Marcus wrote:
Am 03/26/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
If the aim is to create less confusion, all proposals I've seen have the
result of bringing more confusion! So:
I don't see why this brings more confusion. It's the opposite, one
status for "resolved with a code fix" and the other for "resolved
somehow else".
It brings more confusion since it would need to be explained explicitly
(because DONE or MANAGED would apply, looking purely at their meaning,
to a code fix too, and it's only a convention that we use them for
"no-code" fixes only). And if we have more intuitive options I feel this
would be better.
It doesn't have to be "NOCODE", but it should be
something that means "nothing to do with code", and DONE does not really
convey the right meaning here.
Then NOCODEFIX sounds more concrete.
Yes, NOCODEFIX sounds good too. Again, so long as it is a word that a
developer cannot be mistaken into choosing instead of FIXED, it will be
OK for me. What we want to avoid is that a developer accidentally uses
DONE for a code fix and the issue is suddenly not listed in QA and similar.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
