Hi,
I was looking for the source code that is behind the
www.openstreetmap.org/browse functionality but could not find it. I'm
not a rails expert but I think that since I cannot find anything in
config/routes.rb, it is probably not implemented in rails, is it?
The reason is that I want to
Rolf Bode-Meyer wrote:
Hello!
I'm on my first steps with osmosis.
I managed to create a polygon file from the outer way on a
multipolygon in the OSM data. So osmosis now should extract exactly
the area bounded by that way. And indeed it mostly does, but some
nodes of the way of the
Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I was looking for the source code that is behind the
www.openstreetmap.org/browse functionality but could not find it. I'm
not a rails expert but I think that since I cannot find anything in
config/routes.rb, it is probably not implemented in rails, is it?
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/browser/sites/rails_port_branches/api06/app/controllers/browse_controller.rb
2009/2/3 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
I was looking for the source code that is behind the
www.openstreetmap.org/browse functionality but could not find it. I'm
not a rails
2009/2/3 Brett Henderson br...@bretth.com:
Check the definition of insideness in the above link, just because a point
lies on the boundary doesn't necessarily mean it will be considered inside
the shape.
Reading that and comparing the results I see they're matching. So I
comprehend what's
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Rolf Bode-Meyer rob...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/3 Brett Henderson br...@bretth.com:
Check the definition of insideness in the above link, just because a
point
lies on the boundary doesn't necessarily mean it will be considered
inside
the shape.
Reading
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 03:25:57AM +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote:
What is the motivation to go to the one value per key thing again.
Practically everything we have been doing with OSM tags until now has
assumed that keys are unique. Nearly all the software I have seen (like
editors, renderers,
Practically everything we have been doing with OSM tags until
now has
assumed that keys are unique. Nearly all the software I have
seen (like
editors, renderers, etc.) treat keys as if they are unique.
I wondered the other day when I was adding the tag for the
(maritime) museum to the
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org writes:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 03:25:57AM +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote:
What is the motivation to go to the one value per key thing again.
Practically everything we have been doing with OSM tags until now has
assumed that keys are unique. Nearly all the
Matthias Julius wrote:
Key uniqueness robs us of some cool things but we get simplicity in
return which is a price worth paying in this particular case, I think.
Using the misused thing called relations we are able to do most of the
things we want. But if there was a vote I would go for the
2009/2/3 Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net:
Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de writes:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
What is the motivation to go to the one value per key thing again.
Opposed to unique(objectid - key - value)?
As a client programmer, I say that unique keys
It's only a polygon because the tags say it is (polygon is not a
fundamental primitive object in OSM), and Osmosis is tag-agnostic.
Pleeease, add polygon as a fundamental primitive object in OSM!
You can take 'polygon' from Simple Features for SQL (see
Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de writes:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
What is the motivation to go to the one value per key thing again.
Opposed to unique(objectid - key - value)?
As a client programmer, I say that unique keys make everything simpler
for me. It is much
Rolf Bode-Meyer wrote:
Reading that and comparing the results I see they're matching. So I
comprehend what's going on.
But I must confess I don't agree that this is going on (though that
won't help anything I guess). Either one counts the whole border as
being part of the result or none of
Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de writes:
Matthias Julius wrote:
Key uniqueness robs us of some cool things but we get simplicity in
return which is a price worth paying in this particular case, I think.
Using the misused thing called relations we are able to do most of the
things we want.
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 00:30:42 +0100, Stefan Keller sfkel...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's only a polygon because the tags say it is (polygon is not a
fundamental primitive object in OSM), and Osmosis is tag-agnostic.
Pleeease, add polygon as a fundamental primitive object in OSM!
I remember someone
16 matches
Mail list logo
