Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 16:42 +0200, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > described in SLING-8584 [1]. Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Carsten Ziegeler, Daniel Klco, Radu Cotescu, Robert Munteanu, Stefan Seifert

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Toby being the main developer behind vault also spent a significant time to decouple the whole ‚frontend‘ & communication part from packagemanager & the vault plugin when contributing. The file slingpackager/cmds/package.js is doing exactly the same as filevault-package-maven-plugin that li

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:42 PM Robert Munteanu wrote: > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > described in SLING-8584 [1]... +1 -Bertrand

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

+1 Le mar. 27 août 2019 à 19:52, Karl Pauls a écrit : > +1 > > regards, > > Karl > > On Monday, August 26, 2019, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > > described in SLING-8584 [1]. > > > > This majority vote is open for at le

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

+1 regards, Karl On Monday, August 26, 2019, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Hi, > > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > described in SLING-8584 [1]. > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks, > > Robert > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Hi all , Being a fresh committee to Jackrabbit I certainly can’t speak for the rest but historically we seperated out as much as possible concerning the http communication. Toby being the main developer behind vault also spent a significant time to decouple the whole ‚frontend‘ & communication pa

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Hi Konrad, On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 14:55 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: > For me the situation looks a bit slightly different: I raised a > concern in > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7699b02a090d0397d661721f47a6d70b72fb83ff372fafb7d45e6f5e@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E >

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

(pressed the wrong button, sorry) So I wanted to add that even that the discussion now is a bit late, looking rationally at where to put it, it just think it make sense to put it to Jackrabbit (@Ruben: both AEM and Composum are just UI Layers to the FileVault API, see e.g. [1]). -Georg [1]

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:10 PM Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > ...I think the tool should land at the community that cares the most about > it. Tbh, I think this is Sling at this point +1 and that's also where it has been offered so makes sense to me. -Bertrand

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Thanks Konrad and Georg, I somehow also didn't really realize that it was summer holiday at that time :) I think the tool should land at the community that cares the most about it. Tbh, I think this is Sling at this point. And yes, we can move it to Jackrabbit later on if that turns out to b

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Hi Carsten, sorry for the late comment/bad timing (somehow the message in July slipped). Also I think we all agree that the contribution itself is a great addition. On 2019-08-27 14:33, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: TBH I find this conversation a little bit strange. We have a contribution, this

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

For me the situation looks a bit slightly different: I raised a concern in https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7699b02a090d0397d661721f47a6d70b72fb83ff372fafb7d45e6f5e@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

TBH I find this conversation a little bit strange. We have a contribution, this contribution has been made to us, the Apache Sling project. The suggestion with contributing to Jackrabbit has been discussed over a month ago and it seemed no one had an issue with accepting this contribution in Sl

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

the slingpackager is meant to work against content management systems built on sling. It currently supports package managers by - Composum - AEM If there are other package managers in the future I'd love to add support for them as well. We interact with sling to install packages, not with

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

I fully agree with that statement. Actually there is already a task at FileVault to have an installation endpoint (accompanied by a branch): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-151 For all those reasons I would also rather like to see t

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Hi, I also have my doubts... reasoning to have it in Sling from [2]: since the tool packages and deploys it is dependent Jackrabbit-Vault for the package format and on Apache Sling and Composum for the upload/install/list/uninstall/delete endpoint. I'd honestly much prefer for it to be an Apac

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

ah, ok - then +1 stean >-Original Message- >From: Robert Munteanu >Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 11:05 AM >To: dev@sling.apache.org >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING- >8584 > >Hi Stefan, > >On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 08:

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Hi Stefan, On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 08:49 +, Stefan Seifert wrote: > i'm not against adding it to sling, but maybe the jackrabbit project > would also be a good place for it? alongside with [1]? This was (summarily) discussed at [2]. Don't have a strong opinion either way, just relaying the answ

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

i'm not against adding it to sling, but maybe the jackrabbit project would also be a good place for it? alongside with [1]? stefan [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault-package-maven-plugin/ >-Original Message- >From: Robert Munteanu >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 4:43 PM >To: de

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 16:42 +0200, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > described in SLING-8584 [1]. +1 Robert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

+1 > On 26 Aug 2019, at 16:42, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > described in SLING-8584 [1].

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

+1 On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 12:08 PM Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > +1 > > Carsten > > Am 26.08.2019 um 16:42 schrieb Robert Munteanu: > > Hi, > > > > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > > described in SLING-8584 [1]. > > > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

+1 Carsten Am 26.08.2019 um 16:42 schrieb Robert Munteanu: Hi, Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module described in SLING-8584 [1]. This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Robert [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8584 -- -- Carste

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

+1 - Andy > On Aug 26, 2019, at 7:42 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Hi, > > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > described in SLING-8584 [1]. > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks, > > Robert > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br