Guy Waterval wrote:
I do not know if such a collaboration is allowed
by Apache
No problem. Apache won't pay developers directly, but it doesn't forbid
that developers are paid of course! So whoever is the sponsor, there is
no problem as long as the code is under the Apache License version 2 a
Hi Keith,
2017-10-14 5:52 GMT+02:00 Keith N. McKenna :
[...]
What is relevant is that having it
> functional would be a good enhancement to the product as well as
> provicing the potential of benefit to the project.
>
I entirely agree with your position an I have a suggestion.
Why not to try a
>Do we have a bug # for this longstanding issue? We still advertise this
>feature but it is not working since 4.1.0 (?).
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=wikipublisher
But none specific to this problem
-
To unsub
On 10/13/2017 2:43 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 06.10.2017 um 03:40 schrieb Don Lewis:
>
>> I think I understand what is going wrong with WikiPublisher on Windows.
>> The FreeBSD port sets the --with-system-apache-commons=yes, and lists
>> the all the commons-*.jar files as dependencies, so whe
Am 06.10.2017 um 03:40 schrieb Don Lewis:
> I think I understand what is going wrong with WikiPublisher on Windows.
> The FreeBSD port sets the --with-system-apache-commons=yes, and lists
> the all the commons-*.jar files as dependencies, so when AOO is
> installed on a machine, the commons-*.jar
On 4 Oct, To: dev@openoffice.apache.org wrote:
> On 4 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 9/30/2017 8:42
On 4 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel
On 10/4/2017 4:43 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 4 Oct, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 10/4/2017 3:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb
On 4 Oct, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 10/4/2017 3:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM
On 10/4/2017 3:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 29 Sep, Matth
On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> That might explain wh
On 10/4/2017 12:47 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> That migh
Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> That might explain why I have never seen a working WikiPublish
On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
That might explain why I have never seen a working WikiPublisher in the
last releases.
(Since at least 4.1.
Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> That might explain why I have never seen a working WikiPublisher in the
>>> last releases.
>>> (Since at least 4.1.2 we build with that option on Windows)
>>>
>>> The q
On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> That might explain why I have never seen a working WikiPublisher in the
>> last releases.
>> (Since at least 4.1.2 we build with that option on Windows)
>>
>> The question is: Do we need to build with that option if no on
that tomcat isn't
> getting built when --enable-wiki-publisher is specified is that the
> swext module doesn't list tomcat as a dependency. That said, I didn't
> find any references to servlet-api.jar in the swext module. The only
> references that I found in the tree w
've never tried to use it, so I don't know if it works or not.
I think I've figured out what is going on. The reason that tomcat isn't
getting built when --enable-wiki-publisher is specified is that the
swext module doesn't list tomcat as a dependency. That said, I didn&
ble the mediawiki option but don't specify
> --with-servlet-api-jar, then configure selects an internal copy of
> servlet-api.jar and appends TOMCAT to BUILD_TYPE, but the build never
> attempts to build the tomcat module (which will generate a copy of
> servlet-api.jar) or bundle
If we enable the mediawiki option but don't specify
--with-servlet-api-jar, then configure selects an internal copy of
servlet-api.jar and appends TOMCAT to BUILD_TYPE, but the build never
attempts to build the tomcat module (which will generate a copy of
servlet-api.jar) or bundle this .jar
20 matches
Mail list logo
