Relying on jars, IMHO, is not bad, but it depends on your goals.
The point of compiling from source is that it's a first step to
actually being a developer which is why I do it. Compiling problems
aren't problems for us new developers they are puzzles to solve to
help people out.
If there are
On 02/13/2013 12:48 PM, Fred Ollinger wrote:
Relying on jars, IMHO, is not bad, but it depends on your goals.
The point of compiling from source is that it's a first step to
actually being a developer which is why I do it. Compiling problems
aren't problems for us new developers they are
On 02/12/2013 12:01 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:37:35PM -0500, Michael Lam wrote:
I have updated the external_deps.lst with the updated hsqldb
information. If someone can give me some pointer into how to just
retrieve the jar instead of the source
You don't
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:59:02PM -0500, Michael Lam wrote:
On 02/12/2013 12:01 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:37:35PM -0500, Michael Lam wrote:
I have updated the external_deps.lst with the updated hsqldb
information. If someone can give me some
On 02/06/2013 03:58 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Feb 5, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Is there any recommendation/objection on this? After hsqldb I would
like to move on to lucene.
In this case, it would be nice to investigate if lucence can be replaced
by clucene, this will
On 02/06/2013 12:50 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 02/06/2013 06:15 AM, Michael Lam wrote:
On 02/06/2013 05:57 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
I just saw that Ariel had already provided an excellent answer when I
had trouble with my mail connection. Sorry about that.
On 06.02.2013 11:49, Herbert Duerr
Hi Michael,
On 11.02.2013 17:21, Michael Lam wrote:
I have successfully test hsqldb-2.2.9 against the following 4 issues and
it is functioning correctly:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=96823
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=103528
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 11.02.2013 17:21, Michael Lam wrote:
I have successfully test hsqldb-2.2.9 against the following 4 issues and
it is functioning correctly:
On 02/11/2013 01:16 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 11.02.2013 17:21, Michael Lam wrote:
I have successfully test hsqldb-2.2.9 against the following 4 issues and
it is functioning correctly:
I'll help with testing java 6 and java 7 from Oracle.
I vote for keeping up with latest and greatest, but we should also
respect that many distros are probably going to ship java 6 for a
while.
Thus, we should probably work with both then officially deprecated
java6 when it's time.
Fred
On
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Michael Lam mnsyl4...@verizon.net wrote:
It is partially to address the JDK issue but there have been improvements
in HSQLDB for both performance and conformance that would be helpful which
is why I lean more towards updating to the latest rather than patching
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Fred Ollinger folli...@gmail.com wrote:
but we should also
respect that many distros are probably going to ship java 6 for a
while.
for example?
FC
Haha, I don't know. I could be wrong.
I'm not trying to start a debate, but I'm just trying help to get
things working on as many current distros as possible.
Best Wishes,
Fred
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Fred
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Fred Ollinger folli...@gmail.com wrote:
Haha, I don't know. I could be wrong.
OpenJDK 7 is the current version, OpenJDK 8 is coming along nicely.
OpenJDK 6 is the past. Yes, there' s been some RedHat volunteers saying
they' ll keep releasing OpenJDK 6 updates
OK, I won't build with java6 anymore then.
Fred
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Fred Ollinger folli...@gmail.com wrote:
Haha, I don't know. I could be wrong.
OpenJDK 7 is the current version, OpenJDK 8 is coming
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Fred Ollinger folli...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I won't build with java6 anymore then.
don' t get me wrong, I don' t want to influence your decissions one way or
the other.
For sure there's a lot of openjdk 6 installed out there.
My point was that, going forward,
On 02/11/2013 02:19 PM, Fred Ollinger wrote:
OK, I won't build with java6 anymore then.
Fred
More than likely no need unless certain sites/people refuse to update to
java 1.7. I really can't imagine who that would be at this point.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Fernando Cassia
On 02/11/2013 05:43 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 02/11/2013 02:19 PM, Fred Ollinger wrote:
OK, I won't build with java6 anymore then.
Fred
More than likely no need unless certain sites/people refuse to update
to java 1.7. I really can't imagine who that would be at this point.
On Mon, Feb
I am guessing my next steps would be looking into updating the build to
pull the jar?
Better use the mechanism provided by main/external_deps.lst
Herbert
I have updated the external_deps.lst with the updated hsqldb
information. If someone can give me some pointer into how to just
retrieve
Hi Michael,
On 06.02.2013 04:06, Michael Lam wrote:
I would like to update some of the Java libraries used, starting with
hsqldb. Is there any preference to getting the source and building the
jar or just grabbing the jar from the project site?
Some other Apache projects are redistributing
On 02/06/2013 05:57 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
I just saw that Ariel had already provided an excellent answer when I
had trouble with my mail connection. Sorry about that.
On 06.02.2013 11:49, Herbert Duerr wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 06.02.2013 04:06, Michael Lam wrote:
I would like to update some
On 02/06/2013 06:15 AM, Michael Lam wrote:
On 02/06/2013 05:57 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
I just saw that Ariel had already provided an excellent answer when I
had trouble with my mail connection. Sorry about that.
On 06.02.2013 11:49, Herbert Duerr wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 06.02.2013 04:06,
On 02/06/2013 12:50 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 02/06/2013 06:15 AM, Michael Lam wrote:
On 02/06/2013 05:57 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
I just saw that Ariel had already provided an excellent answer when I
had trouble with my mail connection. Sorry about that.
On 06.02.2013 11:49, Herbert Duerr
On Feb 5, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Is there any recommendation/objection on this? After hsqldb I would
like to move on to lucene.
In this case, it would be nice to investigate if lucence can be replaced
by clucene, this will reduce the need of installing Java for
24 matches
Mail list logo
