On 12/28/13 7:59 PM, jan i wrote:
> On 28 December 2013 19:52, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>> wrote:
>>> On 17/12/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I don't know what others think but based on this new information I would
like to move my proposed
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> Is it any benefit to just release language packs for the new languages
>> since 4.0 as opposed to a full version IN a language -- assuming we want
>> to
>> get these out sooner than the next major release date?
>>
>
Kay Schenk wrote:
Is it any benefit to just release language packs for the new languages
since 4.0 as opposed to a full version IN a language -- assuming we want to
get these out sooner than the next major release date?
No benefit. The process would be the same. And breaking the symmetry
(rele
Is it any benefit to just release language packs for the new languages
since 4.0 as opposed to a full version IN a language -- assuming we want to
get these out sooner than the next major release date?
I don't know what the process would be for this.
ref: http://markmail.org/message/votu6o2cwzkre
I update the AOO 4.1 Release Planning [1] to sync the schedule in
discussion here, it is mainly based on Juergen's proposal on Dec 17 with
QE's comments.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Planning
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:59 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 28 Dece
On 28 December 2013 19:52, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
> > On 17/12/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't know what others think but based on this new information I would
> >> like to move my proposed schedule a little bit.
> >> Jan 24, 201
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 17/12/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> I don't know what others think but based on this new information I would
>> like to move my proposed schedule a little bit.
>> Jan 24, 2014 feature freeze
>> Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze ...
>>
On 17/12/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I don't know what others think but based on this new information I would
like to move my proposed schedule a little bit.
Jan 24, 2014 feature freeze
Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze ...
Mar 21, 2014 RC1?
Apr 1, 2014 GA? (I like this date if possible)
In gener
>Feb ??, 2014 feature FVT finish (I know in China is public holiday as
well from Jan 31 - Feb 7)
QA needs about 70 PD to complete the left 1061 executions (total 1061,
suppose 15 executions per day per QA volunteer being concentrated on this
work) on Writer(140), Calc(330) and Impress(591). We sta
On 12/17/13 3:54 PM, FR web forum wrote:
>> no, as far as I know their are no UI changes. I plan an update of the
>> released languages and new languages based on the aoo40 to integrate fixes.
> I thought that new features like Accessibility Support could be documented in
> help file.
> So, we hav
>no, as far as I know their are no UI changes. I plan an update of the
>released languages and new languages based on the aoo40 to integrate fixes.
I thought that new features like Accessibility Support could be documented in
help file.
So, we have missing strings:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/s
On 12/17/13 3:18 PM, jan i wrote:
> On 17 December 2013 15:12, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 12/17/13 3:00 PM, FR web forum wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze
>>> Did you set an aoo41 folder in Pootle?
>>
>> no, as far as I know their are no UI changes. I plan an update of
On 17 December 2013 15:12, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 12/17/13 3:00 PM, FR web forum wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >> Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze
> > Did you set an aoo41 folder in Pootle?
>
> no, as far as I know their are no UI changes. I plan an update of the
> released languages and new languag
On 12/17/13 3:00 PM, FR web forum wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze
> Did you set an aoo41 folder in Pootle?
no, as far as I know their are no UI changes. I plan an update of the
released languages and new languages based on the aoo40 to integrate fixes.
Ideally people who mad
On 17 December 2013 15:00, FR web forum wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze
> Did you set an aoo41 folder in Pootle?
>
no need to make a new project, just use the existing one.
rgds
jan I.
>
> -
> To unsubscri
Hello,
>Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze
Did you set an aoo41 folder in Pootle?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Hi,
well it seems that I was a little bit to optimistic or do I need a
break? I don't know probably both but I talked with the developers in my
direct surrounding field and taking the Christmas break, vacation etc.
into account we believe that my proposal was a little bit to optimistic.
I don't k
On 12/9/13 7:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> some time ago we have discussed a language only release on base of
>> 4.0.1. And even a language release requires a lot of work. Until today I
>> see 3 potential languages ready which is not en
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some time ago we have discussed a language only release on base of
> 4.0.1. And even a language release requires a lot of work. Until today I
> see 3 potential languages ready which is not enough from my perspective.
+1
> But on the
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some time ago we have discussed a language only release on base of
> 4.0.1. And even a language release requires a lot of work. Until today I
> see 3 potential languages ready which is not enough from my perspective.
> But on the oth
Hi,
some time ago we have discussed a language only release on base of
4.0.1. And even a language release requires a lot of work. Until today I
see 3 potential languages ready which is not enough from my perspective.
But on the other side we have some nice stuff in place that should be
released as
21 matches
Mail list logo
