oooforum opened a new pull request, #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/159
Fix for F1 helpfile: https for HSQL website URL
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
oooforum closed pull request #32: Fix for issue #127897
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/32
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e
oooforum commented on PR #151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/151#issuecomment-1262233279
Somebody can push it this fix?
It will be fine to have this in the next builds.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
oooforum commented on PR #151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/151#issuecomment-1151995625
Simple, read the BZ report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114497
and apply instructions from comment #37
Before, we can not use smtp with SSL protocol (like GMail account
oooforum opened a new pull request, #151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/151
Thanks to hanya for this patch
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
oooforum commented on pull request #47:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/47#issuecomment-1061613628
Done!
Closed previous and opened a new PR:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/63
:-)
- Mail original -
> De: "Matthia
oooforum opened a new pull request #63:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/63
Minor changes for Windows versions
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
oooforum commented on pull request #47:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/47#issuecomment-1061605317
OK hyperlink for XRay has been fixed in the meantime
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
oooforum closed pull request #47:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/47
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
Hello,
Anybody to commit this PR?
We have a lot of users who ask us if AOO is compatible with Windows 11.
Thanks
- Mail transféré -
De: "GitBox"
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Mardi 15 Février 2022 19:36:32
Objet: [GitHub] [openoffice-org] oooforum commented on pull r
oooforum commented on pull request #47:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/47#issuecomment-1040008974
Minor changes with French L10n
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
oooforum commented on pull request #47:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/47#issuecomment-1040008974
Minor changes with French L10n
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
oooforum opened a new pull request #47:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/47
File has been localized on Wiki now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
oooforum commented on pull request #12:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/12#issuecomment-788739823
> Is there a bugzilla issue this is to?
I found this https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126
oooforum opened a new pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/3
Add charset to show these characters
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
oooforum opened a new pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org/pull/2
Change URL to restore the Basic picture
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
oooforum opened a new pull request #104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/104
Modify GetProductInfo function
Actually returns Product Name and Build version in one string
Example: OpenOffice4.1.7
Adding a space between these to split in two strings
Now: OpenOffice
oooforum edited a comment on pull request #12:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/12#issuecomment-685721846
> Is there a bugzilla issue this is to?
I don't think.
Steps to reproduce with Draw app:
1) Open a document and insert a shape
2) Right click an
oooforum edited a comment on pull request #12:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/12#issuecomment-685721846
> Is there a bugzilla issue this is to?
I don't think.
Steps to reproduce with Draw app:
1) Open a document and insert a shape
2) Right click an
oooforum commented on pull request #12:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/12#issuecomment-685721846
> Is there a bugzilla issue this is to?
I don't think.
Steps to reproduce with Draw app:
1) Open a document and insert a shape
2) Right click and select Des
oooforum opened a new pull request #88:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/88
Fix for issue #54923
Ctrl + > to increase
Ctrl + < to decrese
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
Sorry, I meant "can we give credit to the source." It appears it is DannyB.
And also from the oooForum, with particular title? Credit should be given on
wiki pages having the moved content.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com]
On 02/17/2015 11:31 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Just to inform the community that works with Python, I am in the process of
> moving some of the relevant code that used to be hosted on oooforum. Since
> the past issues with that forum I am copy-pasting the code to the mwiki so
&g
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:47 PM, jan i wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
>
> > On 17/02/2015 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:29 PM, jan i wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Alexandro Colorado
> wrote:
> >>>
> on a si
.com] On Behalf Of
> Alexandro Colorado
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:24
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Moving code from oooforum to mwiki
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> > Am 02/17/2015 08:56 PM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado:
> >
>
, and can we preserve
their attribution?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandro
Colorado
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:24
To: dev
Subject: Re: Moving code from oooforum to mwiki
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 17/02/2015 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:29 PM, jan i wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>>
on a sidenote, I wonder where is the code from the mwiki/forum/ and
oth
On 17/02/2015 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:29 PM, jan i wrote:
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
on a sidenote, I wonder where is the code from the mwiki/forum/ and other
sites on versioning system? I remember you announced you will put those
apps
> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Alexandro Colorado > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Just to inform the community that works with Python, I am in the
> > >> process of
> > >> > moving some of the relevant code that used to b
, February 17, 2015, Alexandro Colorado > wrote:
> >>
> >> > Just to inform the community that works with Python, I am in the
> >> process of
> >> > moving some of the relevant code that used to be hosted on oooforum.
> >> Since
> >>
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>>
>>> Just to inform the community that works with Python, I am in the process
>>>>
>>> of
>>>
>>>> moving some of the relevant code that used to be hosted on oooforum.
>>
Python, I am in the process
of
moving some of the relevant code that used to be hosted on oooforum.
Since
the past issues with that forum I am copy-pasting the code to the mwiki
so
it can be hosted so in case oooforum goes away forever, these code can
still be survived and reused.
Same is
2015 at 2:53 PM, jan i wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>
>> > Just to inform the community that works with Python, I am in the
>> process of
>> > moving some of the relevant code that used to be hosted on oooforum.
&
ote:
>
> > Just to inform the community that works with Python, I am in the process
> of
> > moving some of the relevant code that used to be hosted on oooforum.
> Since
> > the past issues with that forum I am copy-pasting the code to the mwiki
> so
> > it can
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Just to inform the community that works with Python, I am in the process of
> moving some of the relevant code that used to be hosted on oooforum. Since
> the past issues with that forum I am copy-pasting the code to the mwik
Just to inform the community that works with Python, I am in the process of
moving some of the relevant code that used to be hosted on oooforum. Since
the past issues with that forum I am copy-pasting the code to the mwiki so
it can be hosted so in case oooforum goes away forever, these code can
On 04/12/2014 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
wget doesnt preserve the links but do an html copy of the old website,
basically what you are asking from Ed.
No, it's much different. We want a fully working website: both the
database and files that are needed to clone the site. This keeps all
options
Side note: it seems that there is actually not much discussion.
Ed, it seems, is over-committed for his time, which is what caused the
problem with the forum in the first place. For now, I think most of the
time is spent waiting on Ed to consider his options and make a decision
about what he w
On 12/05/2014 08:34 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 05 Dec2014, at 19:41, Andreas Säger wrote:
Am 05.12.2014 um 01:15 schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak:
I did a scrape of the pages, and it is about 8GB last time I did it. Off
hand, I expect that a huge chunk of that is SPAM, especially since m
> On 05 Dec2014, at 19:41, Andreas Säger wrote:
>
> Am 05.12.2014 um 01:15 schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak:
>> I did a scrape of the pages, and it is about 8GB last time I did it. Off
>> hand, I expect that a huge chunk of that is SPAM, especially since most
>> of the SPAMS have large graphics i
Am 05.12.2014 um 01:15 schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak:
> I did a scrape of the pages, and it is about 8GB last time I did it. Off
> hand, I expect that a huge chunk of that is SPAM, especially since most
> of the SPAMS have large graphics included. I considered writing a PERL
> script to clean tha
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:15:54 -0500
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>
> On 12/04/2014 12:36 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >>
> >>> Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I woul
Well the next step would be to transfer this to apache and then do a
collaborative cleanup.
On Dec 4, 2014 6:16 PM, "Andrew Douglas Pitonyak"
wrote:
>
> On 12/04/2014 12:36 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti
>> wrote:
>>
>> Alexandro Colorado wro
On 12/04/2014 12:36 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would
suggest a public IRC meetup
This is not an official resource of the project, so the projec
On 12/4/14, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 04/12/2014 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>> Seems the domain already expire.
>
> This would not be an issue in itself. Yes, it would be good to preserve
> the old links, but preserving knowledge is better. So if we can get the
> dump and files from Ed we can set
On 04/12/2014 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Seems the domain already expire.
This would not be an issue in itself. Yes, it would be good to preserve
the old links, but preserving knowledge is better. So if we can get the
dump and files from Ed we can setup the forum at Apache and give it a
new U
Seems the domain already expire.
On 12/4/14, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> I could use people.apache.org a df shows me 1.2tb free
> Not sure if there is a quota for my user
> I could wget the whole site.
> On Dec 4, 2014 1:13 PM, "jan i" wrote:
>
>> On 4 December 2014 at 18:36, Alexandro Colorado
I could use people.apache.org a df shows me 1.2tb free
Not sure if there is a quota for my user
I could wget the whole site.
On Dec 4, 2014 1:13 PM, "jan i" wrote:
> On 4 December 2014 at 18:36, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti
> > wrote:
> >
> >
Is a rough estimate and yeah 100g will be a good 4 to 8 days. But a, I
don't think it will come to 100g and b, the process will be between servers
so it shouldn't be an issue.
I could rent a vps with 100g for 4 days but then it would need additionally
4 more days to transfer to apache. If I put it
On 4 December 2014 at 18:36, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
>
> > Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >
> >> Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would
> >> suggest a public IRC meetup
> >>
> >
> > This is not an official res
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would
>> suggest a public IRC meetup
>>
>
> This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying
> to help simply as a benefit
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would
suggest a public IRC meetup
This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is
trying to help simply as a benefit to existing users. Edward, who owns
the domain name, was cooperative a
Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would
suggest a public IRC meetup to clear all the issues, and fast-track to
a conclusion and actions.
On 12/4/14, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> For information: the old forum (oooforum.org) is currently flagged as
> follows
>
> "NOTICE: This
For information: the old forum (oooforum.org) is currently flagged as follows
"NOTICE: This domain name expired on 02/12/2014 and is pending renewal or
deletion."
This might be an appropriate time to renew/continue earlier discussions .
--
Rory O'Farrell
d as a static site.
On 10/27/14, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak mailto:and...@pitonyak.org>> wrote:
On 10/27/2014 07:16 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
The conversation kinda went away and wonder what was
the resolution
about the
die. Lots of information there,
>> even if the site is held as a static site.
>>
>> On 10/27/14, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/27/2014 07:16 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>>
>>>> The conversation kinda went away and wonder what was
oooforum and if there is any hope to recover the database at
least to get some kind of plain browsable dump of the content.
Regards.
There was some discussion on the AOO private list, but I am not on that
list. I was copied for some of the stuff. Since I have heard nothing, my
guess is that the
;> about the oooforum and if there is any hope to recover the database at
>> least to get some kind of plain browsable dump of the content.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
> There was some discussion on the AOO private list, but I am not on that
> list. I was copied for some of the stu
On 10/27/2014 07:16 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
The conversation kinda went away and wonder what was the resolution
about the oooforum and if there is any hope to recover the database at
least to get some kind of plain browsable dump of the content.
Regards.
There was some discussion on the
The conversation kinda went away and wonder what was the resolution
about the oooforum and if there is any hope to recover the database at
least to get some kind of plain browsable dump of the content.
Regards.
--
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C
on the official forum since
it works well and is performs quickly
On 09/03/2014 05:43 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Sorry the way I understood you couldnt work confortable at oooforum
because of its unresponsiveness. So I suggest using the official
forums to test the iMacros until they are up there
ote:
Sorry the way I understood you couldnt work confortable at oooforum
because of its unresponsiveness. So I suggest using the official
forums to test the iMacros until they are up there to perform all the
tasks.
But I most have missed something.
Regards.
On 9/3/14, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak w
Sorry the way I understood you couldnt work confortable at oooforum
because of its unresponsiveness. So I suggest using the official
forums to test the iMacros until they are up there to perform all the
tasks.
But I most have missed something.
Regards.
On 9/3/14, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote
The next version of the forum software used by oooforum supports
deleting all posts by the user. Also, there is an add-on for the version
2 (I think) that also supports this.
The official forum runs great, no need to test there. It is sufficiently
moderated that there are no particular issues
For the record, you could do this also on our forums at
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/
This will give you a fast server to work on until oooforum is back in
shape. Trying to delete your own post could do the trick enough to
test it.
On 9/3/14, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> I agree, sorry to
I agree, sorry to see the sad state of the forum. Maybe all this
should be let known to the owner so he can take measurses. I dont
think anyone want to see oooforum go.
On 9/3/14, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
> Yeah, even when I build an iMacro to remove a single post based on a
> hard
Yeah, even when I build an iMacro to remove a single post based on a
hard coded URL, oooforum is so slow, that it fails to respond in 60
seconds after saying "yes, remove that like I asked" and then the macro
itself stops running. I set the timeout to 10 minutes, will see if that
is
dmin as well as a regular user. While displaying a thread,
there is an admin link that allows me to remove the thread and there is
a link to remove each post in the thread. There is also a link on the
bottom of each thread to navigate to a special admin page that provides
some extra functions such as dele
e posts, I use the regular search. The returned list is the
same for an admin as well as a regular user. While displaying a thread,
there is an admin link that allows me to remove the thread and there is
a link to remove each post in the thread. There is also a link on the
bottom of each thread to navi
ser does
> not remove their posts).
I did an excercise and try deleting my own posts from oooforum. I see
what you mean (and what I was missing). There is no checkbox to mark
all the posts like it would be on -- let say -- the PM page where a
checkbox is able to mass delete all links.
I unders
There is very little difference between what an admin and a user sees in
this context.
To find the posts, I use the regular search. The returned list is the
same for an admin as well as a regular user. While displaying a thread,
there is an admin link that allows me to remove the thread and th
Unfortunately I dont admin any forum to see what you are seen, so I only
have access to the forum search engine but I know that the Admin (the one
able to delete the forum) is a different view.
I know the individual post url is on a (very small) icon next to the Posted
date. If you search for 'Pos
On 09/01/2014 03:15 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Yup my idea is that you have an array with the spam users, perform a search
on them, and then fill out the page with the posts related to the spam
users, and just have the macros select all checkboxes and press the delete,
and go to the next page.
Yup my idea is that you have an array with the spam users, perform a search
on them, and then fill out the page with the posts related to the spam
users, and just have the macros select all checkboxes and press the delete,
and go to the next page. That would allow you to get all the spam from that
I am looking at iMacro, thanks for the suggestion. My initial attempts
this morning have failed because it seems to want a concrete starting
URL. So, when I recorded a script to delete the currently displayed
spam, what it really recorded was "navigate to the current URL", now do
what you wan
This might sound a bit out there, but a greasemonkey script can be done to
program the check out and delete of all the post related to the handful of
nicks.
That way it could automated and ran all night.
Another extension is iMacros
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/imacros-for-firefox
Although I am able to remove the account, all that does is convert the
posts to have a "guest" user. I wish it did remove the posts as well.
On 08/31/2014 09:41 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Can't you just remove the spamer account with all his posts?
On 8/31/14, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote
Can't you just remove the spamer account with all his posts?
On 8/31/14, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
> More accurately, the owner is generally non-responsive (he is really
> busy and does not have much time for a hobby forum).
>
> The forum is currently hosted on machines that prevent him from
More accurately, the owner is generally non-responsive (he is really
busy and does not have much time for a hobby forum).
The forum is currently hosted on machines that prevent him from granting
admin rights to the forum proper and I assume that he does not have
things properly virtualized to
So you got feedback from them, and they denied?
I mean this forum could need some help, the download widget on the
cover still point to 2.4.0 and many links are abandoned projects like
OOoMath and such.
On 8/31/14, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 31/08/2014 Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 Aug 20
On 31/08/2014 Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:41:29 -0500 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
I can volunteer to admin the forum and police it for spam.
As I recollect the flood of spam was such that it defeated several
experienced moderators working together. It may be impossible for one
m
own.
>
> On 8/31/14, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> > Can you provide a URL.
> >
> > On 8/31/14, Hagar Delest wrote:
> >> For the record, I could access oooforum today but full of spam at least
> >> for
> >> the first 15 pages in each section!
> &g
I can volunteer to admin the forum and police it for spam.
On 8/31/14, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Can you provide a URL.
>
> On 8/31/14, Hagar Delest wrote:
>> For the record, I could access oooforum today but full of spam at least
>> for
>> the first 15 pages i
Can you provide a URL.
On 8/31/14, Hagar Delest wrote:
> For the record, I could access oooforum today but full of spam at least for
> the first 15 pages in each section!
>
> Hagar
>
> Le 24/08/2014 05:21, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak a écrit :
>>
>> On 08/23/2014 1
For the record, I could access oooforum today but full of spam at least for the
first 15 pages in each section!
Hagar
Le 24/08/2014 05:21, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak a écrit :
On 08/23/2014 10:16 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 20/08/2014 Mathias Röllig wrote:
https://www.openoffice.org/support
On 08/23/2014 10:16 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 20/08/2014 Mathias Röllig wrote:
https://www.openoffice.org/support/ links to www.oooforum.org (The
(Unofficial) OpenOffice Forum) but it seems down.
If so (permanent down) the link should be deleted.
It is not permanently down, but indeed I e
On 20/08/2014 Mathias Röllig wrote:
https://www.openoffice.org/support/ links to www.oooforum.org (The
(Unofficial) OpenOffice Forum) but it seems down.
If so (permanent down) the link should be deleted.
It is not permanently down, but indeed I edited the page to say it's
currently offline. Yo
Hello!
https://www.openoffice.org/support/ links to www.oooforum.org (The
(Unofficial) OpenOffice Forum) but it seems down.
If so (permanent down) the link should be deleted.
Greetings, Mathias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
On 07/14/2014 01:52 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/14/2014 02:07 AM, schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak:
On 07/13/2014 07:02 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I'm sure that someone will react. That's the goal. ;-)
OK Marcus, I dropped an email to that list. If you have any pull over
there, please do what
Am 07/14/2014 02:07 AM, schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak:
On 07/13/2014 07:02 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I'm sure that someone will react. That's the goal. ;-)
OK Marcus, I dropped an email to that list. If you have any pull over
there, please do what you can to move this along. I really want thi
On 07/13/2014 07:02 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I'm sure that someone will react. That's the goal. ;-)
OK Marcus, I dropped an email to that list. If you have any pull over
there, please do what you can to move this along. I really want this
data to be made available again.
--
Andrew Pitonyak
Am 07/14/2014 12:49 AM, schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak:
On 07/13/2014 04:58 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/13/2014 03:04 AM, schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak:
OK, I finally got off my backside and called The OOoForum owner.
Seems that he is alive, well, and very busy and was not even aware
On 07/13/2014 04:58 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/13/2014 03:04 AM, schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak:
OK, I finally got off my backside and called The OOoForum owner.
Seems that he is alive, well, and very busy and was not even aware that
the site was down.
He said that he obviously has not
Am 07/13/2014 03:04 AM, schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak:
OK, I finally got off my backside and called The OOoForum owner.
Seems that he is alive, well, and very busy and was not even aware that
the site was down.
He said that he obviously has not been doing a good job and is willing
to discuss
OK, I finally got off my backside and called The OOoForum owner.
Seems that he is alive, well, and very busy and was not even aware that
the site was down.
He said that he obviously has not been doing a good job and is willing
to discuss with the AOO team moving content and/or site. Let me
jan i wrote:
Just because the dns name expires the site remains active, adressable by ip
addr.
It's on shared hosting so one would still have to associate it to
207.7.148.2 in the hosts file or such, but indeed you make an important
point; oooforum.org is three things: a domain, a website and
On 06/28/2014 10:21 AM, jan i wrote:
On 28 June 2014 14:58, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 15/06/2014 Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 06/14/2014 05:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
It seems http://oooforum.org/ is still unresponsive. ...
Why do you need to hear from Ed before you mirror the d
On 28 June 2014 14:58, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 15/06/2014 Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>
>> On 06/14/2014 05:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> It seems http://oooforum.org/ is still unresponsive. ...
>>>
>> Why do you need to hear from Ed before you mirror the data. ... I
>>
>> did send
On 15/06/2014 Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 06/14/2014 05:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
It seems http://oooforum.org/ is still unresponsive. ...
Why do you need to hear from Ed before you mirror the data. ... I
did send an email to all of the email accounts that I have for him. If
he does n
t;
>>
>> It seems http://oooforum.org/ is still unresponsive. Of course, we can't
>> do anything about it: it's a third-party service, not under control of the
>> project and hosted on external hardware. Whatever we can do to
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
