Re: Clean-up of SpamAssassin PMC/Committers

On 2/3/2014 5:58 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: One of the duties of the PMC is to maintain the quality of the community for SpamAssassin. And one of the ways this is done is to give credit where credit is due. I therefore propose that all committers/PMC members that have not not committed anyt

[Bug 6962] Implement the missing dump_db_toks() to Redis bayes backend (used by sa-learn --dump)

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6962 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.0 |3.4.1 --- Comment #6 from Ke

[Bug 6422] $VERSION = 'bogus'; is bad.

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6422 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 6639] SA won't build on Suse 11.4 from cpan

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6639 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 7000] dnsbl_subtests.t hangs on Windows

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7000 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kmcgr...@pccc.com Target M

[Bug 7000] New: dnsbl_subtests.t hangs on Windows

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7000 Bug ID: 7000 Summary: dnsbl_subtests.t hangs on Windows Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.4 SVN branch Hardware: PC OS: Windows XP Status: NEW Sev

Re: [VOTE] Availability of SpamAssassin 3.4.0-rc6 Release

Mark wrote: . Raspberry PI under Raspbian (Debian 7.2 (wheezy) on ARM), perl 5.14.2 Kevin wrote: It kills me that you are checking this. Is this just a whim or are there people using ARM clusters with SpamAssassin? It is mostly just for fun. Actually it's the closest machine I have with a L

Re: Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #9383

On 2/6/2014 5:23 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote: On 02/06/2014 09:55 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 2/6/2014 1:10 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote: > > > On 02/06/2014 06:05 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > > > See

Re: [VOTE] Availability of SpamAssassin 3.4.0-rc6 Release

On 2014-02-06 23:09, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 2/6/2014 9:16 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: . Raspberry PI under Raspbian (Debian 7.2 (wheezy) on ARM), perl 5.14.2 It kills me that you are checking this. Is this just a whim or are there people using ARM clusters with SpamAssassin? i could chime i

Re: Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #9383

On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote: On 02/06/2014 09:55 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 2/6/2014 1:10 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote: > > > On 02/06/2014 06:05 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > > > See > >

Re: [VOTE] Availability of SpamAssassin 3.4.0-rc6 Release

On 2/6/2014 9:16 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: . Raspberry PI under Raspbian (Debian 7.2 (wheezy) on ARM), perl 5.14.2 It kills me that you are checking this. Is this just a whim or are there people using ARM clusters with SpamAssassin? regards, KAM

Re: Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #9383

On 02/06/2014 09:55 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 2/6/2014 1:10 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote: On 02/06/2014 06:05 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: See John Pls copy __BUGGED_IMG to your sandbox. D

Re: Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #9383

On 2/6/2014 1:10 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote: On 02/06/2014 06:05 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: See John Pls copy __BUGGED_IMG to your sandbox. Done. Can you wait until the weekend to start cle

Re: Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #9383

On 02/06/2014 07:10 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote: On 02/06/2014 06:05 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: See John Pls copy __BUGGED_IMG to your sandbox. Done. Can you wait until the weekend to start

Re: Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #9383

On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote: On 02/06/2014 06:05 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: See John Pls copy __BUGGED_IMG to your sandbox. Done. Can you wait until the weekend to start cleaning stuff up? -- John Hardin KA7OHZ

[Bug 6995] specify user to fall back for spamd instead of nobody

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995 --- Comment #7 from Benny Pedersen --- okay, good, its just that as a gentoo maintainer i would not change raw files, but provide needed changes in ebuild to go virtual_user or system_user where it cant be enabled both at the same time

Re: Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #9383

On 02/06/2014 06:05 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: See John Pls copy __BUGGED_IMG to your sandbox. Thx

Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #9383

See

[Bug 6995] specify user to fall back for spamd instead of nobody

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |3.4.1 Severity|nor

[Bug 6999] RULE COMMITERS - dependency identification

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6999 John Hardin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jhar...@impsec.org --- Comment #1

Jenkins build became unstable: SpamAssassin-trunk #9382

See

[Bug 6999] New: RULE COMMITERS - dependency identification

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6999 Bug ID: 6999 Summary: RULE COMMITERS - dependency identification Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Sev

[Bug 6995] specify user to fall back for spamd instead of nobody

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995 --- Comment #5 from Benny Pedersen --- okay my fault, is this still a spamassassin problem ? would it not be mainer packagement way to setup spamd as running on non privileged user if only virtual users is needed in spamc ? http://www.

Re: [VOTE] Availability of SpamAssassin 3.4.0-rc6 Release

> On behalf of the PMC, the ASF SpamAssassin Project is pleased to > announce the availability of our sixth release candidate for 3.4.0 > subject to vote by the PMC under lazy consensus. The key changes in this > version are the round-robin changes from bug 6996 when using spamd with > both ipv6 an