Re: svn commit: r1758700 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/lib/ applications/datamodel/ applications/manufacturing/ specialpurpose/assetmaint/ specialpurpose/birt/ sp

OK we can also add the ASL2 headers to all our readme files, not a problem with me Jacques Le 01/09/2016 à 12:34, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: ... Wait, I don't want a different license header in readme

Re: svn commit: r1758700 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/lib/ applications/datamodel/ applications/manufacturing/ specialpurpose/assetmaint/ specialpurpose/birt/ sp

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > ... > Wait, I don't want a different license header in readme files (w/ or w/o > suffixes) > I just want things to be consistent. Which resumes to no header at all in > those files, Consistency can be

Re: svn commit: r1758700 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/lib/ applications/datamodel/ applications/manufacturing/ specialpurpose/assetmaint/ specialpurpose/birt/ sp

Le 01/09/2016 à 11:33, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: So we don't apply a lazy consensus here and we need a vote? Why not follow the advice in this page? My suggestion is to go in one of the following two

Re: svn commit: r1758700 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/lib/ applications/datamodel/ applications/manufacturing/ specialpurpose/assetmaint/ specialpurpose/birt/ sp

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > So we don't apply a lazy consensus here and we need a vote? Why not follow > the advice in this page? > My suggestion is to go in one of the following two directions: 1) apply the standard license header to

Re: svn commit: r1758700 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/lib/ applications/datamodel/ applications/manufacturing/ specialpurpose/assetmaint/ specialpurpose/birt/ sp

I still don't see where the consensus was reached: discussions in Jira are not the same as discussion on the dev list (which is mentioned by Jacques in "as per consensus in dev mail thread"). Also the conversation between Jacques and Pierre in Jira is resolved with an unclear resolution to me. In

Re: svn commit: r1758700 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/lib/ applications/datamodel/ applications/manufacturing/ specialpurpose/assetmaint/ specialpurpose/birt/ sp

Actually I asked first whether there was consensus. And that was confirmed. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Jacques Le Roux <

Re: svn commit: r1758700 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/lib/ applications/datamodel/ applications/manufacturing/ specialpurpose/assetmaint/ specialpurpose/birt/ sp

Actually Pierre just followed http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions <> That seems OK with me Jacques Le 01/09/2016 à 08:36, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:53 AM, wrote: ... Legal statements are not required in readme files,

Re: svn commit: r1758700 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/accounting/ applications/accounting/lib/ applications/datamodel/ applications/manufacturing/ specialpurpose/assetmaint/ specialpurpose/birt/ sp

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:53 AM, wrote: > ... > Legal statements are not required in readme files, as per consensus in dev > mail thread with title 'Shorter ASL2 header in short files'. The mail > thread started here: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/pc5bzrsiupef7xjt > >