model (order, party, product
That approach sounds very monolithic, and I tend to avoid monoliths.
I gave this subject a lot of thought about a year ago when I was working
on a vision for a new framework
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Another+Framework+Vision).
In particular, I was trying to devise
Thank you Adrian.
Just to clarify that I was not talking about the architecture of the framework
(topic for another day) but only for the layout of the applications and it is
not based on what I think it is best in general but instead about what I think
it is best to represent what we have
Understood.
As a service provider, I regularly comment out unused applications and
build hot-deploy components to replace OOTB OFBiz components. I override
service definitions, redefine entity definitions, etc - all in an effort
to take what's good in OFBiz, and replace what's not-so-good. I
On Mar 14, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Understood.
As a service provider, I regularly comment out unused applications
I would be interested to know what are the applications under the
applications folder that you comment out: do you you mean web applications,
not component
and
Hi Adrian,
Could you list the applications you comment out in your production
implementations? I think that would help creating insight.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 14 maart 2012 18:33 schreef Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com het volgende:
Understood.
As a service provider, I
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Rethinking the structure of the OFBiz Applications Components
Hi Adrian,
Could you list the applications you comment out in your production
implementations? I think that would
with Human Resources. Is anyone interested?
Tom
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Rethinking the structure of the OFBiz Applications Components
Hi Adrian,
Could you list
21 matches
Mail list logo
