If this is really fine then let's go for it! OpenEJB could be a sub project of TomEE with no problems in that case.
LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > To: dev@openejb.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:51 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE as the TLP name > > So all is fine? > > What are we waiting for now? > Le 19 nov. 2012 22:39, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > >> >> On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >> >> > Afair the policy so far has been that all packages must be under the > TLP >> name. That was the reason why CODI also has >> org.apache.myfaces.extension.cdi and not simply org.apache.codi. That was >> the main reason for proposing two TLPs even if there is lots of overlap. >> > Not sure if this argument is still valid or if we could get an > exception >> from board though... >> >> It's as much of a rule as we want to make it. Some popular Apache >> packages that are not TLPs: >> >> - org.apache.derby >> - org.apache.torque >> - org.apache.yoko >> - org.apache.xbean >> - org.apache.woden >> - org.apache.neethi >> >> If you use a clear brand, it's not a problem. If you do >> "org.apache.naming", that's awfully frowned upon. :) >> >> If we want to change package names on code we can do that, but there >> certainly won't be anyone forcing us to do that. >> >> >> -David >> >> >
