Kohei Yoshida wrote (8-11-2007 17:06)
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 16:47 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
Anyhow you certainly don´t want to break that semi-automatic process to
generate Release Notes and volunteer to offer to parse a few hundred
specifications in a few hundred different plain text based f
I am sorry for the misunderstanding, actually we have to copy the formatted
text from Frame to Frame and not from header/footer to frame.
any idea?
regards,
Sandeep
On 11/7/07, Oliver Specht - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sandeep Raghuvanshi wrote:
> > Hi All,
>
This is an extract of my code - I do not know, why the last code line
always fails any ideas ?
unoidl.com.sun.star.beans.XPropertySet propSet = null;
// We get a single cell which works without problems ...
unoidl.com.sun.star.table.XCell cell =
((unoidl.com.sun.star.table.XCellRange
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 16:47 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> Anyhow you certainly don´t want to break that semi-automatic process to
> generate Release Notes and volunteer to offer to parse a few hundred
> specifications in a few hundred different plain text based formats
So, is that true that we
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 16:47 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> Openoffice Development wrote:
> >
> >> A defined process !? By who? I thought we (Sun and non-Sun) agreed
> >> when we had that big spec process discussion back in 2006[1] that the
> >> format of the specification no longer matters, but t
Openoffice Development wrote:
A defined process !? By who? I thought we (Sun and non-Sun) agreed
when we had that big spec process discussion back in 2006[1] that the
format of the specification no longer matters, but the content does.
Someone even suggested that we write in plain text or jus
A defined process !? By who? I thought we (Sun and non-Sun) agreed
when we had that big spec process discussion back in 2006[1] that the
format of the specification no longer matters, but the content does.
Someone even suggested that we write in plain text or just in the issue
page. Did I mis
Hi,
Does someone have an open CWS that is UI relevant for OOo2.4, and is
willing to take care of
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82927#desc7
That would add several language list box entries for Sami to
svx/source/dialogs/langtab.src
Thanks
Eike
--
OOo/SO Calc core developer
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 12:14 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
> This process will break if developers do not use the correct templates
> which is a defined process for creating new specifications.
A defined process !? By who? I thought we (Sun and non-Sun) agreed
when we had that big spec process di
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 17:14 +, Caolan McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 17:32 +0100, Hans-Joachim Lankenau wrote:
> > hi!
> >
> > looks like version changes in assemblies happen outside of the source
> > code (no further comment...). so ccache takes the cached object as the
> > code did
Hi there!
I just stumbled over this Page (
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Calc/Features/DataPilot_drill-down_on_data_field
) in the OO Wiki which someone seemed to be trying to use as a
specification URL in EIS.
We have an semi-automated processes around specifications and EIS
Da
11 matches
Mail list logo
