Re: svn commit: r1918174 - /poi/site/src/documentation/release-guide.txt

Wow. That’s been out of date for a long time. > On Jun 5, 2024, at 9:10 AM, fannin...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: fanningpj > Date: Wed Jun 5 16:10:19 2024 > New Revision: 1918174 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1918174&view=rev > Log: > update release doc > > Modified: >poi/si

Re: New Release to get rid of CVE

Hi Stephan, Two answers. 1) Please list the CVEs that would be fixed. It’s quite possible they have no impact on POI or XMLBeans. 2) Please consider submitting a PR to make the fix. We can always use more contributors and everyone here is a volunteer. Best, Dave > On May 15, 2024, at 2:23 AM

Re: Java 11 for POI 5?

These are great points. > On Feb 21, 2024, at 11:27 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Usually when projects dump Java 8 support, they is a strong reason. I don't > see any here. > * I am not aware of any dependency that we rely on that has fixes that we > can't uptake if we stick to Java 8 - ie the pr

Re: Java 11 for POI 5?

gt; AFAIK XMLBeans is now maintained by the POI project itself, so it should not > be problematic. > > >> Am 04.02.2024 um 20:59 schrieb Dave Fisher : >> >> What version of Java is the minimum for XMLBeans? We should not forget >> XMLBeans in this discussion. &

Re: Java 11 for POI 5?

What version of Java is the minimum for XMLBeans? We should not forget XMLBeans in this discussion. Best, Dave > On Feb 3, 2024, at 5:54 PM, Axel Howind wrote: > > No one forces users of POI to update to the latest version. Going to 11 in > POI 6 doesn't mean we > have to stop providing bug f

Re: POI PMC roll call

Hi PJ, I still monitor the project, and would, as over a decade ago be a third +1, if needed. Thank you for your leadership. More inline. > On Mar 3, 2023, at 6:26 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Apologies if anyone thinks I'm going in the wrong direction here. The TLDR > is: I

Re: Migrate from Bugzilla to GitHub Issues

ASF projects must store source and source releases on ASF controlled properties. A significant amount of work has been done in the last decade to connect Gitbox with GitHub. If anyone personally has trouble with Microsoft’s owning GitHub they can use the gitbox mirrors. 14 years ago we had sig

Fwd: Error when processing doap file http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlbeans/trunk/xkit/doap_XMLBeans.rdf:

FYI Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Projects > Date: June 9, 2022 at 7:03:58 PM PDT > To: Site Development > Subject: Error when processing doap file > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlbeans/trunk/xkit/doap_XMLBeans.rdf: > Reply-To: site-...@apache.org > > URL: http:/

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 5.2.0 release (RC2)

Wow 6 PMC members voted when was the last time that happened? Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 14, 2022, at 3:01 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > The vote carries with 6 +1s from PMC members. I will proceed with the > release and announcement. > > Thanks everyone for verifying the release. > > > >

Log4j 2.16.0 a more complete fix to Log4Shell

https://lists.apache.org/thread/d6v4r6nosxysyq9rvnr779336yf0woz4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (XMLBEANS-571) Excel file read failure using xmlbeans 3.0.0 whereas it works on xmlbeans 2.6.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17420864#comment-17420864 ] Dave Fisher commented on XMLBEANS-571: -- I think you need to talk to your man

Re: svn commit: r1893606 - /poi/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/components/index.xml

> On Sep 24, 2021, at 11:10 AM, fannin...@apache.org wrote: > > It may be possible to use newer XMLBeans jars but there no guarantees, > especially of the XMLBeans version It may be possible to use newer XMLBeans jars but there are no guarantees, especially if the XMLBeans version

Re: Forrest replacement

template based on template-site… - FAQ page - manual conversion will be done. It’s a one off. > On Jul 13, 2021, at 10:56 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > I’ve had two git repositories created: > > poi-site and poi-xmlbeans-site > >> On Jul 11, 2021, at

Re: Forrest replacement

Hi - I’ve had two git repositories created: poi-site and poi-xmlbeans-site > On Jul 11, 2021, at 1:31 PM, Andreas Beeker wrote: > > Hi Dave, > >> A simpler way of stating (b) is that we separate the site from the release >> process. This makes sense to me since since there are portions of th

Re: Forrest replacement

Hi Andi, > On Jul 9, 2021, at 4:13 PM, Andreas Beeker wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > thanks for the feedback. > > Regarding the different site branch - POI has the site in the bin/src > archives, XmlBeans doesn't. > > Although I'm not a fan of the bin/src archives, as I usually just use a > packag

Re: Forrest replacement

Hi - I have experience with both jBake and Pelican ASF. (This is the replacement for the Apache CMS. I contributed heavily to it.) jBaked sites are incubator.apache.org (including several Anakia legacy parts. It’s complicated.) and openoffice.org

Re: Returned post for annou...@apache.org

Hi - The Keys file is referenced in two places. Once in the verification section where it has the older link. The second time under archives where it points to the archive. That can be fixed since the dist/downloads location is automatically copied to archives.a.o. Regarding the nightly build S

Re: License file

> On Jan 12, 2021, at 10:42 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2021, Andreas Beeker wrote: >> do we really need that long LICENSE file? >> >> Junit / Jacoco and few others aren't necessary to run POI and only used to >> build it. >> >> Do utility libraries need to be included in the o

Re: Logging

FYI - POLogger was part of the initial commit of POI to the Apache Jakarta project on Jan. 31, 2002. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=352063 History from svn can be found here: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/t

Fwd: Working around a JRE bug

From the Tomcat Dev List ... Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Mark Thomas > Date: November 5, 2020 at 4:57:58 AM PST > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Working around a JRE bug > Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" > > All, > > The summary: > > - The JVM spec state

[DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.1.2 release (RC2)

Hi - What resources would be needed to replace Dominick’s equipment? Depending on the resources it might be possible to have ASF infrastructure provision a VM to be managed by POI PMC. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 5, 2020, at 3:38 PM, Andreas Beeker wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > do

Re: Remove bloated examples?

That stuff was really useful when we had no documentation well over a decade ago. I wonder if Nick or Yegor have an opinion about this. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 8, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Alain Béarez wrote: > > +1 for removal of examples using outdated technologies > > ⁣Obter

2020 ASF Community Survey

Hello everyone, If you have an apache.org email, you should have received an email with an invitation to take the 2020 ASF Community Survey. Please take 15 minutes to complete it. If you do not have an apache.org email address or you didn’t receive a li

Re: Concatenating, Indexing, and Copying a document to the end of another

Hi - Assuming the OP has the rights this could be refactored into an example. I don’t think we require a full set of unit tests for an example. Regards, Dave > On Oct 24, 2019, at 6:27 AM, Mark Murphy wrote: > > In addition, if you were paid to develop the software, it likely belongs to > the

Re: Git question for the gurus

Hi Mark, I find SVN better for me too. It has advantages, but branches are expensive. Your repository is monolithic and you only need the parts you are interested in. Git is distributed and branches are cheap, but it makes procedures more complex and less intuitive. I often feel like I’m going

Re: EXT MSG Re: Error while building POI project

OOXML *is* part of POI. You will need XMLBeans if you wish to compile these. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 25, 2019, at 6:29 PM, Gauntt, David wrote: > > I have updated Eclipse to version 2019-03, and pulled the latest version of > Poi trunk from the Git mirror. Eclipse now builds POI without

Re: Returned post for annou...@apache.org

You don’t have links to the download or download page. Take a look at previous announcements. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 4, 2019, at 6:09 PM, Greg Woolsey wrote: > > Anyone see anything wrong with my XMLBeans announcement below, before I try > again? Looks right to me. My Apache account is

Re: XMLBeans 3.1.0 candidate build

Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 24, 2019, at 3:31 PM, Andreas Beeker wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > First of all, thank you Greg for taking the release manager role - I know > it's time consuming especially in the beginning. > > It's ok, but not nice to have the bin directory in the src dist duplica

Re: 4.0.1 build fails - no RELEASE-NOTES.txt in git

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 26, 2018, at 4:17 PM, Filipp Gunbin wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > >> On 26/12/2018 21:31 +0100, Andreas Beeker wrote: >> >> Hi Filipp, >> >> the documentation directory is a svn external, which is apparently not >> mirrored to github. In case you would like veri

Re: Dave's POI talk at COSCON

Yes. You found it! Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 6, 2018, at 12:29 PM, Tim Allison wrote: > > W00t!!! > > Here's Dave's talk on POI at COSCON in Shenzhen, China on October 20, 2018: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7_Y3zNb_-w > > ---

Re: Here are my slides (if attachments are not stripped)

Thanks! On 2018/10/19 12:23:18, "pj.fanning" wrote: > LGTM. > > 2 minor typos: > conjuction > uneccessary > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Here are my slides (if attachments are not stripped)

Hi - Any typos, tiny enhancements or other comments? Regards, Dave Dave-poi.pptx Description: MS-Powerpoint 2007 presentation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@

List of Slides for my China talk this coming weekend

Hi - I’ve come with the plan for my POI talk next weekend. I need to finalize my slides tomorrow so that some Chinese translation can be done. I have some questions that I’ll mark as “—>”. If you can answer you’ll save me some research. I plan to tell the story of POI, including Tika interacti

Re: EMF corpus

I’m following this as part of my talk at COSCON which I plan to include common crawler. Who is in charge of where the crawler is pointed and how would one ask for additional URLs? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 8, 2018, at 10:31 PM, Dominik Stadler wrote: > > Hi Andi, > > I hav

Re: Speaking on POI at China Open Source Conference in October

Hi Nick, Sit at BarCamp 2 Monday morning or do a BOF later? Would someone point me to the Common crawler information. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 17, 2018, at 8:07 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Sep 2018, Dave Fisher wrote: >> I’ll be at Apachecon Mon

Re: Speaking on POI at China Open Source Conference in October

ession tests... More input on test files > for the corpus would be useful. Complete understand if this is off topic. > Thank you! > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:27 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi Team, >> >> I’ve been invited to speak at the COSCON in Shenzhen,

Speaking on POI at China Open Source Conference in October

Hi Team, I’ve been invited to speak at the COSCON in Shenzhen, China on October 20-21. I’ll have two talks. One is about the Incubator, but one was my choice and I chose POI due to a few interesting things happening here plus our long history as a small project that show some important points a

Re: [VOTE] new POI logo

Hi - While I like V2, none of the docs is xlsx Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 7, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Andreas Beeker wrote: > > Hi *, > > Daniel (humbedooh) created a new logo for us and I don't want this issue left > undecided/unanswered. > > So please vote for the logos and its

Re: Provide alpha releases via Apache repo

Hi - Release Policy is such that publishing a snapshot to a public, open repository is not allowed. See http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-definition If we want to produce Alpha and Beta then we will need

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.0 release (RC1)

+1 (binding) Thanks! > On Aug 31, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Andreas Beeker wrote: > > Hi, > > I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 4.0.0 (RC1). > > The most notable changes in this release are: > > - Removed support for Java 6 and 7 making Java 8 the minimum version supported > - Un

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.0 release (RC1)

eps described in the release > guide, I've removed the MD5/SHA1 hashes and generated the SHA256/512 hashes > manually and hopefully fixed the build for the next release. > > Best wishes, > Andi > > >> On 9/1/18 11:54 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Hi - >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.0 release (RC1)

Hi - I have a few questions which are minor. (1) NOTICE has: This product contains the Piccolo XML Parser for Java (http://piccolo.sourceforge.net/). Copyright 2002 Yuval Oren. Was this eliminated? (2) In the maven ooxml-1.4 jars the LICENSE and NOTICE are missing from M

XMLBeans Project Page / DOAP

Hi Team, Take a look at the xmlbeans project page here: https://projects.apache.org/project.html?poi-xmlbeans I can see that there is some good information like the new release! However there is also some stuff that is out of date / missi

Re: Copying chart

Hi - You should create a Bugzilla and attach your patch. Regards, Dave > On Aug 23, 2018, at 2:29 PM, monnomiznog...@gmail.com wrote: > > Guys, > > You cannot ask even from advanced developers to create a chart from scratch > with java code or any other code type. > > Copying a chart from an

Re: Vote on XMLBeans 2.7.0-rc1 release

Henning wants us to use the poi areas on dist.apache.org otherwise he would have to make special changes one off changes. We should have an XMLBeans sub directory. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 10, 2018, at 11:41 AM, Andreas Beeker wrote: > >> On 6/10/18 8:21 PM, pj.fanning wrot

[VOTE][RESULTS] Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

Hi - There were 6 +1 votes to take on XMLBeans as a subproject. Alain FAGOT BEAREZ Javen O’Neal Dominik Stadler Andreas Beeker Greg Woolsey Mark Murphy Regards, Dave > On Apr 2, 2018, at 10:44 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > >> On Apr 2, 2018, at 10:23 AM, Dave Fisher &

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

> On Apr 2, 2018, at 10:23 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > We will need to make INFRA JIRA tickets with reference to the VOTE part of > this thread. > > (1) Put XMLBeans svn repos under POI LDAP. INFRA-16278 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

then going through a release. Regards, Dave > On Apr 2, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Mark Murphy wrote: > > So where are we on this? > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> Let’s get back on track. >> >> We want to rel

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

Hi - Let’s get back on track. We want to release XMLBeans 2.7.0 with the org.apache.xmlbeans namespace for the benefit of all of the users who are dependent on it. If POI does not want to do this then XMLBeans will need to go to the Incubator. Should we VOTE? If yes then we can ask Infra to o

NABBLE Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

My ISP suppresses Nabble emails. They are bounced - something to do with DKIM. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 6, 2018, at 8:47 AM, Mark Murphy wrote: > > I have a question. If we bring it into POI as a sub-project, do we have to > change its namespace? If it were added to Commons, would it have t

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 6, 2018, at 8:47 AM, Mark Murphy wrote: > > I have a question. If we bring it into POI as a sub-project, do we have to > change its namespace? If it were added to Commons, would it have to change > its namespace? In POI we would do as we wish. We would keep it as

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

, Dave > On Mar 2, 2018, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > I declared Lazy Consensus on Board@ for POI to take the XMLBeans product. So > far we have two positive responses. > > Do we have LAZY CONSENSUS? > > FYI - I did a full search of lists.apach

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

> > That will make things a lot easier. Thanks Dave. > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> Given the Attic position and the mention of Royale. I will just take this >> to the Board. >> >> They could take a res

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

Hi - Given the Attic position and the mention of Royale. I will just take this to the Board. They could take a resolution moving directly to POI. I will ask for this first. Regards, Dave > On Mar 2, 2018, at 11:35 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > As both an IPMC member a

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

Hi - As both an IPMC member and as a POI PMC member I would prefer that we direct to POI. I think we (POI) need to take over the XMLBeans Product. Regards, Dave > On Mar 2, 2018, at 11:32 AM, Mark Murphy wrote: > > So Oracle is removing JAXB from Java SE, Depricated in v9, to be removed in >

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

You might point out how widely used POI is include Tika and Solr as consumers of POI/XMLBeans. Also taking it out of the Attic was previously suggested by others... Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 28, 2018, at 12:41 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > >> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, pj.fanning wrote:

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** RE: adding dependencies on h2 and mockito

Hi - We need to be really careful not to make OOXML deployments larger. Why is H2, a database engine, being considered? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 26, 2018, at 11:55 AM, Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ wrote: > > You might have heard of Hypersonic SQL, some 10 years ago. H2 is the second

Re: XMLBeans in 4.0.0 release

Hi - I think that releasing a package with right XMLbean path in Maven Central might be best for our users. Finding that they have issues with old XMLbeans might be subtly difficult. I could be wrong. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 9, 2018, at 12:28 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > >> On

Re: [DISCUSS] Getting a fixed version of XMLBeans

Hi Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 9, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Dominik Stadler wrote: > > Hi, > > the initial discussion showed a few possible routes. I would like to > discuss the options a bit more, probably followed by a vote to see which > option has the majority. > > I currently see the following

Re: Moving to Git

Hi - Infrastructure is just now getting something called GitBox going which should help with integration of Apache LDAP etcetera. They are also working on a JIRA service ticket improvement. Javen it might be good if you reached out to Infrastructure and a clear explanation of how to properly c

Re: POI @ ApacheCon

I arrive as well Sent from my iPhone > On May 15, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote: > > I'll arrive tonight. See you there! > > -Original Message- > From: David North [mailto:dno...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 10:20 AM > To: POI Developers List > Subject: POI

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache POI 3.14-final release (RC1)

I agree with Nick. Changes to the OOXML schema jars are a significant change. Considering why the lite jar was created a metric on the size change of that jar would be helpful as well. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 6, 2016, at 3:47 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016,

Re: ODF Explorer

Hi Ian, Your tool and the compliments it is receiving are interesting. Including poi and Yegor. What do people think? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 29, 2015, at 8:53 PM, Ian C wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Peter Kelly wrote: >> Ok I just figur

Fwd: A nice OOXML reference site

FYI. Corinthia is an Incubator podling that may be of interest to the POI community. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Peter Kelly > Date: August 13, 2015 at 1:11:35 PM PDT > To: d...@corinthia.incubator.apache.org > Subject: A nice OOXML reference site > Repl

Re: Another beta?

Hi NIck, I think you hang out on the Tika dev list. Do you know when the next major release of Tika is coming? When do we need to release to be included? If I knew that it might help get some daylight cycles on POI. Regards, Dave On Jan 14, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > Hi All > > It

Re: [Vote] Andreas Beeker as new POI Committer + PMC member

+1 from me. Regards, Dave On Dec 18, 2013, at 10:55 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > Hi All > > Andreas Beeker has contributed a number of > excellent patches and investigations [1]. > His code seems to follow our standards and I think he'd be a great addition > to the POI committers list. > > pleas

Re: Please remove my file from your svn

Hi Chris, I am on both the Apache POI and the Apache OpenOffice PMC. Action will be taken. As a producer of PPT and PPTX files along with other Office documents we have always done our best to try to consume documents created by any producer including OpenOffice.org. I wonder if a PPT produced

Re: Excel Function COUNTIFS available in poi ?

Hi Detlef, Thanks! Please create a bugzilla issue with [PATCH] in the subject at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=POI Regards, Dave On Dec 9, 2013, at 6:11 AM, Detlef Brendle wrote: > Hi Poi Team, > > I have come up with a proposal for an implementation for this functi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache POI 3.10 Beta 2 released

OLE Embedding looks like a hot patch to check out. It is certainly very useful. Regards, Dave On Sep 22, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Dominik Stadler wrote: >> what are the next steps on POI? Do we stabilize a bit more and release 3.10 >> before doing more risky st

Re: [Vote] Tim Allison as new POI Committer + PMC member

+1 (binding) On Jul 3, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Joe Wicentowski wrote: >> I'm +1! > > +1! > > Thanks Tim! > > Joe > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Cedric Walter as committer

+1 (binding) On Jun 17, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > Hi All > > Cedric Walter has submitted a bunch of > outstanding patches in the area of formula support [1]. His > contributions seem to be up to our standards, and I had no > problems collaborating with him and reviewing his code.

Re: [Vote] Dominik Stadler as new POI Committer + PMC member

+1 (binding) On May 29, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > Hi All > > Dominik Stadler has been doing some great work > recently[1] on submitting new patches, and helping clarify + test existing > bugs. Based on all that, I think he'd be a great addition to the POI > committers list > > P

Re: Error code told me to email the developers.

The developers list. Dev@poi.apache.org I've done so. Thanks for your report. Sent from my iPhone On May 21, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Mathew Reny wrote: > I don't need any help, errors happen, however this error explicitly told me > to email you guys. Below are the stack traces and source code that

Re: poi pull request: HSSFWorkbook.getAllEmbeddedObjects wasn't getting all emb...

Poi is an svn project as you should already know. Sent from my iPhone On May 20, 2013, at 7:36 PM, trejkaz wrote: > GitHub user trejkaz opened a pull request: > >https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/2 > >HSSFWorkbook.getAllEmbeddedObjects wasn't getting all embedded objects > >HSSF

Re: Contributing to XSLF Code

On May 17, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Fri, 17 May 2013, Eliot Kimber wrote: >> I am trying to use the XSLF code to implement manipulation and generation of >> PPTX presentations. I see that there are still some missing features and >> bugs. I am more than happy to contribute to th

Re: POI Workbook adapter for ODFToolkit

On Feb 23, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Florian Hopf wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to let you know that I started work on a POI workbook adapter > for the ODFToolkit. The goal is to make the POI Workbook functionality > available for ODS documents so users can use the familiar POI API to read and > mod

Re: How to change PNG DPI

Give it a try. You will use more memory. Regards, Dave On Dec 27, 2012, at 4:07 AM, vegaecm wrote: > Hi, > > Our team use Apache POI to render PowerPoint documents (ppt and pptx) to > PNG. > Thank you for your efforts for this project, it is really great product! > > Could you please give us a

Re: Fixing our website to still work in 2013

POI and CMS, but you know how busy I have been. Regards, Dave > > Yegor > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> On Dec 17, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: >> >>>> I'd suggest not under trunk, but alongside >>&

Re: Fixing our website to still work in 2013

On Dec 17, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: >> I'd suggest not under trunk, but alongside > > OK, it will be https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/site. Make it https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/site/content/. and we will be more ready to switch to the CMS. > I will try to find time t

Re: [VOTE] Release POI 3.9

Thanks. I've had no time until tonight - I was traveling all last week. I'm glad to see that the VOTE now has 3 +1. On Dec 4, 2012, at 2:01 AM, Maxim Valyanskiy wrote: > +1 > > 26.11.2012 18:43, Yegor Kozlov пишет: >> Hi All, >> >> A candidate for the POI-3.9 FINAL release is available at: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release POI 3.9

Forgive my previous email from a bad iPhone action. I won't be able to review until Tuesday or Wednesday. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Dec 2, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Evgeniy Berlog wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> A candidate for t

Re: [VOTE] Release POI 3.9

I won Sent from my iPhone On Dec 2, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Evgeniy Berlog wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> A candidate for the POI-3.9 FINAL release is available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/ >> >> The release cand

Re: Problem extracting date from Outlook 2007 .msg file

Hi Joe, Are you looking to pay this person to help or are you looking for someone with the same "itch" as you? (Not that I am volunteering either way - it's not my area.) Regards, Dave On Aug 21, 2012, at 2:33 PM, Joe Wicentowski wrote: > Hi all, > > I hadn't heard from anyone about the ques

Re: [VOTE] Evgeniy Berlog as committer

I am +1. (but we need to do this in private.) On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > Hi All, > > Our GSoC student, Evgeniy Berlog is doing a great job improving > drawing support in HSSF. > His contributions seem to be up to our standards and I'm happy to > collaborate with him. > >

Re: [VOTE] Evgeniy Berlog as committer

Forgive me. I've been working on project's in the Incubator where votes in public would be sure to have many ballots. POI has been holding Committer votes in public for 5 years. They are just infrequent. Refgards, Dave On Jun 4, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Pleas

Re: [VOTE] Evgeniy Berlog as committer

Please ignore this thread. Committer votes are held on private lists in Apache projects. Regards, Dave On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Sergey Vladimirov wrote: > +1 > > -- > Sergey Vladimirov > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Our GSoC student, Evgeniy

Re: [VOTE] Release POI 3.8 FINAL

+1. Go POI 3.8! Thank you Yegor! On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:17 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > Hi All, > > A candidate for the POI-3.8 FINAL release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/ > > The release candidate was built from the REL_3_8_FINAL tag and > includes all changes

Re: [VOTE] Release POI 3.8 FINAL

Hi - If no one else votes, I'll do the checks and vote late today. Regards, Dave On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:17 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > Hi All, > > A candidate for the POI-3.8 FINAL release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/ > > The release candidate was built from

Re: contributing code to POI

On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Niklas Rehfeld wrote: > Thanks for clearing that up! I always get a bit confused with copyright stuff. > >> You should use the same standard Apache License header that's used in the >> POI source code. I can't spot anything about "the POI license" anywhere, can >> yo

Re: contributing code to POI

All contributions to a project at The Apache Software Foundation are made under the Apache License 2.0. [1] You are free to offer your own project under whatever license you wish, but you should offer your contribution to the project under the AL2. Here is a FAQ [2] If your contribution is larg

Re: [VOTE] Release POI 3.8 beta5

+1. I have some reservations for a FINAL release. (1) When I check the signature of the tar.gz packages. I have to gunzip and change the name of the gpg. (2) Sometimes the tests fail with: [junit] Running org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.TestBugs [junit] Invalid memory access of location

Re: Beta 5?

On Nov 30, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > >> Two weeks back, I posted my plan to release 3.8-final in December >> 2011, but now I realize that we are not yet ready and another beta >> would be more ap

Re: Beta 5?

On Nov 29, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > Two weeks back, I posted my plan to release 3.8-final in December > 2011, but now I realize that we are not yet ready and another beta > would be more appropriate. > Personally, I think we are ready for the final release in terms of new > featur

Re: release 3.8-final in late Dec

+1 Sent from my iPhone On Nov 15, 2011, at 6:37 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > Hi All! > > What do people think if we release 3.8-final by the end of this year? > My plan is to cut the release around Dec 15, then give 7-10 days for > the vote and be on the mirrors by New Year. > > I'm +1 to releas

Re: Is development in poi completely stalled ??

Sanmoy, Let me add to what Nick wrote. On Sep 19, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Sanmoy Ray wrote: >> Do not get me wrong in this, but poi development is very slow in compare to >> other popular apache projects > > We're all volunteers here > >> Development in XSLF

Re: when is 3.8 stable version planned to be released

On Sep 13, 2011, at 6:22 AM, nmsrinivas wrote: > hi , > Please help me any one > > 1)poi XSSF doesn't read the blank cell(empty) with Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK ? > how to read ? > http://poi.apache.org/apidocs/org/apache/poi/ss/usermodel/Workbook.html#setMissingCellPolicy(org.apache.poi.ss.usermode

Re: [VOTE] Release POI 3.8 beta4 - Take 2

OK - I am +1 Regards, Dave On Aug 23, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > Hi All, > > Please test-drive the release candidate for POI 3.8 beta4 (take 2). > Compared to the first version, two release blockers have been found and fixed: > > (1) https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

Re: [VOTE] Release POI 3.8 beta4 - Take 2

On Aug 25, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Yegor Kozlov wrote: >> Dave and Nick, >> Is it really a blocker? Can I have provisional +1 from you, providing >> that the the problem fixed in trunk ASAP? > > It's certainly a blocker on a final release. On a test file, on a

Re: [VOTE] Release POI 3.8 beta4 - Take 2

On Aug 25, 2011, at 1:38 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Do you have a project that we could copy. If so, I'll throw it into the poi >> build.xml and see what's up. > > I can do one better, it's already in our build.xml :

Re: [VOTE] Release POI 3.8 beta4 - Take 2

On Aug 24, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Dave Fisher wrote: >> I think we have been accepting the dummy.txt, *.pen and *.dtd as exceptions. > > The dummy ones should be being excluded already, though possibly they're not > due to a recent

  1   2   >