[VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Dear OpenMeetings Community, I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 RC2 Main changes are covered in the Readme: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/3.0.0RC2/README Full Changelog: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/3.0.0RC2/CHANGELOG

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

+1 --- El lun, 03-03-2014 a las 23:09 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió: > Dear OpenMeetings Community, > > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 RC2 > > Main changes are covered in the > Readme: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi Maxim, Thanks, I think one of the major obstacles has been the CPU usage of the screen sharing application. Did we reduce the CPU usage significantly? Thanks, Sebastian 2014-03-04 5:41 GMT+13:00 Alvaro : > +1 > > --- > > > El lun, 03-03-2014 a las 23:09 +0700, Maxim Solo

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hello Sebastian, I was unable to fix high CPU usage because I can't see it :( We have tried to reproduce it on our machines (me and Vasiliy, Vasiliy provides you with his measurements), but it is not reproducible. No additional comments were provided, so this issue have been postponed On Tue,

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

+1 -Ono 2014-03-04 13:14 GMT+09:00 Maxim Solodovnik : > Hello Sebastian, > > I was unable to fix high CPU usage because I can't see it :( > We have tried to reproduce it on our machines (me and Vasiliy, Vasiliy > provides you with his measurements), but it is not reproducible. > No additional com

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Well if its just me I do not want to complain. I am using a Mac, probably that is part of the problem. Let me try to run a couple of tests. Btw: Is http://demo.dataved.ru:5080/ the same SNAPSHOT that is up for a vote? Thanks! Sebastian 2014-03-04 17:14 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik : > Hello Seb

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

I think there is still a slight glitch with the recordings UI. Previously, when a recording was not yet ready for viewing (because it is still processing) there was a message in the UI telling you that. In the case of interviews there was even a progress includes in percentages as interviews take

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Currently "not ready" recordings are marked as "broken" (same "!" icon) not ready status will be displayed after click on "!" icon in the popup. interview recordings are now converted as fast as ordinary recordings. Icon can be changed, please suggest one :) (Do you feel it is blocker? or maybe w

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

"not ready status will be displayed after click on "!" icon in the popup." I did not get a not ready status displayed. I see the icon on the left, but neither by clicking on the icon nor on the recording anything happens. Can we make it that somehow that it will be displayed directly when you clic

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi there, i had the same problem, I couldn't get a valid record on my test-system. I use Linux. I thought it is a problem with my test-env, because it differs a bit from the production-server... so.. I think, recording should be fixed before release... sorry :-( Greetings Peter Am 04.03.2014

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi there, i had the same problem, I couldn't get a valid record on my test-system. I use Linux. I thought it is a problem with my test-env, because it differs a bit from the production-server... so.. I think, recording should be fixed before release... sorry :-( Greetings Peter Am 04.03.2014 0

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

i think you just can get the record inside OM, but you can download the files.. as far as i remember... hope that helps... Am 04.03.2014 10:26, schrieb Peter Dähn: > Hi there, > > i had the same problem, I couldn't get a valid record on my > test-system. I use Linux. I thought it is a problem wi

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hello Sebastian, Thanks for detailed testing Could you please move your recording into Public (Openmeetings) group so I can take a look at it? All test recordings I have made were made locally, should will try to do it on demo. now will try to answer in bullet list: 1) "Can we make it that someh

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hello Peter, What version of OM were you using? Could you retest using RC2? (it contains screen sharing fixes) Were you able to record interview? Can you try multiple resolutions/fps? On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Peter Dähn wrote: > Hi there, > > i had the same problem, I couldn't get a va

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

It seems like your ffmpeg has no x264 support :( both following commands are failed: /usr/local/bin/ffmpeg -i /home/worker/red5_3_0/red5/webapps/openmeetings/streams/hibernate/flvRecording_298.flv -c:v libx264 -crf 24 -pix_fmt yuv420p -preset medium -profile:v baseline -c:a libfaac -c:a libfdk_aac

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

yes... that what i meant with "differs from production server"... I try to fix it... brb Am 04.03.2014 13:54, schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > It seems like your ffmpeg has no x264 support :( > > both following commands are failed: > /usr/local/bin/ffmpeg -i > /home/worker/red5_3_0/red5/webapps/openme

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

screen sharing applet can not record sound to get sound you need to start video stream (select camera and mic) then perform the recording On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Peter Dähn wrote: > well it was ffmpeg... i recompiled it and now i got a record without the > "!" sign and it is played in

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

well.. that what i did... i got synchronized video under windows-client with sound.. once.. seemed to be fine... but i just get the record played inside om, when running OM-server in debug mode (start red5-debug.sh)... any ideas about that? Am 04.03.2014 15:39, schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > screen

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

I missed the video window on your screenshot It's black, something wrong with it This need to be investigated, but i guess it's not screen sharing problem On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Peter Dähn wrote: > well.. that what i did... i got synchronized video under windows-client > with soun

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

no time left today... someone bordered me with wp-multisite config... :-( try to figure it out tomorrow.. Greetings Peter Am 04.03.2014 16:09, schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > I missed the video window on your screenshot > It's black, something wrong with it > This need to be investigated, but i

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

+1 On 03.03.2014 23:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: Dear OpenMeetings Community, I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 RC2 Main changes are covered in the Readme: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/3.0.0RC2/README Full Changelog: https://svn.apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi there... I was testing RC2 today... I just can get audio+video using IE, with Chrome an FF I got no sound recorded.. :-( I didn't test Safari... Any Ideas? Is it reproducible? If it is in that way, it wouldn't be good to release it in that way... Greetings Peter Am 04.03.2014 17:36, schrieb

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

I would recommend to move this discussion to another thread. According to your question, just have recorded video with audio om demo.dataved.ru Maybe mic/camera problems? On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Peter Dähn wrote: > Hi there... > > I was testing RC2 today... > > I just can get audio+vid

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

yes... that what i meant with "differs from production server"... I try to fix it... brb Am 04.03.2014 13:54, schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > It seems like your ffmpeg has no x264 support :( > > both following commands are failed: > /usr/local/bin/ffmpeg -i > /home/worker/red5_3_0/red5/webapps/openme

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi All, Recordings were unstable in the previous releases too, I believe this have not become worse. I would suggest make a release for now and file bugs about the recordings problems. My vote is +1. Best regards, Irina On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Vasiliy Degtyarev wrote: > +1 > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

My vote is +1. Denis Kandrov. On 03.03.2014 23:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: Dear OpenMeetings Community, I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 RC2 Main changes are covered in the Readme: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/3.0.0RC2/README Full C

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi at all, my vote is -1 screen-recording should be fixed (or investigated what went wrong here)... I made an update to a version without screen recording (2.2). The people will not understand, that the next major-update will come without this feature... Sorry... Greetings Peter Am 03.03.2014

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi Peter, I believe the first step to have recordings issue resolved is to create informative bug in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS Could you please create a bug and describe exact steps how to reproduce the issue, describe your environment, etc.? It would be really help

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

I am closing the Vote for the Release Candidate 2, 72 hours are over. The Vote is considered to be positive, it received: 5 PPMC +1: solomax, albus, vdegtyatev, dkandrov, iarkh Wider Community: 1 times +1Keiji Ono 1 time -1: Peter Däh

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Sorry but I am not voting positive. I do not agree that the recording issues are "broken the same as before". I would rather like to resolve that before we ship that RC. If we release a RC as 3.x and we already know it has bugs that we just do not fix, it will not have the positive effect on the co

RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

l.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 12:00 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 Sorry but I am not voting positive. I do not agree that the recording issues are "broken the same as before". I would rather like to resolve

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

I would also like to ship "bug free release", but unfortunately it is impossible. Last few releases were tested/voted in the manner I personally do not like: 1) no testing/issues during development phase 2) lots of "last day" show stoppers right after the VOTE is begin I would prefer to release 3.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

elease a product with > known major bugs. > > Joseph > > Joseph Karwat | CEO | 415.462.0263 > Jell Networks, LLC > > > -Original Message- > From: seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 12:00 PM > To: dev > S

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

m to release a product with > > known major bugs. > > > > Joseph > > > > Joseph Karwat | CEO | 415.462.0263 > > Jell Networks, LLC > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com] > > Se

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

Hi Maxim, The other topics to be covered in another conversation, I think this issue is worth a separated thread. "Could you please move your recording into Public (Openmeetings) group so I can take a look at it?" => I did just that now. "All test recordings I have made were made locally, should

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

I haven't monitored Red5 CPU usage But the system is very responsive (Maybe because it is core i7 8 cores, 8Gb) I see no performance degradation. The stream is still being written to the disc asynchronously (this code was slightly optimized) I have put the recording made just now on my machine to

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

Does it take for you also that long when you hit the stop button until the recording UI does really stop and switch the button state ? Can we have a look at the 1 hour recording, can you put that in the public folder too ? I created another video on demo.dataved.ru using a Windows machine. I put

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

I'll ask Vasiliy to share his recording and/or create another one. Will try to check your recording in the morning seems like it have no videodata (or broken videodata) :( Not sure what can be done here, but i'll check On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:03 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote: > Does it take

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

I have just checked the file you have created: [flashsv @ 0x28fcd60] Frame width or height differs from first frame! [flashsv @ 0x28fcd60] fh = 810, fv 1440 vs ch = 1080, cv = 1920 Error while decoding stream #0:0: Invalid data found when processing input According to the file header: Stream #0

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

good morning... I have the same messages in my recordings... Meeting and then i will do the stepbystep thing... ;-) Greetings Peter Am 06.03.2014 04:36, schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > I have just checked the file you have created: > > [flashsv @ 0x28fcd60] Frame width or height differs from firs

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

Hello Sebastian, can you please update OPENMEETINGS-936 with as detailed repo steps as possible I'll try to modify the screen sharing applet to address your issue, but detailed steps might help On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Maxim Solodov

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

Hi Maxim, yes sorry I had no time yesterday what exactly is the different between height/width and flv_height/flv_width. I will try to come back on that later. Sebastian 2014-03-07 6:35 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik : > Hello Sebastian, > > can you please update > OPENMEETINGS-936

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

According to the code width/height is the original width/height of the picture being sent to Red5 by camera/screensharing app. flv_width/flv_height is resized width/height multiple by 16 and applied on the last step of the conversion. Not sure how were you able to get first frame of another size