FYI. We are in discussion with NASA JPL on using SDAP for planetary science.
thanks
Thomas
Thomas Huang
Group Supervisor, Data Product Generation Software
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
(818) 354-2747
On Dec 4,
This might just be me being nitpicky, but I think it should be
analytics with an s and wondering if we should say "integrated data
analytics center for big Earth science problems?" Should we emphasize
Earth here versus science in general? Understandably, there isn't
anything preventing SDAP from
So something like
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
The phrase "focusing on technology integration, advancement and maturity” seems
to be a little superfluous. It is not description, but more of a mission
statement. Could you remove it? I think that
SDAP is… an integrated data analytic center for Big Science problems
is a perfect description
Already done! (Pending PMC choices)
---
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for
Might be worth generating a draft graduation resolution. In that resolution
there are a couple of things to discuss — a description of the project, initial
PMC (are there any committers/PPMC members who do NOT want to join the PMC) and
initial PMC chair.
> On Dec 4, 2023, at 3:59 PM, Riley
Ok, I've cleared all the red flags.
I used today's date for dates I didn't know. I don't know if that's ok.
Still waiting for the name search before we can proceed.
I think once that's done and (hopefully) approved, we can proceed to vote!
On 2023/12/01 22:07:09 Julian Hyde wrote:
> I checked
I created a Jira case [1] with my findings in the name search
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-216
On 2023/12/01 22:07:09 Julian Hyde wrote:
> I checked SDAP’s roster page on Whimsy [1], and there are 4 red items that
> need to be done before graduation. I don’t know
The sites seem to have been rebuilt but the red flags are still there...
@Julian, did I miss something?
On 2023/12/04 22:10:20 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Ok I updated sdap.xml to reflect the project's status as best I could.
>
> - Added releases to the News section
> - Updated table for mailing
On it! Making notes of what I'm finding where, archiving URLs for searches and
entries where possible.
On 2023/12/04 21:39:20 Julian Hyde wrote:
> You should document what you did, and what you discovered, in the Jira case.
> Evidence that you have searched and found nothing will help get this
Ok I updated sdap.xml to reflect the project's status as best I could.
- Added releases to the News section
- Updated table for mailing lists, source repos, mentors, and committers
- Added dates in the Copyright and Verify distribution rights sections.
(Replaced -..-.. with today's date)
You should document what you did, and what you discovered, in the Jira case.
Evidence that you have searched and found nothing will help get this to
approval. SDAP is an unusual name, so it’s no surprise to me that there are few
clashes.
> On Dec 4, 2023, at 9:08 AM, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
>
Thomas,
Thanks for looking into it. Sorry it was a false alarm. It’s likely that those
red flags exist because the incubation metadata is out of date.
It’s worthwhile to spend the time updating the metadata. I believe the
following are the important files:
*
Hey Julian,
I'm also starting up with a Podling Name Search, though I'm having difficulties
with the USPTO search. I followed the syntax documented in [1] but was
receiving syntax errors. I instead tried a field tag search for 'CM:SDAP' and
'CM:"Science Data Analytics Platform"' with no
14 matches
Mail list logo
