> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 10:38
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans
>
> On 20/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> > The issue is whether it
Re-evaluate ones priorities.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
On 20/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote:
The issue is whether it is ASF distributed software, for which ASF
trademarks can appropriately be used. I think it is and should continue
to be ASF distributed software.
So far we've adopted another approach: it is a development tool meant to
ease
On 17/02/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 15/02/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Please use the following format for your next OpenOffice commit
"#i123456# Description of the fix" ...
It seems that the bot is back to normal activity.
The bot had stopped working again. Restarting it is trivial (for
Am 03/25/2016 06:12 AM, schrieb Don Lewis:
On 17 Mar, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 03/15/16 13:46, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
I have been noticing damjan's great advance in merging the gbuild stuff.
It would be rather interesting to compare the buildworld timing.
Is it faster to build with
Am 03/26/2016 12:20 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
If someone is interested in the story, all buildbots broke because we
download dependencies from the (SourceForge-hosted) ooo-extras
repository before building. SF decided to switch from HTTP to HTTPS but
our buildbots were caught unprepared (we
Issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11296 has been open
for more than one month. It prevents buildbots from operating correctly.
Infra did fix one buildbot, but 5 are still waiting.
If someone is interested in the story, all buildbots broke because we
download dependencies from
On 22/03/2016 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
For the past month I've been working on preparing the gbuild branch
for merge into trunk, and I believe it to be essentially ready.
Thank you Damjan, this is one of the best news about project development
we've had in recent months! And I won't insist
Am 03/26/2016 10:50 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 03/26/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
If the aim is to create less confusion, all proposals I've seen have the
result of bringing more confusion! So:
I don't see why this brings more confusion. It's the opposite, one
Marcus wrote:
Am 03/26/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
If the aim is to create less confusion, all proposals I've seen have the
result of bringing more confusion! So:
I don't see why this brings more confusion. It's the opposite, one
status for "resolved with a code fix" and the other
Am 03/26/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 25/03/2016 Marcus wrote:
Within this thread the agreemnt seems to be to use RESOLVED - MANAGED or
RESOLVED - DONE. In the meantime I tent to RESOLVED - DONE.
If the aim is to create less confusion, all proposals I've seen have the
result of
Am 03/25/2016 11:37 PM, schrieb Justin Hinckfoot:
I am running into issues once I click Download Full Installation. The
error I receive is attached below.
*Problem description* *Exchange this text to describe the problem
(What does not work? What do you expect?)*
*Browser variables*
12 matches
Mail list logo
