On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 16:47 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote: > Openoffice Development wrote: > > > >> A defined process !? By who? I thought we (Sun and non-Sun) agreed > >> when we had that big spec process discussion back in 2006[1] that the > >> format of the specification no longer matters, but the content does. > >> Someone even suggested that we write in plain text or just in the issue > >> page. Did I miss any other "important" discussion that took place since > >> then? > >> > > I remember it otherwise and that was that the agreement was to use that > suggested template for Wiki Specifications, but I may be wrong. > > Anyhow you certainly don´t want to break that semi-automatic process to > generate Release Notes and volunteer to offer to parse a few hundred > specifications in a few hundred different plain text based formats by > sighting them manually for each new official user Release and each new > Developer Milestone instead. Or do you want to offer to do this kind of > work for OpenOffice.org? Or do you think we should just drop the most > important part of the Relases Motes at all which is to tell people which > new things they can expect from a Release and which main bugs have been > fixed, I certainly think you don't!
By the way, that feature is not yet ready, neither is its spec. It was going into 2.4 because you guys needed it (so Niklas put it in partically). So, I don't think I'm obligated to finish the spec when I don't even think it's ready. So, what do you suggest we do then? Kohei --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
