Hi Dean, all
>
> I think Microsoft does this on purpose.
>
> >"reads all current file types of major competitors."
>
> It may read it, but it does not always understand it.
Agreed, that is why I think the emphasys should be on file _types_.
The same can be said about Microsoft Office. Using
Dear all,
I can read a book written in German, but I cannot understand it. AOO does not
seem to understand many docx, especially those with formulae. The files I use
on a day-to-day basis need to have margins adjusted to 'fit' the pages,
formulaes added and generally pictures too.
I think
> On May 24, 2020 3:13 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
> 1) There is no way that you can confirm the entry without accepting the
> autoInput. So you quickly make errors as unexperienced user.
As long as you keep typing you don't need to delete anything, unless your new
string is a subset of a
Am 24.05.20 um 12:37 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
Everyone knows that. Me too.
But Peter talked about 'multiple ideas to fill the gap on OOXML'. *What are
these ideas?*
1) finish OOXML implementation we have
2) use Apache POI (Is in Java)
3) Port the LO version into an extension (The extension
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mechtilde [mailto:o...@mechtilde.de]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 12:17 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>
> Hello,
>
> Am 24.05.20 um 11:52 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> >
> >
> >> -Original
+1 to Rory's suggestion.
Since the discussion already went of topic, let's not forget to rephrase
that sentence... ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
Am 24.05.20 um 09:20 schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
> On Sat, 23 May 2020 22:34:03 +0200
> Czesław Wolański wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apache OpenOffice Product
Hello,
Am 24.05.20 um 11:52 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 11:21 AM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>>
>>
>> Am 24.05.20 um 11:10
> -Original Message-
> From: Czesław Wolański [mailto:czeslaw.wolan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 11:31 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>
> Hi,
>
> On the said page i.e.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 11:21 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>
>
> Am 24.05.20 um 11:10 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> > It's not that I think it would be good
Hi Rory, all
> On May 24, 2020 8:20 AM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> Best to rephrase: reads most file types of major competitors.
>
> I say "most" to allow for occasional inabilities to read some .docx and
> perhaps others not yet developed.
Since you are (and correctly so) referring to file
Hi,
On the said page i.e.
https://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html#why-apache-openoffice
there is a statement:
"With a fully open development process,
Apache OpenOffice has nothing to hide - the product stands or falls on its
reputation".
To take "one step at a time" and not to lose sight
Am 24.05.20 um 11:10 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
It's not that I think it would be good to use OOXML (I mean instead of ODF),
it's just that users need this feature.
Nobody thinks OOXML is an unimportant feature. I have not seen anyone
against it. We have already multiple Ideas how to close the
> -Original Message-
> From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 10:42 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2020 10:30:58 +0200
> Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
> > > -Original
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2020 9:24 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [calc] Re: AutoInput disabled at default
>
> Am 23.05.20 um 19:01 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >> On May 23, 2020 5:43 PM Peter Kovacs
On Sun, 24 May 2020 10:30:58 +0200
Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie]
> > Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 9:20 AM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
> >
> > On Sat, 23 May 2020
> -Original Message-
> From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 9:20 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>
> On Sat, 23 May 2020 22:34:03 +0200
> Czesław Wolański wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apache
+1
Am 24.05.20 um 10:05 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
Hi,
Thank you very much for explanation and far-sighted proposal. I hope others
will agree and I might finally enjoy peace of mind for...
"Roma locuta, causa finita" [1]. ;‑)
Kind regards,
Czesław
[1]
Hi,
Thank you very much for explanation and far-sighted proposal. I hope others
will agree and I might finally enjoy peace of mind for...
"Roma locuta, causa finita" [1]. ;‑)
Kind regards,
Czesław
[1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Roma_locuta,_causa_finita
Am So., 24. Mai 2020 um 09:20
On Sat, 23 May 2020 22:34:03 +0200
Czesław Wolański wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache OpenOffice Product Description, section "Why Apache OpenOffice?"
>
> https://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html#why-apache-openoffice
>
> Not being a native English speaker I have some doubts about one part (2nd
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
