> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 15:26
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
> Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)
>
> Am 08/09/2016 11:12 PM, schrieb
[BCC PMC]
The [VOTE] to release the Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 source code has passed.
Tally
+1 Ariel Constenla-Haile
+1 Patricia Shanahan
+1 Marcus Lange
+1 Carl Marcum
+1 Kay Schenk
+1 Andrea Pescetti
6 +1 Approve, with description (all bindng)
0 0 Abstentions
0
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> Seeing the issue from a purely technical point of view (i.e., imagining
> for a while that there is no cost associated and no Infra around), how far
> are we from having an "Apache OpenOffice build farm" where we can
On 08/09/2016 12:21 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
Now that the buildbots work, and we are planning to start with releases
again, it would be nice to have a good set of tests to run against
releases, and running them against nightly builds wouldn't hurt either.
Our unit tests do run during the
Hello;
This is interesting but I have no time to investigate it.
There's also travis-ci which would be a nice-to-have alternative to the
ASF buildbots and I think they also support MacOS X.
Pedro.
Forwarded Message
Subject: [GitHub] The Apache Software Foundation has
On 8/9/2016 3:12 PM, Marcus wrote:
...
we have a documented release process here [1]. Of course it's for a full
release. But for a bugfix (or emergency) release it can be derived and
then shortend.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release+Planning+Template
That is the
Am 08/09/2016 11:07 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 8/9/2016 8:52 AM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/08/2016 09:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 8/8/2016 11:14 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 07/08/2016 Marcus wrote:
Maybe we are not that
On 8/9/2016 2:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
How do we go about getting trained as release manager?
By making a release, or two.
If we only do two or three releases a year, we will only be able to
train release managers are a rate of about two a year. Is that fast
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
How do we go about getting trained as release manager?
By making a release, or two.
Documenting the process in more detail?
You can see the whole process documented everywhere (ASF pages and CWiki
for the 4.1.2 release), but it's a matter of tooling at this stage
[top posting]
I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual
HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" instruction for ALL zips
that simply says -- "Unzip this package to some folder of your choosing
and
On 8/9/2016 8:52 AM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/08/2016 09:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 8/8/2016 11:14 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 07/08/2016 Marcus wrote:
Maybe we are not that far aways from each other. What I want to to
avoid
is
Am 08/08/2016 09:54 PM, schrieb William L. Anderson:
Kay, I have attached a ".txt" file that incorporates the changes suggested. Two
items are *not* included.
thanks. This is very much appreciated. We will include your text into
the Readme file soon.
(1) There is a need to provide the md5
Kay Schenk wrote:
On 08/09/2016 10:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Kay, me and a bunch of other people have access to ooo-extras and can
give you upload access.
I already have access.
Sorry for the poor wording. I was addressing Don and I meant "Kay AND me
and a bunch of other people have
(Reposting from my @apache address so it gets through easier)
Hello;
This (running coverity from github) is interesting but I have no time
to investigate.
There's also travis-ci which would be a nice-to-have alternative to the
ASF buildbots and I think they also support MacOS X.
Pedro.
On 08/09/2016 10:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Don Lewis wrote:
If you get through the build, that's a pretty good test. During the
build saxparser uses expat to read the .xml files for all of the
locales.
The other thing that expat seems to get used for is the tree view
Don Lewis wrote:
If you get through the build, that's a pretty good test. During the
build saxparser uses expat to read the .xml files for all of the
locales.
The other thing that expat seems to get used for is the tree view of
help topics.
Help -> OpenOffice Help -> Contents
Just
Seeing the issue from a purely technical point of view (i.e., imagining
for a while that there is no cost associated and no Infra around), how
far are we from having an "Apache OpenOffice build farm" where we can
build releases?
Note: this is not a buildbot. Buildbots are meant to check that
On 9 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2016 03:22 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 8 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/07/2016 08:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 5 Aug, To: dev@openoffice.apache.org wrote:
> I just submitted a patch to upgrade the bundled expat to version 2.2.0:
>
On 08/09/2016 09:21 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> Now that the buildbots work, and we are planning to start with releases
> again, it would be nice to have a good set of tests to run against
> releases, and running them against nightly builds wouldn't hurt either.
>
> Our unit tests do
Hi
Now that the buildbots work, and we are planning to start with releases
again, it would be nice to have a good set of tests to run against
releases, and running them against nightly builds wouldn't hurt either.
Our unit tests do run during the build and pass, but they cover very
little. Sady,
On 08/08/2016 03:22 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 8 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/07/2016 08:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 5 Aug, To: dev@openoffice.apache.org wrote:
I just submitted a patch to upgrade the bundled expat to version 2.2.0:
On 08/08/2016 09:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> On 8/8/2016 11:14 AM, Marcus wrote:
>> Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> On 07/08/2016 Marcus wrote:
Maybe we are not that far aways from each other. What I want to to
avoid
is to provide hundreads of MBs for a
> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 21:26
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases
>
> On 8/8/2016 11:14 AM, Marcus wrote:
> > Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> >> On
On 08/05/2016 12:28 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING].
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [TESTING]
Hi Dany,
Are you behind a corporate firewall?
If you use the address in your web browser do you see the directory
listings?
Does the svn process work if you replace https with http?
Thanks,
Carl
On 08/09/2016 05:28 AM, Kirsten S wrote:
Hello Together,
thanks or your help so far.
Hello Together,
thanks or your help so far. Unfortunately I wasn`t sucesfull in building
it yet. The period in the link above posted by me was an accident.
When I execute the svn co statement it seems like the process starts
shortly but after round about 10 seconds it finishes without any
26 matches
Mail list logo