Hi Michael,
To me, this whole discussions seems to be about the
"bring it in quick (and sometimes dirty)"
vs.
"bring it in slow, but matured (though sometimes still dirty)"
controverse. It's a matter of taste, belief, and perhaps experience
which approach one prefers. You prefer the first on
Hi Niklas,
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:40 +0200, Niklas Nebel wrote:
> Michael Meeks wrote:
> > Let me show you why I feel this way, from a simple example I was
> > reading this morning: notice the consultation going on in this issue:
> >
> > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5620
Uwe Fischer wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Meeks wrote:
>> So - my experience is that the more people involved in a decision - the
>> less likely any decision is to be taken: consider the difficulty of
>> choosing a restaurant with 3 people vs. 10 people. "I don't like
>> Chinese", "I can'
David Wilson wrote:
Perhaps if at the bottom of every help page there was a email link with
"Please contact us about any any problems or suggestions with this help
topic. We want to make perfect.)" You would get more comments.
(Using the link should add the topic name and language and help ve
Hi David,
David Wilson wrote:
On Friday 20 October 2006 7:14 am, Michael Meeks wrote:
As I say, of the ~million or so users that have been exposed to the
outdated help in this area, none I know of have noticed or cared enough
to actually file a bug.
In general people are amazed when they
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote:
So - my experience is that the more people involved in a decision - the
less likely any decision is to be taken: consider the difficulty of
choosing a restaurant with 3 people vs. 10 people. "I don't like
Chinese", "I can't walk far", "I know this place .
Michael Meeks wrote:
Let me show you why I feel this way, from a simple example I was
reading this morning: notice the consultation going on in this issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56202
[snip]
--- Additional comments from nn Tue Apr 4 ... 2006 ---
Defau
On Friday 20 October 2006 7:14 am, Michael Meeks wrote:
> As I say, of the ~million or so users that have been exposed to the
> outdated help in this area, none I know of have noticed or cared enough
> to actually file a bug.
In general people are amazed when they find a help system actually
Hi Frank,
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 12:35 +0200, Frank Schönheit wrote:
> In this case, Uwe would have told you that various documentation would
> need to be updated, to keep the product consistent
So - my experience is that the more people involved in a decision - the
less likely any decisio
Hi Rüdiger,
> while you made some valid points, this one does not hold:
> 1) Timing of integration is not under control of CWS owner. Program
> Management is responsible here.
> 2) Integrating the CWS on 2006-10-06 is in time. UI freeze of 2006-10-05
> means that your CWS has to be approved by Q
Hi Frank,
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi Michael,
[...]
Other people could have told you that integrating the CWS on 2006-11-06,
one day after the UI freeze, could cause trouble with translation (I
don't think it did it this case).
while you made some valid points, this
Hi Michael,
Additional to the good points already raised by Mathias (which I agree
to in really every item), my opinion on this:
The general idea is: Involve people early, not after it's done and
integrated. Nobody can oversee *everything* alone, and if you ask other
stakeholders, they might have
Hi,
my mail first was written as a complaint on our StarOffice internal
board. I tried to get some internal answers on how to handle community
contributions where there is no clear statement whether and when the OOo
code will be included into StarOffice as well.
Then several people asked me to
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 13:50 +0200, Uwe Fischer wrote:
>> Don't get me wrong - I love this feature and I will never say anything
>> negative about Michael Meeks, who surely is a programming genius. ;-)
>
> Haha ;-) the sarcasm detector just exploded.
I d
Hi Uwe,
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 13:50 +0200, Uwe Fischer wrote:
> Don't get me wrong - I love this feature and I will never say anything
> negative about Michael Meeks, who surely is a programming genius. ;-)
Haha ;-) the sarcasm detector just exploded.
> How am I supposed to deliver a ti
OK, thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Eike Rathke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:09 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.org
> Subject: [dev] m187 (was: [dev] A word about (missing)
> Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails)
>
Hi Kirill,
On Wednesday, 2006-10-11 16:19:33 +0400, Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
> (Sorry for hijacking the thread)
You're lucky you weren't successfully achieving that because your
mailer-non-tool doesn't generate neither References nor In-Reply-To
headers ;-)
Anyway..
> Is m187 available outside
about (missing) Specification Documents
> and (late) Feature Mails
>
> Hi,
>
> today I installed build m187 on Solaris, and a new feature
> surprised me.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
Hi,
today I installed build m187 on Solaris, and a new feature surprised me.
Now StarOffice (may be also OOo) on Solaris / Gnome shows a working
Quickstarter, like previously only the Windows versions and some Linux
distributions did. Then I found the feature mail of last week by Michael
Meek
19 matches
Mail list logo
