Hi Mark,
Looks good. One minor note -- the notice file in the source release has not
been updated for 2011:
Copyright 2008, 2010 The Apache Software Foundation
Otherwise, everything looked good to me: source, rat, signature/checksum,
build...
Here's my +1
--kevan
On Oct 17, 2011, at 7:28 AM,
On Sep 4, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Aug 31, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'd like to call for a 2nd VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.1 .
>> The samples got LICENSE and NOTICE files and have also bee
On Aug 31, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to call for a 2nd VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.1 .
> The samples got LICENSE and NOTICE files and have also been excluded from the
> release at all.
Note that the LICENSE/NOTICE files for some of the samples are
Signature, checksum, rat, and build all look good.
However, looks like some of the samples artifacts (e.g.
openwebbeans-1.1.1/samples/standalone-sample/target/standalone-sample.jar,
openwebbeans-1.1.1/samples/jms-sample/target/jms-sample.war) do not contain
appropriate LICENSE/NOTICE files. IMO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043422#comment-13043422
]
Kevan Miller commented on OWB-579:
--
There were some comments/questions about why A
: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu
Running container tests (not standalone), I'm seeing the following failure in
Geronimo:
Expected an exception in test method
org.jboss.j
On Mar 16, 2011, at 6:39 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I'd like to fix/finish a few of my open tasks and then trigger the tasks for
> an openwebbeans-1.1.0 release.
>
> Any objections?
>
> Please give me a list of issues which should get done until then.
>
> Please note that this
On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> I think we have a few fixes to do. So my gut feeling tells me that we can
> release in somewhen between 3 weeks and 2 months from now.
>
> I like to get 1.1 as stable as 1.0 was (which was pretty solid!) ;)
Cool. I'd like to consider a milest
Great. Congrats David!
--kevan
On Nov 4, 2010, at 3:02 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> The Apache OpenWebBeans PMC is pleased to announce that David Jencks has
> accepted our invitation to join OpenWebBeans as a committer.
>
> Congratulations and welcome David!
>
> txs and LieGrue,
>
+1
Signatures/checksums, rat, build, and snooping through source -- all look good.
--kevan
On Aug 30, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.0.0-alpha-2.
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/re
Congrats Gerhard!
--kevan
On Aug 3, 2010, at 3:34 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The OpenWebBeans PMC is very proud to welcome another top notch developer as
> committer in our team!
>
> Gerhard Petracek will support us with code drops and also with his detailed
> knowledge about JSR-303
FYI
The JCDI, Bean Validation, Stax, and JAXB test harnesses have been moved to
public svn in Geronimo -- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966421&view=rev
--kevan
+1
Source, signatures/checksums, build look good.
The redundant (and different) LICENCE and LICENSE files should be cleaned up in
the source distribution. I'd use a 'LICENSE' file since that is what most/all
projects use (and it contains the 'Apache License'.
The LICENCE/NOTICE files in contai
All,
FYI. If you'd like to attend Apache Con, but are having trouble justifying the
expense -- please see below. This is a great program...
--kevan
On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:14 AM, Gav... wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> There is only ONE WEEK to go before we stop accepting applications for
> financial assista
Source distribution, signatures, checksums all look good.
As it should, the source distribution contains LICENSE/NOTICE files. They look
fine. However, the SVN tag does not --
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/build-tools/tags/checkstyle-rules-1.0.0/
IMO, it should. A bit of a grey
All,
FYI -- As hopefully our last Incubator task, I've just removed openwebbeans
from http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator
IIUC, Releases are automatically archived. Our M1,M2, and M3 releases are all
superceded by our TLP release in http://www.apache.org/dist/openwebbeans/
Any problems/questio
OpenWebBeans Community,
Reminder of the Call For Participation for ApacheCon North America
2010:https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/call_for_participation_technical_talks
Submissions are due Friday, May 28 by midnight PDT.
--kevan
On May 18, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hello Joe;
>
> Last time passed standalone and web profile but not full EE profile. I think
> that your points are some default of the current specification.
>
> To full EE profile testing, we have to integrate it with Geronimo but it
> ta
FYI. Forwarding the ApacheCon CFP from annou...@apachecon.com
--kevan
On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Sally Khudairi wrote:
> ApacheCon North America 2010
> 1-5 November 2010 -- Westin Peachtree in Atlanta
>
> Technical Tracks: Call For Participation
> All submissions must be received by Friday, 28
Apologies for the broadcast message...
In thinking about ApacheCon 2010, I began to wonder if there is interest in
creating an "Enterprise Java" track for the conference. I think there is the
potential for a lot of interesting content. Many of our projects are busy
implementing JSR specs for Ja
On Mar 8, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> I have asked this at general@
>
> http://old.nabble.com/Third-party-Maven-Repository-Usage-to27823163.html
What's the issue? There's no restriction on what repositories you can refer
to...
--kevan
On Mar 7, 2010, at 7:50 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel wrote:
> Maybe a nice addition. I'm trying to set up a reference application using
> MyFaces 2, OWB and OpenJPA 2 which I'll donate to Apache. Not sure which
> project, but I currently think MyFaces, since I'm already involved there.
>
> This should
On Mar 5, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Those files are not permanent files and they will be removed, they are just
> a simple workarounds to run TCK tests in my local. They are copied from RI
> TCK source and contains some tweak.
>
> Moreover, I did not release this module (webbeans
Congrats Ying!
--kevan
On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> All,
>
> OpenWebBeans PMC is pleased to announce that Ying Wang has accepted our
> invitation to join the
> OpenWebBeans project as a committer.
>
> Congratulations and welcome Ying!
>
> Thanks;
>
> Gurkan
>
>
>
>
On Mar 5, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Those files are not permanent files and they will be removed, they are just
> a simple workarounds to run TCK tests in my local. They are copied from RI
> TCK source and contains some tweak.
>
> Moreover, I did not release this module (webbeans
The following files don't have a license header.
!? ./webbeans-tck/jsr299-tck-impl-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-suite.xml
!?
./webbeans-tck/src/test/resources/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/tests/context/conversation/client/web.xml
!?
./webbeans-tck/src/test/resources/org/jboss/testharness/impl/packagi
On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:35 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi folks;
>
> I plan to release M4 this week. Please commit your recent changes that you
> would like to include in M4 until Friday. We will freeze code on Friday
> night and I will build a release at weekend. Probably VOTE on the release
> wi
Donald,
Many thanks for cranking out these specs!
Here's my +1
I verified source, signatures/checksum, and build. All looked good.
--kevan
On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:00 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to
> release candidate 2 of a Beta
On Jan 12, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when replying to a commit email, it uses this INVALID email address
>
> openwebbeans-...@openwebbeans.apache.org
>
> It is dev@openwebbeans.apache.org instead;
> Does one where to change that ?
Infra needs to do that. Looks
+1
--kevan
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I'd like to call a vote on using the Nexus repository infrastructure for
> deploying snapshots/releases of OpenWebBeans. Nexus makes release process a
> lot simpler.
>
> INFRA needs a positive votes by our community to ev
30 matches
Mail list logo
