Hi all,
I am interested in participating in GSOC 2018 and been looking at the issue
and playing a bit with Stanbol. I am a student from the University of
Cuenca. I have been working with Semantic technologies and currently in my
third year of college.
Well just a quick overview of what I understa
Hi,
I have been working in my proposal and wanted to make the most of bounding
period by interacting with the community and the tool. I have been working
in the proposal and would like to share it with my prospective mentor.
Anyone from Apache who would like to mentorship?
Regards,
~Kamila.
On T
Hi Kamila,
Sorry for the late response, but I wanted wait for Andreas to answer
this as I do not really agree with him tagging STANBOL-1327 with
GSoC2018.
IMHO this would be not a good topic as it is much to simple and small
(I would expect a maximum of 2 working days to complete this feature).
M
Hi Rupert.
Thanks so much Rupert for your answer. Do you think the project will go for
GSoC? I have been looking at Squebi, and if it is too short, we can try to
fix some other issue.
Regards,
~Kamila.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Rupert Westenthaler <
rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Kamila
Stanbol has very little ongoing development - mostly fixing bugs.
While their are for sure topics of interests - especially related to
information extraction and classification - I do not know if we would
be able to find 2 Developers plan to be active enough for Mentoring.
For me the GS
Thanks Rupert for you answer. I understand it. I was really interested in
Stanbol, so I guess I will keep looking at some other project for GSoC.
However, If anyone is interested in mentoring, I am still looking forward
to contribute.
Regards,
~Kamila.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:02 AM, Rupert Weste
Hi Kamila and Rupert,
Sorry for my very belated reply.
The intention of tagging the issue with GSOC 2018 was that it could be
resolved in a GSOC-project.
Yes, it alone would not be enough for such a project and therefore
significantly more work would need to be included.
The main problem seems
Hi Andreas,
Can you or the student elaborate here a little bit the idea for the project?
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:26 AM Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Hi Kamila and Rupert,
>
> Sorry for my very belated reply.
>
> The intention of tagging the issue with GSOC 2018 was that it could be
> resol
Hi all,
Rafa the idea would be use Squebi as the default Sparql Endpoint instead of
the one being used now [1]. However, Rupert point out that task would be
really short. So, I say we can add some issues too. Or what do you suggest?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1327
Regards,
Hi Andreas,
I don't have a plenty of time this year, but I think I can find a bit of
time and act as a mentor for this GSoC year.
Regards
2018-03-10 4:53 GMT+01:00 Kamila Molina Orellana
:
> Hi all,
>
> Rafa the idea would be use Squebi as the default Sparql Endpoint instead of
> the one being
Hi,
Great Antonio , thanks!! :D Then, I would keep working in my proposal and
share with you for some feedback. Also, can we define some issues that I
can work on? Or what could be the extra work? Until then, I will look at
some issues/code to get some idea of the work.
Regards,
~Kamila.
On Mon,
Hi,
I am working into my proposal. I think it would be a good a idea to define
some ground work that I can work after moving to Squebi. I was looking at
some of the issues, and there are some really interesting However, I am
afraid mostly for the time. Specifically, since I have been doing and
lea
Hi,
Disambiguation is interesting for sure, but also a very broad topic.
So please make sure to describe scope and possible solutions (e.g.
approach + frameworks) to the problem.
A dummy example based on STANBOL-320 this could be
* approach: process extracted named entities; filter all with more
Hi Rupert,
Thanks for your answer.
I was seeing STANBOL-320 mostly as data cleaning/management issue. I will
try to describe the scope and possible solutions.
However, until we define that, I think it is better to leave my proposal
with an open issue. Just to reiterate, I can say that I will exc
Hi Kamila,
I'm probably late to the discussion because you have already made a nice
progress on the proposal but I just wanted to put another topic on the
table which in my opinion could be quite suitable for a GSoC project. It
has to do with a new EntityHub Yard implementation. ATM there are (as
Hi,
Thanks Rafa, that sounds cool. That is the reason I wanted to leave open
the possibility to work on a different activity. Will you be up to mentor
this task with Andreas? According to the timeline [1], organizations are
reviewing and selecting proposals.
~Regards,
Kamila.
[1] https://summer
Hi Kamila,
I could made an effort an tried to co-mentor the project, but prior to that
you would have to modify and extend your proposal covering the new
discussed tasks. That could take you some time, I'm not sure even if you
are allowed to modify the proposal at this point
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018
Hi Rafa,
Great news, but I cannot modify the final proposal since I had submitted a
PDF format, and I cannot edit after the deadline. However, I can edit the
proposal in Google Doc, and detail the new tasks that will be implemented.
What do you think?
Regards,
~Kamila.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:
18 matches
Mail list logo