Hello,
I still don't see from which page of tomee.apache.org this new page is
linked, if it is:
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html
I know for sure that it isn't directly linked from TomEE documentation page:
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/documentation.html
Don't
Hi,
i see it here http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html
btw i wonder if it should be under the documentation page because currently
documentation is more practise doc
we either need to split doc page in subitems IMO or put it elsewhere (maybe
support tab?)
wdyt?
*Romain Manni
Done.
Thanks Alex.
Jean-Louis
2013/1/6 Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.com
Hello,
Can this http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.htmlpage
be linked from official from TomEE documentation links page, if you all
agree about its content?
Alex
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013
Hello,
Can this http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html page
be linked from official from TomEE documentation links page, if you all
agree about its content?
Alex
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.comwrote:
@Jean-Louis;
How about
@Jean-Louis;
How about this page:
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html
Is it okay for you guys? can it be linked to official TomEE documentation ?
Alex.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
On Dec 30, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Romain
We cant use surefire 2.12.4 (dont run tests), 2.13 is fine
-- Message transféré --
De : andygumbre...@apache.org
Date : 2 janv. 2013 10:09
Objet : svn commit: r1427716 - in /openejb/trunk/openejb/tck:
bval-embedded/pom.xml bval-tomee/pom.xml cdi-embedded/pom.xml
cdi-tomee-embedded
Do we know why, is it a bug in surefire or our configuration?
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-svn-commit-r1427716-in-openejb-trunk-openejb-tck-bval-embedded-pom-xml-bval-tomee-pom-xml-cdi-eml-tp4660010p4660011.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list
-embedded-pom-xml-bval-tomee-pom-xml-cdi-eml-tp4660010p4660011.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi Alex,
You are all welcome to share your needs and what you expect (and also to
help if you can ;-)).
IMO, TomEE 1.x.y is only Java EE 6 dedicated.
The work on Java EE 7 will start Q2 2013 I guess or a bit after and it
should produce the 2.x.y of TomEE.
Java
Heard back from the ASF Board. Our TLP name is now officially Apache TomEE :)
Will follow up with Infra to see if it's at all possible to get
us...@tomee.apache.org etc.
-David
Adapters for TomEE support the following configuration
options in the arquillian.xml:
+All the Arquillian Adapters for TomEE support the following configuration
options in the arquillian.xml:
container qualifier=tomee default=true
configuration
](arquillian-getting-started.html) page if
you are not familiar with Arquillian.
-All the Aqruillian Adapters for TomEE support the following configuration
options in the arquillian.xml:
+All the Arquillian Adapters for TomEE support the following configuration
options in the arquillian.xml
(revision
1427260)
+++ trunk/content/arquillian-available-adapters.mdtext (working copy)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Check out the [Getting started](arquillian-getting-started.html) page if
you are not familiar with Arquillian.
-All the Aqruillian Adapters for TomEE support the following
are not familiar with Arquillian.
-All the Aqruillian Adapters for TomEE support the following
configuration
options in the arquillian.xml:
+All the Arquillian Adapters for TomEE support the following
configuration
options in the arquillian.xml:
container qualifier=tomee
started](arquillian-getting-started.html)
page if
you are not familiar with Arquillian.
-All the Aqruillian Adapters for TomEE support the following
configuration
options in the arquillian.xml:
+All the Arquillian Adapters for TomEE support the following
configuration
options
))
Then, you can navigate again to
http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html
Or any page you wanna update.
Finally, just click on the 'ASF CMS Edit' bookmark created in the first
step and that should work.
The top right blue pen is supposed to do the same.
There was a synchronization issue
into.
The first thing you can to do is to create a bookmark titled 'ASF CMS edit'
with the following content:
javascript:void(location.href='https://cms
.apache.org/redirect?uri='+escape(location.href))
Then, you can navigate again to
http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html
Or any page you
company: we're releasing a product
which we document that it is supported with Apache TomEE+ 1.5.x, x=1. The
rationale for allowing our customers to use an higher fix version is to
benefit from Apache Tomcat security fixes.
When our product was based on Apache Tomcat instead of TomEE we had the
same
Hi Alex,
You are all welcome to share your needs and what you expect (and also to
help if you can ;-)).
IMO, TomEE 1.x.y is only Java EE 6 dedicated.
The work on Java EE 7 will start Q2 2013 I guess or a bit after and it
should produce the 2.x.y of TomEE.
Java EE 8, dunno for the moment, maybe
Id like to break rest default config so 1.6 is better imo
Le 30 déc. 2012 21:34, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi Alex,
You are all welcome to share your needs and what you expect (and also to
help if you can ;-)).
IMO, TomEE 1.x.y is only Java EE 6 dedicated.
The work
Jean-Louis:
I wasn't very clear, sorry for that, but I think you got the idea :)
If I understand well your proposal of TomEE versioning, it would be x.y.z,
with x=1 for Java EE 6 ; and y moving when there are new features and z
moving for fixes.
Why not, but this is a little bit different from
and how you would get them proposed?
Just created a new page and committed it.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html
You can edit it and push a patch directly on the website using the top
right blue pen.
You don't need to be a committer.
Thanks in advance
JLouis
2012/12
to start pushing your understanding as you proposed
previously and how you would get them proposed?
Just created a new page and committed it.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html
You can edit it and push a patch directly on the website using the top
right blue pen
and committed it.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html
You can edit it and push a patch directly on the website using the top
right blue pen.
You don't need to be a committer.
Thanks in advance
JLouis
2012/12/30 Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.com
Jean-Louis
like to start pushing your understanding as you proposed
previously and how you would get them proposed?
Just created a new page and committed it.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html
You can edit it and push a patch directly on the website using the top
right
When I click 'No', I'm redirected to this location:
https://cms.apache.org/openejb/wc/browse/anonymous-sFLdJE/trunk/
and I don't see where I could edit the page about TomEE versions :(
Am I missing something?
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote
Committed.
On Dec 28, 2012, at 7:19 AM, Anonymous CMS User anonym...@apache.org wrote:
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://openejb.apache.org/tomee-mp-getting-started.mdtext
Index: trunk/content/tomee-mp-getting
Hi guys,
That are some painful bugs in 1.5.1.
They are fixed in the trunk.
So the question here is: what are the plans for next releases?
We have basically 2 options:
1. try to push a new 1.5.2 by February or so
2. push a 1.6.0
We don't have so much new features for now, so I'm quite sure, we
Jean-Louis:
This is a very serious topic for my company: we're releasing a product
which we document that it is supported with Apache TomEE+ 1.5.x, x=1. The
rationale for allowing our customers to use an higher fix version is to
benefit from Apache Tomcat security fixes.
When our product
is missing
something.
Thank you!
-David
On Dec 26, 2012, at 6:11 AM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org
wrote:
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=gpetracek;action=diff;uri=http://openejb.apache.org/tomee-mp-getting-started.mdtext
Index: trunk
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://openejb.apache.org/tomee-mp-getting-started.mdtext
Index: trunk/content/tomee-mp-getting-started.mdtext
===
--- trunk/content/tomee
URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=gpetracek;action=diff;uri=http://openejb.apache.org/tomee-mp-getting-started.mdtext
Index: trunk/content/tomee-mp-getting-started.mdtext
===
--- trunk/content/tomee-mp
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=gpetracek;action=diff;uri=http://openejb.apache.org/tomee-mp-getting-started.mdtext
Index: trunk/content/tomee-mp-getting-started.mdtext
===
--- trunk/content/tomee
) r1425328
Test yet to be added.
Does this look fine ? Any other ideas / any new archetype could be useful ?
-Vishwa
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-svn-commit-r1417653-in-openejb-trunk-openejb-maven-tomee-webapp-archetype-tomee-webapp-archetype
this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-svn-commit-r1423006-in-openejb-trunk-openejb-arquillian-arquillian-tomee-tests-arquillian-tomee--tp4659765p4659789.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
for now. Which I think it now does.
I think I even removed a snapshot already. Which snapshot are you not
liking?
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-svn-commit-r1423006-in-openejb-trunk-openejb-arquillian-arquillian-tomee-tests-arquillian-tomee
/rmannibucau
-- Forwarded message --
From: tveron...@apache.org
Date: 2012/12/18
Subject: svn commit: r1423544 -
/openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/webapp/command/impl/GetJndi.java
To: comm...@openejb.apache.org
Author: tveronezi
Date: Tue Dec 18
-- Forwarded message --
From: tveron...@apache.org
Date: 2012/12/18
Subject: svn commit: r1423544 -
/openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/webapp/command/impl/GetJndi.java
To: comm...@openejb.apache.org
Author: tveronezi
Date: Tue Dec 18 17:32:42 2012
New
://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
-- Forwarded message --
From: tveron...@apache.org
Date: 2012/12/18
Subject: svn commit: r1423544 -
/openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/webapp
/17
Subject: svn commit: r1423006 - in /openejb/trunk/openejb:
arquillian/arquillian-tomee-tests/arquillian-tomee-webprofile-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/openejb/arquillian/tests/ear/
arquillian/arquillian-tomee-tests/arquillian-tomee-webprofile-tests/src/test/ja...
To: comm...@openejb.apache.org
story, but just to keep people focus on
TomEE and to see it's alive and produces releases (more or less regular).
I updated the download page with all link and the release notes.
--
Jean-Louis
focus on
TomEE and to see it's alive and produces releases (more or less regular).
I updated the download page with all link and the release notes.
people focus on
TomEE and to see it's alive and produces releases (more or less regular).
I updated the download page with all link and the release notes.
-Louis MONTEIRO ha scritto:
Hi,
Just prepared two words on the blog.
If not feedback, it will publish it on Monday or next week.
https://blogs.apache.org/openejb/entry/apache_tomee_1_5_1
The goal is not to write a huge story, but just to keep people focus on
TomEE and to see it's alive
,
Just prepared two words on the blog.
If not feedback, it will publish it on Monday or next week.
https://blogs.apache.org/openejb/entry/apache_tomee_1_5_1
The goal is not to write a huge story, but just to keep people focus on
TomEE and to see it's alive and produces releases (more or less
it on Monday or next week.
https://blogs.apache.org/openejb/entry/apache_tomee_1_5_1
The goal is not to write a huge story, but just to keep people focus on
TomEE and to see it's alive and produces releases (more or less regular).
I updated the download page with all link and the release notes.
-Louis MONTEIRO ha scritto:
Hi,
Just prepared two words on the blog.
If not feedback, it will publish it on Monday or next week.
https://blogs.apache.org/openejb/entry/apache_tomee_1_5_1
The goal is not to write a huge story, but just to keep people focus
on
TomEE and to see it's
on the blog.
If not feedback, it will publish it on Monday or next week.
https://blogs.apache.org/openejb/entry/apache_tomee_1_5_1
The goal is not to write a huge story, but just to keep people
focus
on
TomEE and to see it's alive and produces releases (more or less
regular
Thanks David for fixing.
It was only meant to get people used to visit our website and also to make
sure TomEE is still active.
@Romain, yes, updating the Tomcat version.
Jean-Louis
2012/12/17 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
Tomcat 7.0.34 no?
Le 17 déc. 2012 06:54, David Blevins
Vote closed.
Vote passes with 9 +1s and a 0
+1s
Romain Manni-Bucau
Jean-Louis Monteiro
David Blevins
Jeff Genender
Jonathan Gallimore
Vishwanath Krishnamurthi
Thiago Veronezi
Alan Cabrera
Joerg Jans
0
Andy Gumbrecht
Thanks everyone who voted!
Will promote binaries and update download links and
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 10, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.1/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-132
Binaries Source:
(not sure I can vote, but here's the deal)
I installed Apache TomEE+ 1.5.1 from
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/staging-132/openejb-4.5.1/, on a
64-bit Windows 7 machine, after having added a suitable JRE_HOME into
startup.bat. I tried to register TomEE+ as a service :
1. set JRE_HOME=c
: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2012/12/13 Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.com:
(not sure I can vote, but here's the deal)
I installed Apache TomEE+ 1.5.1 from
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/staging-132/openejb-4.5.1/, on a
64-bit Windows 7
Done!
2012/12/11 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wget
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-132/org/apache/openejb/openejb-standalone/4.5.1/openejb-standalone-4.5.1.{tar.gz,zip}{,.asc,sha1,md5}
--
Jean-Louis
My webapps are running better on Tomee 1.5.1
Thanks
Great work !
Enrico Olivelli
Software Development Manager @Diennea
Tel.: (+39) 0546 667432 - Int. 925
Viale G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA)
MagNews - E-mail Marketing Solutions
http://www.magnews.it
Diennea - Digital Marketing Solutions
+0
Still some minor Win platform test failures. We should disable the tests.
Other than that everything looks good to go.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-5-1-TomEE-1-5-1-staging-132-tp4659354p4659401.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing
-5-1-TomEE-1-5-1-staging-132-tp4659354p4659401.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1
I just tested our project with the preview of 1.5.1 running on a windows
machine. All the problems we encountered with 1.5 are gone.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-5-1-TomEE-1-5-1-staging-132-tp4659354p4659428.html
Sent from the OpenEJB
On Dec 10, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
Binaries Source:
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/staging-132/openejb-4.5.1/
Whoops. I just noticed the OpenEJB Standalone zip/tar are not in the binaries
directory. This is a bug in the release-tools I
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.1/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-132
Binaries Source:
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/staging-132/openejb-4.5.1/
Legal:
Everything ready for vote.
Anyone wants to get into before I fire the real vote?
Jean-Louis
2012/12/10 jlmonte...@apache.org
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.1/
Maven Repo:
go for it
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2012/12/10 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com:
Everything ready for vote.
Anyone wants to get into before I
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.1/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-132
Binaries Source:
http://people.apache.org/~a102126/staging-132/openejb-4.5.1/
Legal:
Sorry, bad user name ...
2012/12/10 a102...@apache.org
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.1/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-132
Binaries Source:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.1/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-132
Binaries Source:
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/staging-132/openejb-4.5.1/
Legal:
Buildbot latest result on branch:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-4.5.1/builds/22
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-5-1-TomEE-1-5-1-staging-132-tp4659354p4659355.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive
-132/compareLibraries-1.5.1.txt
Buildbot latest result on branch:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-4.5.1/builds/22
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-5-1-TomEE-1-5-1-staging-132-tp4659354p4659355.html
Sent from
TCK looks good as well. My +1!
Such an excellent job Jean-Louis! This is a big milestone for the project.
Getting more people familiar with the release process is critical and you've
done a fantastic job at it. Thank you as well to Elisa and Luna for donating
their Jean-Louis time to us :)
-TomEE-1-5-1-staging-132-tp4659354p4659355.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1
Jon
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.1/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-132
Binaries Source:
Hi devs,
Ok, hope that set of binaries will be ok for everybody.
All patches should be in.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-132/
Will republish everything and fire a vote by tomorrow.
--
Jean-Louis
Hi,
Just a small message to let you start reviewing the 1.5.1 release notes.
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/releasenotes-1.5.1.html
--
Jean-Louis
Hi all,
Here are some news about the release process.
Check out all points in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-526
Some useful links
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/rat-1.5.1.txt
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/releasenotes-1.5.1.html
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau
.
Check out all points in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-526
Some useful links
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/rat-1.5.1.txt
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/releasenotes-1.5.1.html
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapacheopenejb-118/archives.html
--
Jean-Louis
all,
Here are some news about the release process.
Check out all points in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-526
Some useful links
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/rat-1.5.1.txt
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/releasenotes-1.5.1.html
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau
Think we should catch noclassdeffounderror too,
Anyone to add it on trunk + branch please? Cant do it before monday
-- Message transféré --
De : jlmonte...@apache.org
Date : 7 déc. 2012 23:44
Objet : svn commit: r1418530 -
/openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-catalina/src/main/java
Hi Romain,
Would be nice to have these added to it.
I'll get started with this, this evening.
-Vishwa
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys,
with JL we got as feedback we were missing a real archetype with tomee
maven plugin etc configured
with tomee
maven plugin etc configured.
i pushed a simple one
i commented all the arquillian stuff (to avoid to need to pull it if not
used)
currently it only contain a servlet, and a beans.xml
wonder if
1) we should put some basic persistence (1 entity + 1 persistence.xml
+ openjpa
:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys,
with JL we got as feedback we were missing a real archetype with tomee
maven plugin etc configured.
i pushed a simple one
i commented all the arquillian stuff (to avoid to need to pull it if not
used)
currently
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://openejb.apache.org/tomee-and-webspheremq.mdtext
rohid...@gmail.com
Index: trunk/content/tomee-and-webspheremq.mdtext
===
--- trunk
Hi,
What's the goal excepting get another resolution?
-- Message transféré --
De : David Blevins (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Date : 7 déc. 2012 03:33
Objet : [jira] [Created] (TOMEE-635) Revamp resources.xml deployment to not
immediately install
À : comm...@openejb.apache.org
David
Same question ;)
This requirement is normal and implicit (since a new is done), what's the
issue?
-- Message transféré --
De : David Blevins (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Date : 7 déc. 2012 03:29
Objet : [jira] [Created] (TOMEE-634) Resource class-name=org.foo.Bar/
requires org.foo.Bar
just check for the existence of an 'META-INF'
sub-directory?
Input would be welcome.
Andy.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/DeploymentLoader-java-Revision-1416096-TOMEE-613-Extracted-EARs-do-not-deploy-without-META-INF-applie-tp4659113.html
Sent from
the best
way to filter. Shouldn't we just check for the existence of an 'META-INF'
sub-directory?
Input would be welcome.
Andy.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/DeploymentLoader-java-Revision-1416096-TOMEE-613-Extracted-EARs-do-not-deploy-without-META-INF
Hi guys,
with JL we got as feedback we were missing a real archetype with tomee
maven plugin etc configured.
i pushed a simple one
i commented all the arquillian stuff (to avoid to need to pull it if not used)
currently it only contain a servlet, and a beans.xml
wonder if
1) we should put
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://openejb.apache.org/tomee-and-netbeans.page%2F
Tiklu Ganguly
of the confusion on TOMEE-597.
It seems possible Tomcat misinterprets java:app/Foo names and binds them to
java:comp/env/app/Foo, in which case we should likely remove the non-portable
java:comp/env/app/Foo binding. Effectively, it's a Tomcat bug from not
understanding the new java:app
perspective, right, Tomcat does not add java:app
names. I suspect this, in combination with the above non-intuative rules
about declaring vs using java:app names, is the source of the confusion on
TOMEE-597.
It seems possible Tomcat misinterprets java:app/Foo names and binds them
On Nov 22, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
The release notes preview is available here
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/releasenotes-1.5.1.html
Excellent to see it working! I always have problems getting it to run. Seems I
always have to patch something.
(Thread.java:662)
java.lang.Exception: Could not load
tomee-jaxrs-webapp/target/tomee-jaxrs-webapp-1/5/1-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/tomee/webapp/servlet/CommandExecutorServlet$1.class
at
org.apache.openejb.util.AnnotationFinder.readClassDef(AnnotationFinder.java:289
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
java.lang.Exception: Could not load
tomee-jaxrs-webapp/target/tomee-jaxrs-webapp-1/5/1-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/tomee/webapp/servlet
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
java.lang.Exception: Could not load
tomee-jaxrs-webapp/target/tomee-jaxrs-webapp-1/5/1-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/tomee/webapp/servlet/CommandExecutorServlet$1.class
at
org.apache.openejb.util.AnnotationFinder.readClassDef
/installation-drop-in-war.mdtext (revision 1412723)
+++ trunk/content/installation-drop-in-war.mdtext (working copy)
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@
- Update $CATALINA_HOME/conf/tomcat-users.xml to add a tomee user to allow
access to the console
- !-- Activate those lines to get access to TomEE
)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
java.lang.Exception: Could not load
tomee-jaxrs-webapp/target/tomee-jaxrs-webapp-1/5/1-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/tomee/webapp/servlet/CommandExecutorServlet$1.class
at
org.apache.openejb.util.AnnotationFinder.readClassDef(AnnotationFinder.java:289
Really nice!
thank you
- Enrico
Il 23/11/2012 19:32, David Blevins ha scritto:
On Nov 22, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
The release notes preview is available here
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/releasenotes-1.5.1.html
Excellent to see it working! I
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE as the TLP name
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:04 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
What do people think about renaming this TLP from OpenEJB to TomEE?
Just to let you know I've read the thread, but still have no idea what
the solution should
On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Afair the policy so far has been that all packages must be under the TLP
name. That was the reason why CODI also has org.apache.myfaces.extension.cdi
and not simply org.apache.codi. That was the main reason for proposing
So all is fine?
What are we waiting for now?
Le 19 nov. 2012 22:39, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Afair the policy so far has been that all packages must be under the TLP
name. That was the reason why
At this point we draft up a board resolution to amend our TLP name and
description and vote on it. Then we wait till next board meeting till its
official.
The next board meeting is actually Wednesday morning, so not enough time
for a 72 hour vote, but that's ok. We have time.
On Monday,
If this is really fine then let's go for it!
OpenEJB could be a sub project of TomEE with no problems in that case.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:51 PM
Subject
1 - 100 of 840 matches
Mail list logo
