Re: svn commit: r564134 - /ofbiz/branches/release4.0/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/main.ftl

2007-08-10 Thread Adrian Crum
As a start, maybe you could write a testimonial that can be linked to from the home page. Walter Vaughan wrote: David E Jones wrote: I totally agree with you, we need a LOT of improvements in the marketing side of OFBiz. That just hasn't been something very many people have contributed to.

Re: svn commit: r564134 - /ofbiz/branches/release4.0/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/main.ftl

2007-08-10 Thread Walter Vaughan
David E Jones wrote: I totally agree with you, we need a LOT of improvements in the marketing side of OFBiz. That just hasn't been something very many people have contributed to. Because of the typical motivation of OFBiz users there is a lot of code moving around, but no central group to hel

Re: svn commit: r564134 - /ofbiz/branches/release4.0/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/main.ftl

2007-08-09 Thread David E Jones
Walter Vaughan wrote: David E Jones wrote: Walter Vaughan wrote: I think the word "dangerous" is slightly inflammatory. In what way? Could you be more specific? It's not like someone just slipped this in. It's been in OFBiz ever since I knew of the project... at least over a year. I think

Re: svn commit: r564134 - /ofbiz/branches/release4.0/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/main.ftl

2007-08-09 Thread Walter Vaughan
David E Jones wrote: Walter Vaughan wrote: I think the word "dangerous" is slightly inflammatory. In what way? Could you be more specific? It's not like someone just slipped this in. It's been in OFBiz ever since I knew of the project... at least over a year. I think of "dangerous precedent"

Re: svn commit: r564134 - /ofbiz/branches/release4.0/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/main.ftl

2007-08-09 Thread David E Jones
Walter Vaughan wrote: David E Jones wrote: I think this is the only link in the OFBiz applications that points to another open source project and services company. This is kind of a dangerous precedent. Before we kick off an official vote, any thoughts from anyone? I think the word "dan

Re: svn commit: r564134 - /ofbiz/branches/release4.0/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/main.ftl

2007-08-09 Thread Walter Vaughan
David E Jones wrote: I think this is the only link in the OFBiz applications that points to another open source project and services company. This is kind of a dangerous precedent. Before we kick off an official vote, any thoughts from anyone? I think the word "dangerous" is slightly infla

Re: svn commit: r564134 - /ofbiz/branches/release4.0/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/main.ftl

2007-08-09 Thread Scott Gray
No arguments here... Scott On 09/08/07, Jacques Le Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree that this should not be there > > Jacques > > De : "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I think this is the only link in the OFBiz applications that points to > another open source project and se

Re: svn commit: r564134 - /ofbiz/branches/release4.0/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/main.ftl

2007-08-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I agree that this should not be there Jacques De : "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think this is the only link in the OFBiz applications that points to > another open source project and services company. This is kind of a dangerous precedent. > > I'm thinking it's a good time to vote f

Re: svn commit: r564134 - /ofbiz/branches/release4.0/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/main.ftl

2007-08-09 Thread David E Jones
I think this is the only link in the OFBiz applications that points to another open source project and services company. This is kind of a dangerous precedent. I'm thinking it's a good time to vote for total removal of this from the code base. Before we kick off an official vote, any thoughts