Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Hi LiuTao, Thank you for your interest in helping. It is rather hard for me to give you any specific, small, self-contained tasks right now. Work is currently rather proceeding in a way of seeing what broke for OOo-wo-URE and then looking how to fix it. Anyway, I am expanding sb71 in two d

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

On 4/17/07, Stephan Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stephan Bergmann wrote: > FYI: < http://odftoolkit.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=32> See < http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ODF_Toolkit/Efforts/OOo_without_URE > for work on this. -Stephan Nice piece of work !!

Re: Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Hello Stephan, Glad to know that the CWSsd71 have been done and thanks for the following wiki page to describe the details of how these step was reached. I found the followling in the wiki page: Two kinds of changes are necessary: 1.Adapt the code so that it can work for an installation distribut

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 10:50 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > FYI: > > See > > > for work on this. That's most excelle

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Stephan Bergmann wrote: FYI: See for work on this. -Stephan - To unsubscr

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> I think if Rüdigers' concerns were still valid they would be a clear >> sign that the separation between the URE and OOo is not really done and >> that there are still too much dependencies. OTOH if both indeed are >> separated enough the necessary changes in the build e

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Mathias Bauer wrote: Stephan Bergmann schrieb: Mathias Bauer wrote: Rüdiger Timm schrieb: OK. If that's all, 'make it easy to build SDK and URE from scratch independently from OOo', than I am fully with you. It should be possible to check out just a needed subset of modules and build them. W

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Stephan Bergmann schrieb: > Mathias Bauer wrote: >> Rüdiger Timm schrieb: >>> OK. If that's all, 'make it easy to build SDK and URE from scratch >>> independently from OOo', than I am fully with you. It should be possible >>> to check out just a needed subset of modules and build them. Without t

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Mathias Bauer wrote: Rüdiger Timm schrieb: OK. If that's all, 'make it easy to build SDK and URE from scratch independently from OOo', than I am fully with you. It should be possible to check out just a needed subset of modules and build them. Without the need to go through the whole tree just

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Rüdiger Timm schrieb: > > Mathias Bauer wrote: >> Rüdiger Timm schrieb: >> >>> Caolan McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 09:54 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > FYI: [...] >>> Second reason is that (curently) t

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Mathias Bauer wrote: Rüdiger Timm schrieb: Caolan McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 09:54 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: FYI: [...] Second reason is that (curently) this does not fit our development stile. We do chi

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Rüdiger Timm schrieb: > > Caolan McNamara wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 09:54 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >>> FYI: >> >> Yeah, I'm very much in favour of this myself. Split the build into two >> parts the API stable ure s

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

Caolan McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 09:54 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: FYI: Yeah, I'm very much in favour of this myself. Split the build into two parts the API stable ure stuff, and the rest. I'm trying to home

Re: [dev] OOo w/o URE

On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 09:54 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > FYI: Yeah, I'm very much in favour of this myself. Split the build into two parts the API stable ure stuff, and the rest. I'm trying to home-brew some hackery to fake