Re: Slider Component

Hi, > I've tried the slider with Safari, Chrome, and Firefox. I guess I am not > understanding the problem. I describe the issue and how to reproduce here [1] and have provided a fix for it here [2] it would be nice if someone reviewed it as this has been open for a month. The fix just commit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

+0 (Binding) Maven Build compiler, typedefs and asjs - Pass. Ant Build - Pass Maven Artifacts and Ant binary IDE package checked with three examples which are not part of the asjs respository. I'm giving +0 because I couldn't build Maven binary distribution. It is because poms from that folder w

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Hi Olaf, It is definitely not your fault. It is because HelloWorld pom.xml is not prepared to build without parent etc. I have tweaked pom a big. Please download this one and try to build [1]. You may get question about accepting license for playerglobal, just type "y". [1] https://paste.apache.o

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:14 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote: > The ApproveRoyale script fails for me [1][2]. > I've just installed ant on my Windows 10 machine and followed the > instructions. > > I have to admit that I have no experience with ant... > Does it mean that the script is not "well-formed"? >

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

The ApproveRoyale script fails for me [1][2]. I've just installed ant on my Windows 10 machine and followed the instructions. I have to admit that I have no experience with ant... Does it mean that the script is not "well-formed"? Or does it mean that the error "The release version is not set" occ

Re: Slider Component

Hi I've pushed a change to the slider mouse controllers that should make it better. Now clicking on the thumb will not move it. If you drag the thumb it should reposition centered under the mouse cursor. But doing it quickly (ie, normally) it tracks a little off. I think that's because the events

Re: [website] Things needed to release website ASAP

Hi, I think we wait several days and since nobody has post more things, I think I can proceed to upload the site to "asf-site" branch in "royale-website" repo. I'll be doing this in the next few hours ok? thanks Carlos 2018-01-07 11:16 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi Olaf and Piotr, > > for m

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

I hopefully did all the things as you've described it. But unfortunately, it fails for me. Hope this helps [1]. Thanks, Olaf [1] $ mvn clean install -s settings-template.xml [INFO] Scanning for projects... Downloading from apache-staging: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

I found that setting the environment variable PLAYERGLOBAL_VERSION seems to allow the build to work with a playerglobal other than 11.1. I updated the README for the following release. -Alex On 1/9/18, 11:49 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I made some changes to the develop branch and tests seem to b

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

I made some changes to the develop branch and tests seem to be passing on Windows in the Maven CI -Alex On 1/9/18, 8:37 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >FWIW, the tests passed for me on Windows on the first try, but the log >shows I got lucky and the js.swc was written out after the second test >starte

Re: Slider Component

Thanks for the video! That was great. I do see what you are describing. I'll look into it. —peter On 1/9/18, 1:49 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Hi Peter, > >I think the best way to show you the problems is with a video. I uploaded >a >hidden video here: >https

Re: Slider Component

Hi Peter, I think the best way to show you the problems is with a video. I uploaded a hidden video here: https://youtu.be/m1SnCyHeUzc Please, let me know when you see it, I could remove it in some days or if you want left it more time I'm on Mac/Safari, I think here you can see some problems here

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

+1 Binding Used Approval script (used playerglobal 11.1 swc) I didn't see any problems that would withhold this from release. ‹peter On 1/9/18, 11:25 AM, "yishayw" wrote: >+1 >Package >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apac >he.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyal

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

The whole point of the "release philosophy" thread is that we are trying to re-program everyone's mentality towards shipping instead of not shipping. I agree we need to make the scripts work for other player versions, but again, that can be done in the next release. If you find a problem, don't j

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Yes, I can get 11.1, but 27.0 is in the apache-royale-0.9.0 IDE-compatable directory that got built with the installer script. It must have downloaded the latest playerglobal.swc at that time. Seems natural to use that rather than 11.1. ‹peter On 1/9/18, 11:30 AM, "yishayw" wrote: >Peter, if y

Re: Compiling Royale Libraries with Flash Builder (SWF)

Interesting. Hadn't notice that. Feel free to add them. -Alex On 1/9/18, 3:46 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: > >Is there any reason why there are no IDE files (.project, >.actionSciriptProperties, etc.) in Basic in the git repo? They do exist >for other projects (e.g. Core). I think some of my pro

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

FWIW, the tests passed for me on Windows on the first try, but the log shows I got lucky and the js.swc was written out after the second test started but must have just been in time for the compiler to see it. I will spend some time today to put in a better solution in the develop branch before tu

Re: Slider Component

I've tried the slider with Safari, Chrome, and Firefox. I guess I am not understanding the problem. When I move the mouse into the slider thumb control, press the mouse button down and drag, the thumb follows the mouse immediately. It may snap to step positions along the track if the range isn't ve

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Peter, if you look in royale-asjs README isn't the following set of instructions consistent with your results? > ## Additional Prerequisites For SWF Output > > ### *playerglobal.swc* > > The Adobe Flash Player *playerglobal.swc* (version 11.1) can be downloaded > from: > < > http://download.mac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

+1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.0/rc1/apache-royale-0.9.0-src.zip Java 1.8 OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives: y No unap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

-1 Binding I ran the ApproveRoyale.xml script. The build failed for me here: tests: [mkdir] Created dir: /Users/pent/temp/apache-royale-0.9.0-src/royale-compiler/compiler/target/ju nit-reports [mkdir] Created dir: /Users/pent/temp/apache-royale-0.9.0-src/royale-compiler/compiler/target/ju

FW: Compiling Royale Libraries with Flash Builder (SWF)

Is there any reason why there are no IDE files (.project, .actionSciriptProperties, etc.) in Basic in the git repo? They do exist for other projects (e.g. Core). I think some of my problems may be related to having some locally created such files. From: Yishay Weiss

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

On pipeline tests are skipped. If Om will try again without clean and have same result as me - I think we are good here. Thanks, Piotr 2018-01-09 10:35 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Alex, > > Yes they passed without the clean. :) > > Thanks, Piotr > > 2018-01-09 9:43 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >> I

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Alex, Yes they passed without the clean. :) Thanks, Piotr 2018-01-09 9:43 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > I just found out that the royals-compiler build on builds.a.o was not > running tests. > > I'm running the approval script on Windows right now. I'll probably go to > bed and check it in the morn

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

I just found out that the royals-compiler build on builds.a.o was not running tests. I'm running the approval script on Windows right now. I'll probably go to bed and check it in the morning. It passed on Mac for me. If you run Maven without a clean a second time on the royale-compiler folder d

Re: How to overwrite/change a components' default styles the royale way?

I guess I understand your point now. For the sake of completeness: I found that CSS definitions are applied from "top->down" by browsers. So if I understand it correctly: If it's always the case that the 'default Royale component styles' are defined at the top of the .css file, they will be 'over

Re: ant all failing (was Compiling Royale Libraries with Flash Builder (SWF))

The build generally checks for AIR_HOME in deciding whether to build SWF support or not. AIR_HOME/PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME/FLASHPLAYER_GLOBAL are a set of 3 you should either have or not have. Thanks, -Alex On 1/9/18, 12:28 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: >Following your mail I went over royale-asjs/README

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

I dont remember at all when I run tests last time. Im always using builds.a.o for the tests. As you said if they pass on builds.a.o we may be good. Letès check on pipeline https://builds.apache.org/job/Royale%20Pipeline/job/release%252F0.9.0/ Thanks, Piotr 2018-01-09 9:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :

RE: ant all failing (was Compiling Royale Libraries with Flash Builder (SWF))

Following your mail I went over royale-asjs/README again and discovered I didn’t have FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER env var set. Now that it’s set the build is finally successful. So my guess is that the problem was that I had PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME set but not FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER. If PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME is n

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Last time you ran these tests from the repo or a nightly did they pass? -Alex On 1/9/18, 12:18 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Alex, > >I just run the tests and have same issue as Om. It is something with an >order, cause tests first complaining about missing js.swc, later that swc >is being writt

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

Alex, I just run the tests and have same issue as Om. It is something with an order, cause tests first complaining about missing js.swc, later that swc is being written in the folder. [1] [1] https://paste.apache.org/wLFl Piotr 2018-01-09 8:37 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > > > On 1/8/18, 11:23 PM