>That issue is assigned to "o...@erack.de", so you don't find it
>with a
>search for "is" ooo.
>
>In general BZ allows a "real name" (display name) as well as the
>account ID. For example my ID is "robw...@apache.org", but my
>display name is "Rob Weir". You should be searching for the
>uniqu
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 4:43 PM, wrote:
>>Can you point me to an
>>issue where the Assignee field is equal to "ooo"?
>
> I don't get it. When I choose "is" and type ooo in the "Search by people"
> section I also get NULL results.
> But when I choose contains, I get some reports which are assigne
>Can you point me to an
>issue where the Assignee field is equal to "ooo"?
I don't get it. When I choose "is" and type ooo in the "Search by people"
section I also get NULL results.
But when I choose contains, I get some reports which are assigned to ooo.
for example https://issues.apache.org/ooo
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 7:59 AM, wrote:
>>Can you give a link to a defect report from "ooo" that is
>>incorrectly
>>showing up in your query?
>
> The problem is not : reports from ooo incorrectly showing up.
> But: reports that should showing up, are not showing up (like reports from
> os_ooo, m
btw. is there a difference between you executing some batch operations on the
assignee field and me doing that manually?
Won't the amount of emails be the same?
So it does not matter if the assignee-resetting is done manually or via a batch
command?
thx
>Can you give a link to a defect report from "ooo" that is
>incorrectly
>showing up in your query?
The problem is not : reports from ooo incorrectly showing up.
But: reports that should showing up, are not showing up (like reports from
os_ooo, mst.ooo and wuyan.ooorg)
So every report containing
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:12 PM, wrote:
>>What exactly are you looking for? We don't have any user with ID
>>that
>>matches that regular expression, e.g., a line starting with "ooo"
>>followed immediately by a line end.
>
> I was trying to use ^ as a beginning of a string and $ as the end of a
>What exactly are you looking for? We don't have any user with ID
>that
>matches that regular expression, e.g., a line starting with "ooo"
>followed immediately by a line end.
I was trying to use ^ as a beginning of a string and $ as the end of a string.
To tell BZ that I just want ooo and noth
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:39 AM, wrote:
>>I'd use the "Search by People" section. The first of the three
>>groups
>
> The problem is, in the final step (atm I'm just tinkering) I want to exclude
> more than three assignees from the search.
> some of the assignees I'd like to exclude:
> openoffi
>I'd use the "Search by People" section. The first of the three
>groups
The problem is, in the final step (atm I'm just tinkering) I want to exclude
more than three assignees from the search.
some of the assignees I'd like to exclude:
openoffice
ooo
"AOO security list"
issues
secur...@openoffi
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:50 PM, wrote:
>>> You can use the criterion "Time Since Assignee Touched" "is
>>>greater than"
> Did not see that thanks.
>
>>Back in July I reset the assignment for all issues that had not
>>changed in more than 2000 days.
>
> Today is September 26, 2013 so that means t
>> You can use the criterion "Time Since Assignee Touched" "is
>>greater than"
Did not see that thanks.
>Back in July I reset the assignment for all issues that had not
>changed in more than 2000 days.
Today is September 26, 2013 so that means that 2000 days before today would be
April 5, 2008.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bugreporte...@hushmail.com schrieb:
>
>> Stop! Don't invoke the bugzilla guru.
>> Looks like I made it. Will invastigate farther.
>> That's what I use now:
>> http://img18.imageshack.us/i/vk57.png/
>>
>> Are there other assignees we
Hi,
bugreporte...@hushmail.com schrieb:
Stop! Don't invoke the bugzilla guru.
Looks like I made it. Will invastigate farther.
That's what I use now:
http://img18.imageshack.us/i/vk57.png/
Are there other assignees we should exclude?
You can use the criterion "Time Since Assignee Touched" "is
FALL,
I just tried to exclude some assignees like "ooo" but it does not work for me.
When I try to search just for bugs with "ooo" as the assignee I get no bugs.
But there are bugs with this assignee like:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Sep 25, 2013 11:28 AM, wrote:
>
> Stop! Don't invoke the bugzilla guru.
> Looks like I made it. Will invastigate farther.
> That's what I use now:
> http://img18.imageshack.us/i/vk57.png/
>
> Are there other assignees we should exclude?
congrats that looks very correct and complete to me. Then
Stop! Don't invoke the bugzilla guru.
Looks like I made it. Will invastigate farther.
That's what I use now:
http://img18.imageshack.us/i/vk57.png/
Are there other assignees we should exclude?
On 25.09.2013 at 10:58 AM, bugreporte...@hushmail.com wrote:
>
>>...Rob weir is the real bugzilla guru
>...Rob weir is the real bugzilla guru
Can you tell me how to invoke a bugzilla guru? Or is he already seeing this and
just has too much work to do?
>I think you need to use "search by change history".
But in "search by change history" one only can search for changes (at least
that's what I was
On 24 September 2013 16:37, wrote:
>
> >last modified older and a year and assigned to a person)
> ...
> >...if you did the unassignment,
>
> Well I can not promise to do this but at least I could try.
> So trying to achieve this behaviour I tried the Advanced Search on
> bugzilla and it did not
>last modified older and a year and assigned to a person)
...
>...if you did the unassignment,
Well I can not promise to do this but at least I could try.
So trying to achieve this behaviour I tried the Advanced Search on bugzilla and
it did not work.
How to get the "was modified" in the search
On 24 September 2013 12:36, wrote:
> Thanks.
> Haven't seen that.
> Can you tell me what "...for issues that had not been worked on for 6
> month..." means?
>
Sorry I wrote 6 month it is actually 1year (as written in the comments)
> Cause for example the bug
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/sho
Thanks.
Haven't seen that.
Can you tell me what "...for issues that had not been worked on for 6 month..."
means?
Cause for example the bug https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=20525
was reported 2003-10-01 01:18 UTC by ulim and the last post/comment was from
"mkca 2007-05-03 12:24:50
Please have a look at
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122035that bug deals
with this specific issue.
rgds
jan I.
On 23 September 2013 18:54, janI wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23 September 2013 16:19, Raphael Bircher wrote:
>
>> Hello bugreporter
>>
>> Am 23.09.13 12:45, schrieb bugreporte
On 23 September 2013 16:19, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hello bugreporter
>
> Am 23.09.13 12:45, schrieb bugreporte...@hushmail.com:
>
> That's awesome Andrea, many thanks.
>>
>> Can someone tell me if it's a good idea to find out which devs do not
>> work on AOO and are still assigned to bugs, and
Hello bugreporter
Am 23.09.13 12:45, schrieb bugreporte...@hushmail.com:
That's awesome Andrea, many thanks.
Can someone tell me if it's a good idea to find out which devs do not work on AOO and are
still assigned to bugs, and remove them from the bugs "Assigned To:"
field?
This is a good ide
That's awesome Andrea, many thanks.
Can someone tell me if it's a good idea to find out which devs do not work on
AOO and are still assigned to bugs, and remove them from the bugs "Assigned To:"
field?
I was thinking of something like this:
#1 get all emailaddresses from the devs which are assign
On 13/09/2013 bugreporter99 wrote:
I tried to change that field when logged in (yes, it's a different userid).
Does the issue has be reported by me to be able to change the fields?
In general it shouldn't, and if you need permissions you can obtain them
by simply asking on the QA list (or here
>You have to be logged in for doing that. There is no userid
>"bugreporter99" and there are no issues mentioning this userid
>[1]. What
>is your userid in AOO's bugzilla?
I tried to change that field when logged in (yes, it's a different userid).
Does the issue has be reported by me to be able
On 12.09.2013 11:34, bugreporte...@hushmail.com wrote:
Can someone please tell me how to change the "Latest Confirmation on:" field in
a bug report on bugzilla?
You have to be logged in for doing that. There is no userid
"bugreporter99" and there are no issues mentioning this userid [1]. What
Can someone please tell me how to change the "Latest Confirmation on:" field in
a bug report on bugzilla?
Don't get me wrong but can someone also tell me if Oliver Specht is still
working on OpenOffice cause the first bug is from 2003?
(don't know if there is a chance that on the way OO->Oracle->
>> I marked the duplicate issues you suggested. Please log in and
>update the
>> version on your own if you would. If there is some problem you
>can't do
>> this, please let us know.
thanks
>For re-confirming issues such as 107063 we have the field "latest
>confirmation on". The version field
On 08.09.2013 23:38, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 6:55 AM, wrote:
Can someone please set the bugs:
26331
20525
as duplicate of:
107063
And change the "Version" of 107063 to 4.0.1.
I tested this on Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.1_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe on XP
and this bug still occurs.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 6:55 AM, wrote:
> Can someone please set the bugs:
> 26331
> 20525
> as duplicate of:
> 107063
>
> And change the "Version" of 107063 to 4.0.1.
> I tested this on Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.1_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe on XP
> and this bug still occurs.
> (tested with frames of
Can someone please set the bugs:
26331
20525
as duplicate of:
107063
And change the "Version" of 107063 to 4.0.1.
I tested this on Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.1_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe on XP and
this bug still occurs.
(tested with frames of images and tables)
thx
-
34 matches
Mail list logo
