on Tuesday, April 29, 2014 10:10 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> FYI
>
> The CMS builder is down again. When clicking on the "[Follow Staging
> Build]" link in CMS, I come to
> "http://ci.apache.org/builders/ooo-site-site-staging"; and the error
> message "503 Service Unavailable".
>
> The status mont
Hi,
I have uploaded kid language packs for AOO 4.1.0 under
http://people.apache.org/~jsc/releases/4.1.0/kid_langpack/
I hope you can use them to improve the translation where necessary or to
identify easier where the string have to be searched in Pootle.
Juergen
V Utorok, 29. apríl 2014 o 14:09 +0200, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
napísal(a):
Hi Oliver,
I tried yesterday download links you provided for Czech and Slovak, and
looked functional.
Deeper testing comes later this day, probably after yours desired time.
Regards,
Michal Hriň
> Hi,
>
> I am in prep
>or browse to [1] to have every available file in one place.
>[1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html
This page is not very helpful for not native english end-users.
I will create a specific page to have this info in french.
Thanks
---
Hi Michal,
On 30.04.2014 08:09, Michal Hriň wrote:
V Utorok, 29. apríl 2014 o 14:09 +0200, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
napísal(a):
Hi Oliver,
I tried yesterday download links you provided for Czech and Slovak, and
looked functional.
Thanks for checking and confirming that at the first glance the
Hi,
removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that
we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well.
Any opinions?
Juergen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For addit
Hi,
On 30.04.2014 09:33, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that
we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well.
Any opinions?
+1 for removing the 4.1 beta 'bits' from the SourceForge server.
Best regards, Oliver.
Juergen
On 2/28/14 9:06 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 2/27/14 11:53 PM, Samer Mansour wrote:
>> I'm tweaking the source SVGs so that the pixels in lines aren't between two
>> pixels and look blurry.
>> Once the SVGs are done its only a few minutes to generate the different
>> output types.
>>
>> I kept wa
On 30.04.2014 00:15, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/29/2014 02:15 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
Announced on en-Forum.
BTW:
Time to create a "4.1.0" value for the "Version" field in BZ.
Good point. I disabled the 4.1.0-Beta and 4.1.0-dev versions, disabled
the 4.1.0 target milestone, added a 4.2.0
On 4/29/14 10:56 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Fixed as of r1591100, thanks!.
>
> Sorry, I knew some of this could happen.
>
> Unfortunately AOO is broken with FreeBSD 10+ (clang/libc++ has bridge
> issues) so
> my testing was limited. It also means I won't be doing much AOO in a while.
mmh, I don'
Greetings!
My name is A L Vindhya, I'm from India Bangalore.Interested in software
development.
Please let me know how to register in order to contribute to apache.
Regards
Vindhya
Hi,
for AOO 3.4 we had already discussed and later on reverted a change to
enable the ODF Document encryption AES-256 by default.
Some time ago I played with a new option field to allow the user to
enable this option as new default, see [1]
By default the office still uses the old blowfish algor
+1
Shenfeng (Simon)
2014-04-30 15:37 GMT+08:00 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann :
> Hi,
>
>
> On 30.04.2014 09:33, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that
>> we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well.
>>
>> Any opinions?
>>
A User on en-Forum has posted this:
After receiving notification of the availability of Open Office 4.1.0, in which
it was stated that the update was suitable for Mac OS X 10.3 onwards, I
downloaded the relevant file … noting that it stated:
"Download Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
Click he
On 4/30/14 1:42 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> A User on en-Forum has posted this:
>
> After receiving notification of the availability of Open Office 4.1.0, in
> which it was stated that the update was suitable for Mac OS X 10.3 onwards, I
> downloaded the relevant file … noting that i
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:48:38PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/30/14 1:42 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> > A User on en-Forum has posted this:
> >
> > After receiving notification of the availability of Open Office 4.1.0
Where did he get the notification? The update mechanism sup
Hi,
On 30.04.2014 15:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:48:38PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 4/30/14 1:42 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
A User on en-Forum has posted this:
After receiving notification of the availability of Open Office 4.1.0
Where did he
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:09:13 +0200
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30.04.2014 15:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:48:38PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 4/30/14 1:42 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> >>> A User on en-Forum has posted this:
> >>>
Hi,
I have committed new Update XML feeds.
Update notifications for Mac OS X OpenOffice installed instances are now
deactivated due to a oversight on my side.
As I would like to consider the change in the supported architecture I
will work on a solution in the next days.
Best regards, Oliv
2014-04-30 15:09 GMT+02:00 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann :
> Hi,
>
>
> On 30.04.2014 15:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:48:38PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/30/14 1:42 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>>>
A User on en-Forum has posted this:
>>>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have committed new Update XML feeds.
> Update notifications for Mac OS X OpenOffice installed instances are now
> deactivated due to a oversight on my side.
>
> As I would like to consider the change in the supported archit
2014-04-30 0:02 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti :
> Tal Daniel wrote:
>
>> FYI: at Sourceforge, the big green download button downloads the 4.0.1
>> version. It happened to me
>>
>
> This must be fixed in the SourceForge OpenOffice mirror project by those
> who can administer it. Note: if I remember cor
On 4/30/14 10:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for AOO 3.4 we had already discussed and later on reverted a change to
> enable the ODF Document encryption AES-256 by default.
>
> Some time ago I played with a new option field to allow the user to
> enable this option as new default, see [1]
FWIW ...
The change was announced ages ago:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201404.mbox/raw/%3C5345E952.8060909%40apache.org%3E
But of course there were good reasons to wait after the release before
committing it.
About the argument of the value behind the changes, som
Anyone out their willing and able to assist with this issue? We are not making
any progress.
-Original Message-
From: Herbert Duerr [mailto:h...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 12:12 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
O
Am 04/30/2014 10:06 AM, schrieb Herbert Duerr:
On 30.04.2014 00:15, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/29/2014 02:15 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
Announced on en-Forum.
BTW:
Time to create a "4.1.0" value for the "Version" field in BZ.
Good point. I disabled the 4.1.0-Beta and 4.1.0-dev versions, dis
Am 04/30/2014 09:02 AM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
on Tuesday, April 29, 2014 10:10 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
FYI
The CMS builder is down again. When clicking on the "[Follow Staging
Build]" link in CMS, I come to
"http://ci.apache.org/builders/ooo-site-site-staging"; and the error
message "503 Servi
Am 04/30/2014 09:33 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that
we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well.
Any opinions?
a beta (or any other pre-release build) has a defined date of expiry and
shouldn't be used after this.
+1
On 4/30/14, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 04/30/2014 09:33 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>> removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that
>> we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well.
>>
>> Any opinions?
>
> a beta (or any other pre-release build) has a defined
Am 04/30/2014 09:01 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
Hi,
I have uploaded kid language packs for AOO 4.1.0 under
http://people.apache.org/~jsc/releases/4.1.0/kid_langpack/
I hope you can use them to improve the translation where necessary or to
identify easier where the string have to be searched in
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that
> we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well.
>
> Any opinions?he usefulness of the beta has exop
>
> Juergen
>
+1
The usefulness of the Beta has expired so there is no reason to
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:48:38PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 4/30/14 1:42 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>>> A User on en-Forum has posted this:
>>>
>>> After receiving notification of the availability of Open Office 4.1.0
>
> Where did he get the no
On 30/04/2014 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/30/2014 09:33 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that
we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well.
Any opinions?
a beta (or any other pre-release build) has a defined date of expiry an
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/30/2014 09:01 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
I have uploaded kid language packs for AOO 4.1.0 under
http://people.apache.org/~jsc/releases/4.1.0/kid_langpack/
Thanks for this, they will be very useful to localization volunteers.
By the way, how do I enable kid? I instal
Hi Keith,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:14:00PM -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> > Another broken thing in MacOSX are C++ extensions, I have seen any
> > mention of this in the release notes.
> >
> >
> Ariel;
>
> If you can you point me to any discussion of this problem for MaxOSX
AFAIK there has
Hi Oliver,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 03:09:13PM +0200, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> >>I agree that this is confusing and we have to improve this. We
> >>should try to avoid update notifications for older systems but it's
> >>not so easy.
> >
> >Well, the update feed has a way to tell the applicat
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:14:00PM -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>> Another broken thing in MacOSX are C++ extensions, I have seen any
>>> mention of this in the release notes.
>>>
>>>
>> Ariel;
>>
>> If you can you point me to any discussion of this
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
will also start another thread here as to whether we should add it to
the 4.1 notes.
No need to discuss it. The Mac OS X C++ extensions compatibility is
clearly something that must be added to the 4.1 Release Notes.
The "Known Issues" are our way to tell users about c
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> will also start another thread here as to whether we should add it to
>> the 4.1 notes.
>
> No need to discuss it. The Mac OS X C++ extensions compatibility is
> clearly something that must be added to the 4.1 Release Notes.
>
> The "Known Issue
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:14:00PM -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>> Another broken thing in MacOSX are C++ extensions, I have seen any
>>> mention of this in the release notes.
>>>
>>>
>> Ariel;
>>
>> If you can you point me to any discussion of this
Am 04/30/2014 09:21 AM, schrieb FR web forum:
or browse to [1] to have every available file in one place.
[1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html
This page is not very helpful for not native english end-users.
I will create a specific page to have this info in french.
Understood.
B
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:14:18PM -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> Ariel et al ;
>
> One question. Am I correct in assuming that the only fix is for the
> extension developer to re-write the extension for 64-bit for MacOSX?
Recompile the extension (and fix if something gets broken after the
comp
Hi all,
The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository was updated and from now
it provides the version 4.1 of Apache Openoffice with all available
languages.
All information needed for new installations or upgrades are available
from README file[1].
[1]https://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/
Am 04/30/2014 01:42 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
A User on en-Forum has posted this:
After receiving notification of the availability of Open Office 4.1.0, in which
it was stated that the update was suitable for Mac OS X 10.3 onwards, I
downloaded the relevant file … noting that it
44 matches
Mail list logo
