ining, and mentoring
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
> -Original Message-
> From: samju [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 3:54 AM
> To: dev@shale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
>
>
> Hello!!
&g
Hello!!
Where do we can get support for Shale?? MyFaces forum?
thx, Sam
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
> On 10/21/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> >
>> > > * Dialog Manager
>> > > * Dialog Manager (Basic Implementation)
>> > > * Dialog Manager (SCXML Implementation
That's a very good idea..
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 10:27 AM
> To: dev@shale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
>
> I use the Testing framework. So does Tomahawk.
I use the Testing framework. So does Tomahawk.
I suggest creating a release based on the latest snapshot for Shale
before it goes dormant or is moved to MyFaces. That way projects that
are using snapshots will have a release.
Paul Spencer
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
I sent out an e-mail
> > - ViewController/Dialog: I hope Orchestra can take in what makes sense
> > here (the notion of subflows which
>
> I like Orchesta a lot, but I don't think the view controller/dialog features
> should be tied to Spring
I see two configuration options - Spring and annotations. The managed
be
e a place for abandoned sandbox stuff too.
> > > I know, the word 'maintainer' is not well placed in the context of an
> > apache
> > > community, but in the end I think it would be fair to show to users
> > that no
> > > one is really working on a
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 3:16 AM
> To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
>
> For me, a merger makes sense.
Seems almost unanimous :-).
Greg Reddin schrieb:
If this is turning into a vote we should specify what +1 and -1 means. Does
-1 mean "no, don't port it" or "no we have to have this"? :-)
I'd say a -1 means it will end up in an "MyFaces dormant" project. If we
agree having one at all.
Ciao,
Mario
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavel Savara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:15 PM
> To: dev@shale.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces
>
> >but I'm having a hard time seeing benefits over Facelets and Clay.
>
&
://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Reddin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 11:47 AM
> To: dev@shale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
>
> On 10/22/07, Antonio Petrelli <
emoting.
Seems to me it'd be easy to implement JSF 2.0 in MyFaces if we're already
maintaining a similar code base...
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Kito D. Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 17:49
> > An: dev@sh
is definitly possible in clay.
> Pavel
>
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Reddin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:47 PM
> To: dev@shale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
>
>
> On 10/22/07, Antonio
g
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
On 10/22/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Tiles works with FreeMarker and Struts 2 too. And sincerely I think that
> it
> could be used for JSF users, if it only gets more support (don't look at
> me,
>
> McClanahan
> > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 01:48
> > An: MyFaces Development; Shale Developers List
> > Betreff: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > * Remoting
> > > > Unsure, as most of this can be done with PP
On 10/22/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Tiles works with FreeMarker and Struts 2 too. And sincerely I think that
> it
> could be used for JSF users, if it only gets more support (don't look at
> me,
> I don't know anything about JSF :-) ).
It could be used, but I'm not sure
On 10/21/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > * Tiles Integration
> > > See Clay.
> >
> > +0 I'll abstain here and since I don't know much about the Tiles side of
> > things. Let's just say that I think Tiles integration should "just work"
> in
> > MyFaces and Shale.
>
> Like
On 10/21/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is one class[1] and despite what the shale-tiles pom[2] declares,
> it doesn't relate to/depend on any other parts of shale - just JSF and
> Tiles. So it could just as easily be moved to the tiles TLP. Having
> said that, I suggested
If this is turning into a vote we should specify what +1 and -1 means. Does
-1 mean "no, don't port it" or "no we have to have this"? :-)
Greg
On 10/21/07, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Application Controller
> > Don't know. I thought action oriented frameworks are outdated, th
On 10/20/07, Kito D. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about the
> possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has become
> somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have the
> code base at
On 10/21/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > > * Dialog Manager
> > > * Dialog Manager (Basic Implementation)
> > > * Dialog Manager (SCXML Implementation)
> > > The Dialog Manager might be a next step for MyFaces Orchestra. Anyway,
> > > I
> > > hope that one of
2007/10/22, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > > * Tiles Integration
> > > See Clay.
> >
> > +0 I'll abstain here and since I don't know much about the Tiles side of
> > things. Let's just say that I think Tiles integration should "just work"
> in
> > MyFaces and Shale.
>
> Likely
A couple of notes embedded below.
On 10/21/07, Kito D. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > > I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about
> > the
> > > possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has
> > become
> > > somewhat stale, and I'd rat
On 10/21/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> > I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about the
> > possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has become
> > somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have the
> Hi!
> > I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about
> the
> > possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has
> become
> > somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than
> have the
> > code base atrophy The overwhelming consensus fo
-- Original message --
From: "Dennis Byrne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +1 from me, but only if my logo contest entry is retroactively promoted to
> the official Shale logo.
>
LOL!
> http://shale.apache.org/logo-contest.html
>
> Dennis Byrne
>
> On 10/20/07, Kito D. M
>From: Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi!
> > I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about the
> > possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has become
> > somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have the
> > co
By accident I sent my answer to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only.
If possible, we should discuss this topic just in [EMAIL PROTECTED], no?
I'd like to invent every Shale developer not yet at [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
subscribe there too.
Is this an option?
Ciao,
Mario
Kito D. Mann schrieb:
Hello everyone,
Hi!
I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about the
possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has become
somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have the
code base atrophy The overwhelming consensus for the Shale list is "y
+1 from me, but only if my logo contest entry is retroactively promoted to
the official Shale logo.
http://shale.apache.org/logo-contest.html
Dennis Byrne
On 10/20/07, Kito D. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so
29 matches
Mail list logo
