Carlos,
That's wonderful news! I'm happy that has happened! :)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 11:56 PM Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> my thoughts on this are various: My perspective of Adobe as a company
> passed from a company that I love so much thanks to many products, and many
> actions done in
Carlos,
That would be great :)
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 12:00 AM Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> That's so real David,
>
> we know lots of clients that still are in Flex, and I'm planning some
> meetings to show what's Royale is capable. I think I'm near, since until
> now, without things like Jewel, that
Yes, will look at Alex's fixes tonight.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Om, Alex,
>
> I'm done for 0.9.3 with this changes, are you still planning on make a
> release this days?
>
> closing for today.
>
> thanks
>
> Carlos
>
> 2018-04-24 17:19 GMT+02:00 Carlos
Om, Alex,
I'm done for 0.9.3 with this changes, are you still planning on make a
release this days?
closing for today.
thanks
Carlos
2018-04-24 17:19 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira :
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to take advantage that the release has not yet been created to
> make this refactor so 0.9.3 come
I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation components to show
the work done
Something that aggregates all mx and spark components that we have now
emulated?
I'm interested in watch what we have actually.
thanks!
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
That's so real David,
we know lots of clients that still are in Flex, and I'm planning some
meetings to show what's Royale is capable. I think I'm near, since until
now, without things like Jewel, that was not possible, since you can sell
Royale showing a screen built with only Basic components, s
Hi Alex,
my thoughts on this are various: My perspective of Adobe as a company
passed from a company that I love so much thanks to many products, and many
actions done in the past years (I think it coincides with "product managers
become CEOs of the tech company" and that is noticed in directions
I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of other
issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to verify. If it
does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
HTH,
-Alex
On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
On 4/24/18, 8:
Hi Alex,
These are very important points. Folks - Adobe is focused elsewhere. From my
perspective they are focused on technologies originally based on Apache Sling,
Fellx and Jackrabbit. Managing Experience in the Cloud etc, AI, etcetera.
There is an opportunity for Royale Developers to convert
Hi,
just refactored a bit the Apache Royale AMF test client with Jewel.
https://twitter.com/ApacheRoyale/status/988819284553060352
Created a page in the wiki with instructions on how to run it:
https://t.co/StiF4TOJFy
I plan to add more communication examples to the client soon.
Enjoy! :)
--
On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take the time to
> find out.
>
> Try this one:
http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royal
This is not an official Adobe statement, just my personal opinion. Adobe is
not "investing" in Apache Royale. Adobe is "generously donating resources".
Probably well past one million dollars so far. An investment usually has an
expected payback. A charitable donation does not. Adobe is un
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take the time to
> find out.
>
> Try this one:
> http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz
Maybe, but I would think that almost all complex views are putting children
inside a DIV and UIBase's createElement creates that DIV for you, and early
enough for it to be parented in addedToParent. The View shouldn't really have
to be created early in the lifecycle. The initial setting of pro
Hi,
I'm going to take advantage that the release has not yet been created to
make this refactor so 0.9.3 comes with this names correctly, hope to have
it in the next few hours
2018-04-21 9:04 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira :
> Hi,
>
> thinking in release 0.9.3 I believe I could make some changes to ma
I do like simple-js-only but that's not really what it could be. I didn't
turn off the SWF build for the repo because I thought maybe I (or someone
else) would go back and add the SWF side. I did write that at this point
it is JS-only, but it still stands as possible to add SWF.
We have -asjs whic
I think things will be converging until we reach 2020 and Flash Player will
be removed from Browsers.
So we should expect more a more things happening in Apache Royale. Both
users coming, people wanting to migrate from Flex to Royale, and Royale
becoming more a more ready to solve many problems out
Hi Peter,
>My time on this mission is drawing to a close in a couple of weeks. I am
actively trying to find a new >position within Adobe. I hope to continue to
participate in the Royale project...
Keep in mind that "A magic dwells in each beginning..." (Hermann Hesse,
German poem) ;-)
However, le
maybe better saying what's in and not what's out. For example
"royale-simple-js-only" ?
just my 2 :)
2018-04-24 8:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> IMO, "simple" is too subjective. IMO, the name should indicate the key
> differentiators. So "no-swf" might be part of the name.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
Hi Piotr,
in our SampleAmfWebApp I want to write in the wiki but as Alex said you
should do in target:
java -jar sampleamfwebapp-0.9.3-SNAPSHOT-exec.war
This will run jetty and deploy the war with the example overplayed. Then in
a browser put http://localhost:8080, and you'll see the example wor
Hi Alex,
I'm thinking about this and suppose that the way to overcome it, with the
actual code, is simply to left "createElement()" empty and make all things
in the View. That will end with the same right?
thanks
Carlos
2018-04-23 19:44 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> IMO, consistency is the killer
I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take the time to find
out.
Try this one:
http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz
If that works, that will confirm the problem, which is that
Still seeing the same issue.
Screenshot here: https://snag.gy/jBxIZs.jpg
Command used to install:
npm install
http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz
-g
Expected:
Install js-only Royale SDK, i.
23 matches
Mail list logo
