[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15429250#comment-15429250
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1751:
---
Please review, [~samarthjain]. This shoul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15429242#comment-15429242
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-1751:
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the res
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-1751:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-1751_v3.patch
New patch that fixes the couple of test failures (which were
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor reassigned PHOENIX-1751:
-
Assignee: James Taylor
> Perform aggregations, sorting, etc, in the preScannerOpen inst
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-1751:
--
Summary: Perform aggregations, sorting, etc, in the preScannerOpen instead
of postScannerOpen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15429145#comment-15429145
]
James Taylor edited comment on PHOENIX-3187 at 8/20/16 1:34 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15429145#comment-15429145
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3187:
---
Can you elaborate more on why you need mu
It's TPC-DS, not -H, but this is what I was using way back when to run perf
tests over Phoenix and the query server while I was developing on it. The
first project generates, loads the data via mapreduce and the second tool
wraps up use of jmeter to run queries in parallel.
https://github.com/ndim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15429132#comment-15429132
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-930:
---
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the result
> Maybe there's such a test harness that already exists for TPC?
TPC provides tooling but it's all proprietary. The generated data can be
kept separately (Druid does it at least -
http://druid.io/blog/2014/03/17/benchmarking-druid.html
).
I'd say there would be one time setup: generation of data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15429119#comment-15429119
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-930:
---
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the result
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > I have a long interest in 'canned' loadings. Interesting ones are hard to
> > come by. If Phoenix ran any or a subset of TPCs, I'd like to try it.
>
> Likewise
>
> > But I don't want to be the first to try it. I am not a Phoenix expert.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-3148:
Attachment: PHOENIX-3148-v2.patch
Attached v2 patch which has missing files.
> Reduce siz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-3148:
Attachment: PHOENIX-3148.patch
[~jamestaylor]
Can you please review? I was not able to ru
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-930:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX-930_v5.patch
Reattaching to get test run
> duplicated columns cause query ex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-3185.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of PHOENIX-930.
> Error: ERROR 514 (42892): A duplicate col
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-930:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX-930_v4.patch
Thanks for the patches, [~yhxx511] and [~kalyanhadoop]. Please f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15428993#comment-15428993
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-808:
---
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the result
Thanks John.
How was the region server Java process' heap configured?(Mujtaba is out today,
not sure he'll listen in before Monday)
On our regular SKUs we configure the region servers with 31GB of heap (the
machines have more RAM than that), but I am not sure about which test cluster
we used fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15428949#comment-15428949
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-808:
--
+1. Looks good, [~samarthjain].
> Create sn
> I have a long interest in 'canned' loadings. Interesting ones are hard to
> come by. If Phoenix ran any or a subset of TPCs, I'd like to try it.
Likewise
> But I don't want to be the first to try it. I am not a Phoenix expert.
Same here, I'd just email dev@phoenix with a report that TPC query
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:19 PM, James Taylor
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Stack wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:54 PM, James Taylor
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The data loaded fine for us.
> >
> >
> > Mind describing what you did to get it to work and with what versions and
> > c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Samarth Jain updated PHOENIX-808:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX-808_v2_master.patch
Patch for master branch.
> Create snapshot of system tab
Sorry for the delay on this end…
Each Region Server has 24 Gigs of Ram, 12 cores plus 12 virtual cores.
Would you please provide appropriate configurations for an analytic and data
load benchmark?
I am hearing HBase 1.2 and latest Phoenix release.
If you are using open source hbase, woul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15428876#comment-15428876
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-808:
---
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Samarth Jain updated PHOENIX-808:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX-808_v2_nowhitespacediff.patch
PHOENIX-808_v2.patch
Updated pa
I think Stack it trying to help and was just asking whether Mujtaba did
something special to load the data (and perhaps how it took for us and on how
many nodes we did that).(If it loaded fine for us and there was nothing special
we had to do, I agree that there's no way (or need) to troubleshoo
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Stack wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:54 PM, James Taylor
> wrote:
>
> > The data loaded fine for us.
>
>
> Mind describing what you did to get it to work and with what versions and
> configurations and with what TPC loading and how much of the workload was
>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:54 PM, James Taylor
wrote:
> The data loaded fine for us.
Mind describing what you did to get it to work and with what versions and
configurations and with what TPC loading and how much of the workload was
supported? Was it a one-off project?
> If TPC is not represe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15428577#comment-15428577
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-808:
--
I suppose for 4.8.1, we probably shouldn't r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15428575#comment-15428575
]
Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-808:
--
Thanks for the review, [~jamestaylor]. Shoul
This is good feedback, Afshin. Thanks for letting us know. I've updated the
download page to provide a link to the new fixes/features. Would be great
if this link could be dynamic (i.e. always point to the release notes from
the last released version). Anyone know how to do this?
I've also updated
Hi Xiaopeng,
You're not the only one who's interested in phoenix-spark and dynamic
columns! I responded to a similar question on the phoenix-users group
recently:
http://search-hadoop.com/m/9UY0h2bNa0FLjndj1&subj=Re+Phoenix+spark+and+dynamic+columns
I'm not aware of any ongoing work for this feat
Hi Xiaopeng,
Thanks for the message. Using the dev list for this type of discussion
is great.
I am not familiar with the implementation (and the "gotchas" that might
exist in this improvement), but I would encourage you to try to reach
out on that JIRA issue you mentioned. Maybe Josh M or Ra
(-cc other lists)
Hi Afshin,
The release notes you referenced are more meant to alert users about any
issues in the new release that you may run into over previous releases.
"Release notes provide details on issues and their fixes which may have
an impact on prior Phoenix behavior"
- Josh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15428320#comment-15428320
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2161:
---
You'd set phoenix.query.timeoutMs to caus
36 matches
Mail list logo
