Betreff: Re: S7 types supporting Subscriptions
Hello,
I think that makes the API more complex than necessary.
We should keep it as simple as possible.
I think that for the driver there are already some fields that are
MetaData, so we should document and not extend the API.
As you don't poin
ion when buiding a request might be a better
> option.
> So you use the isXYZSupported functions for general functionality support
> and catch exceptions later.
>
> Chris
>
> Von: Łukasz Dywicki
> Datum: Freitag, 15. März 2024 um 10:48
> An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
>
@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: Re: S7 types supporting Subscriptions
Thinking of it, maybe it would be better to extend signature of
subscription inquiry to be isSubscriptionSupported(PlcTag) ?
My motivation for this is rather basic - the BACnet stuff which is on
the way will have per-participant subscriptions
Thinking of it, maybe it would be better to extend signature of
subscription inquiry to be isSubscriptionSupported(PlcTag) ?
My motivation for this is rather basic - the BACnet stuff which is on
the way will have per-participant subscriptions. Profinet (I suppose) is
same for cyclic/acyclic subs
Changing the title ….
So, I just updated the S7 driver to no longer simply report true on
“isSubscriptionSupported()” and it now only reports “true”, if it’s a S7-300 or
S7-400.
If there is more, that needs to be enabled in order to support subscriptions on
such a device, it would be cool, if w
