Re: Upgrade to 2.11.2 fail

2023-07-31 Thread Niclas Hedhman
ges to broker.conf already. Cheers Niclas On 2023-07-31 09:45, guo jiwei wrote: Hi Niclas `flow_or_qps_equally_divide` was introduced in 3.0, Normally this value should not be included in your broker.conf. Please check. Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 6:34 PM Niclas Hedh

Re: Upgrade to 2.11.2 fail

2023-07-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
starts. I also suggest that the Exception puts the brokerConfig value in the message as well as the supported algos (Line 179 in PulsarBrokerStarter.java), so there is a chance to figure out what is going wrong here. // Niclas On 2023-07-28 11:59, Niclas Hedhman wrote: Hi, I am trying

Upgrade to 2.11.2 fail

2023-07-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Hi, I am trying to upgrade from 2.10.3 to 2.11.2 and I am getting the following right at start-up and I don't understand the message at all. 2023-07-28T09:46:07,973Z [jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader@5ffd2b27] error Uncaught exception in thread main: The given supported

Fwd: Pulsar Functions Lifecycle?

2023-04-27 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Message Subject: Pulsar Functions Lifecycle? Date: 2023-04-26 12:55 From: Niclas Hedhman To: us...@pulsar.apache.org Reply-To: us...@pulsar.apache.org Hi, I have been using Pulsar quite successfully for a bit more than a year now, and quite happy with it. Now, I would like

Re: Please stop cherry-picking (breaking) changes to the released branches

2023-02-27 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Enrico, I find it interesting that the main reaction is to focus on the symptom, rather than the disease. From my experience, the open source project should drop the support of multiple release branches (especially since they are claimed to be backward compatible), only have one released

Re: Please stop cherry-picking (breaking) changes to the released branches

2023-02-27 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Linus Thorvalds has spoken about this more than once, and his position is that the ultimate failure of a project is to worsen the user experience, and changing behavior is "worse experience". He claim to go as far as revert bug fixes if there are people depending on the buggy behavior and

Re: [VOTE] PIP-208: HTTP Sink

2022-10-18 Thread Niclas Hedhman
+1 non-binding Niclas On 2022-10-13 19:34, Christophe Bornet wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to start a vote for the PIP-208: HTTP Sink ( https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/17719) The discussion can be found here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/9brckr22l5s3y072fs946vxhxnzz5km7 Best

Broken link on Docker Hub

2022-09-30 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On the page https://hub.docker.com/r/apachepulsar/pulsar, there is a link to "run Pulsar in standalone mode", https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/standalone-docker/ which directs to a 404. I think the other links are working correctly. Niclas Hedhman

Re: Major problem

2022-06-15 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On 2022-06-15 20:03, Matteo Merli wrote: Hi Niclas, can you provide the output of `pulsar-admin topics stats $TOPIC` Answer on users@ brought me back to a stable situation and issue is resolved. Thanks Niclas

Major problem

2022-06-15 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Hi, (perhaps this is a dev@ issue more than a users@ issue) I have had a Pulsar system running for ~5 months and have had no problems. Today I updated my application that uses Pulsar, and everything stopped working. I naturally assumed that the problem was in my application. And after a lot

Re: [Discussion] Do you like the blue background of the New Pulsar Website?

2022-05-13 Thread Niclas Hedhman
I am someone who generally has problem with the lack of contrast on many websites. pulsar.apache.org is NOT one of them. As long as the text is kept (near) black, I am fine. Of course; Only one datapoint, and in the positive, so not too much weight to it. Should hear from those who has

Re: Enable GitHub Discussions?

2022-04-25 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On 2022-04-25 12:34, Yu wrote: Another important part of The Apache Way is to make decisions by reaching consensus (and avoiding votes). But the Apache Website says "one of the fundamental aspects of accomplishing things within the Apache framework is doing so by consensus, we need a way to

Re: Architecture of function authorization for process mode

2022-01-25 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On 2022-01-25 08:57, Matteo Merli wrote: The only recommended way to run a multi-tenant Pulsar functions clusters is to run it with Kubernetes runtime. In thread or process runtime, there is no reliable way to restrict the access to the credentials of each function instance (since it needs to

Re: Architecture of function authorization for process mode

2022-01-24 Thread Niclas Hedhman
This sounds quite important, and I would like to hear from the devs if this is correct or something is misunderstood. I am about to recommend (or not) a critical multi-tenant system, so would like to get the full picture. Thanks Niclas On 2022-01-21 15:51, Devin Bost wrote: I discovered

Re: [VOTE] PIP-86: Pulsar Functions: Preload and release external resources

2022-01-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
+1, non-binding On 2022-01-21 21:07, Neng Lu wrote: Hi All, I would like to start a VOTE on the PIP 86. (If it's already been voted, please let me know.) The issue for PIP 86 is here: