I'm +1 for oAuth with non expiry token.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
> Hi Lakmal, Imesh
>
> Came up with another solution.
>
> *Prerequisites* : SM's public key should be installed into metadata
> service
>
> SM generate a key pair for each instance at the time of comp
Hi Udara,
I think search is a different concept. IMO we shouldn't remove it. In
search case, what you pass is not need to be the exact tenantDomain, but
any string.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
> HI Nirmal,
>
> I made the following changes
>
> retrieveTenants > /tenant
Hi Lakmal, Imesh
Came up with another solution.
*Prerequisites* : SM's public key should be installed into metadata service
SM generate a key pair for each instance at the time of composite
application deployment and that will be sing by SM
Common name of the public key is set to applicationID
g
HI Nirmal,
I made the following changes
retrieveTenants > /tenants
retrievePartialSearchTenants > /tenants/{tenantDomain}
Since we have /tenants/{tenantDomain} already, we don't need
isDomainAvailable. I made the correction for retrieveTenants
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Nirmal Fernan
Shouldn't we consider a cluster is active if there is "atleast one" active
member?
Even If a cluster is defined its min count as 3, it can serve the requests
as soon as one instance gets activated, without waiting for other two
instances.
Our instance starting / activation process happens sequenti
Hi Sajith,
>From UI side it considers active when there is atleast one active member.
CLI has implemented it in a different manner.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Sajith Kariyawasam
wrote:
> Shouldn't we consider a cluster is active if there is "atleast one" active
> member?
>
> Even If a c
This API method is correct since it's a different function i.e. search. So,
tenants/search/{tenantDomain} is fine.
I think the one I suggested in the other thread is also wrong for
retrieveTenants.
if it is all tenants(retrieveTenants); GET /tenants/
if it is 1 tenant; GET /tenants/{tenantDomain}
Hi Nirmal,
We already have getTenants() which should be /tenants/{tenantDomain}
@GET
@Path("tenant/search/{tenantDomain}")
@Consumes("application/json")
@Produces("application/json")
@AuthorizationAction("/permission/protected/manage/monitor/tenants")
@SuperTenantService(tru
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Maharachchi updated STRATOS-637:
--
Affects Version/s: 4.0.0
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
> Cannot configure CEP credential
+1 for GET /tenants/{tenantDomain}
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have the following REST API method which IMO should be
> removed/deprecated. IMO it is not the RESTfull way of doing. Client should
> determine the availability of domain by sending a GET /te
In the current code base also, we are considering the first private IP of
the member in LB.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hi Imesh,
>
> I am modifying topology to include multiple private/public IPs. So now
> member object is having a list of private IPs and a li
Hi Imesh,
I am modifying topology to include multiple private/public IPs. So now
member object is having a list of private IPs and a list of public IPs.
Which public IP LB should use? Can we get the first IP as default for
routing?
Thanks.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wr
Hi Martin,
In a Service Group, we do not have runtime data, as aliases and other
relevant subscription data are provided in the application deployment.
If you need to start two instances of the same cartridge type, what you can
do is to put them in the application itself without using a group, an
Hi,
We have the following REST API method which IMO should be
removed/deprecated. IMO it is not the RESTfull way of doing. Client should
determine the availability of domain by sending a GET /tenants/{domains}
and determine the availability by looking at the response of it.
Further this should be
Hi Udara,
Yes, I confirmed, there are real use cases where we have dependencies on the
same cartridge type but different subscriptions, one is an example of active /
standby scenario another one a scenario to patch / upgrade the system.
Quoting the response below:
ns-01 and ns-02 are instance
Hi Udara,
No problem, I was just wondering if it is supported or not.
On the other hand we might have a real use case, let me follow up on this
Thanks
Martin
From: Udara Liyanage [mailto:ud...@wso2.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 6:16 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [grouping][question] cart
Hi Martin,
Creating another cartridge type is just changing the type parameter of the
existing cartridge json if you are using the base image approach and
deploying the new json.
If the requirement is only the easiness in testing, I don't think
implementing this feasibility is necessary given th
In the dependency section of a service group (or application) we define the
startup sequence using the following format:
Service group :
...
,
"dependencies": {
"startupOrders": [
"cartridge.type1,cartridge.type2,cartridge.type3"
],
"terminationBeh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14218544#comment-14218544
]
Martin Eppel commented on STRATOS-985:
--
also uploaded the app and group definitions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Eppel updated STRATOS-985:
-
Attachment: group7c.json
group6c.json
group5c.json
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Eppel updated STRATOS-985:
-
Attachment: wso2carbon.terminate.log.gz
wso2carbon.startup.log.gz
...startup... l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Eppel updated STRATOS-993:
-
Description:
tried to undeploy application("test_app5"), expected spun up VM to be killed
but no
Martin Eppel created STRATOS-993:
Summary: [grouping][testing] application undeploy not working
Key: STRATOS-993
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-993
Project: Stratos
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Eppel updated STRATOS-993:
-
Attachment: wso2carbon.app_undeploy.log
> [grouping][testing] application undeploy not working
>
Raj, since we have added it to the topology, let's terminate and send the
event. +1 from me.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Even if we didn't add it to the topology, at least we need to terminate
> the instance right? But we can't send the member terminated event t
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Jeffrey Nguyen (jeffrngu) <
jeffr...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> I think it's probably less confusing if we use the terms "private IP"
> and "fixed private IP" (or "predefined private IP").
>
Yes. We will use the words *private IP*, *fixed private IP*, *floating IP*
a
Hi Jeffrey,
Please see my comments inline.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jeffrey Nguyen (jeffrngu) <
jeffr...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi Rajkumar,
>
> Looks like you made some very good progress on this enhancement. I have
> the following comments/questions:
>
>- Currently Stratos uses th
I think it's probably less confusing if we use the terms "private IP" and
"fixed private IP" (or "predefined private IP").
-Jeffrey
From: Rajkumar Rajaratnam mailto:rajkum...@wso2.com>>
Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 11:58 AM
To: "dev@stratos.apache.org"
mail
Hi Rajkumar,
Looks like you made some very good progress on this enhancement. I have the
following comments/questions:
* Currently Stratos uses the property named "autoAssignIp" in cartridge
json to decide whether it needs to allocate floating IP for a given instance.
Is that still valid
Even if we didn't add it to the topology, at least we need to terminate the
instance right? But we can't send the member terminated event though.
Thanks.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> Yes, if we added it to the topology, then we should send member terminated
> event
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have implemented this feature and it is fully functional now. I had to
> upgrade Jclouds version to 1.8.1 in order to implement it using neutron
> networking API.
>
> Let me explain how it works now. I will past network i
Yes, if we added it to the topology, then we should send member terminated
event. (earlier it wasn't the case!)
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> correction //Are you saying that we can't *send* the member terminated
> event if the member is not in the topology?//
>
>
This is discussed here;
Failed to terminate member Error appearing repeatedly
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> correction //Are you saying that we can't *send* the member terminated
> event if the member is not in the topology?//
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:09 AM
correction //Are you saying that we can't *send* the member terminated
event if the member is not in the topology?//
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Yes member is not added to the topology.
>
> But we have returned the member context to AS ans AS added the member t
Yes member is not added to the topology.
But we have returned the member context to AS ans AS added the member to
pending member list. So if IP allocation goes wrong and if we are not
terminating the instance at this point, it will take another 15 min to spin
up a replacement.
Are you saying that
+1 currently list application just view the output of GET /application/appId
Needs to show the status too. CLI can make GET calls to each
cluster/group/cartridge and get status. Cluster id , group ids are fetched
in /application/appid call.
Touched, not typed. Erroneous words are a feature, not
Agree with Jeffrey. I too do not think we need to move it to subscription,
since as a subscriber, you have no idea what n/w interfaces, what IPs you
should use.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jeffrey Nguyen (jeffrngu) <
jeffr...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When fixed IP is defined in a cart
Hi,
When fixed IP is defined in a cartridge, it is considered static cartridge.
We need to unsubscribe it before attempting to resubscribe. The use case for
fixed ip is when we have a deployment where certain VM needs to have fixed Ips
for their corresponding NICs so that they can be manag
Raj,
At this point have we added the member to the topology? We send the member
spawned only after a successful IP allocation according to
https://github.com/apache/stratos/blob/master/components/org.apache.stratos.cloud.controller/src/main/java/org/apache/stratos/cloud/controller/impl/CloudContro
List-applications doesn’t show much besides the application deployed and an
application is a composite structure, consisting of groups and cartrdiges. I
think it would be helpful to show as part of list-applications to show the
groups, cartridges and their state as well. In 4.0.0 list-subscribed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14218236#comment-14218236
]
Martin Eppel commented on STRATOS-986:
--
Hi Isuru, I changed the dependency as sugges
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Eppel updated STRATOS-986:
-
Attachment: wso2carbon.11-19.log.gz
group5-11-19.json
application_
Touched, not typed. Erroneous words are a feature, not a typo.
On Nov 19, 2014 11:18 PM, "Rajkumar Rajaratnam" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So I went through the master branch code and found $Subject.
> If predefined floating IP allocation goes wrong, we are terminating the
instance but not sending member t
Hi,
So I went through the master branch code and found $Subject.
- If predefined floating IP allocation goes wrong, we are terminating
the instance but not sending member terminated event, which will leads to
lot of problems :)
- If floating IP allocation goes wrong, we don't even t
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Touched, not typed. Erroneous words are a feature, not a typo.
> On Nov 19, 2014 8:13 PM, "Chamila De Alwis" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Given the list of members in a cluster, we can determine the number of
> active members and the
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Dakshika Jayathilaka
wrote:
> We are creating groups using cartridges or groups. So how about "*Cartridge
> Groups*" ?
>
That is also meaningful. But i felt just "group" would be better as groups
can be children of one group, not only the cartridges.
Thanks.
>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> I understand that if we add a fixedIp in network interfaces sectio
Thanks all for the input.
Yes there can be some usecases. I added this feature in neutron network
too. I just wanted verify before doing it.
Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> As Reka mentioned there can be only one subscription(or an application in
>
Touched, not typed. Erroneous words are a feature, not a typo.
On Nov 19, 2014 8:13 PM, "Chamila De Alwis" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Given the list of members in a cluster, we can determine the number of
active members and their partition ids. This in turn can be used to
determine the min count of each p
Hi Raj,
As Reka mentioned there can be only one subscription(or an application in
new terminology) of this cartridge. This is useful in cases where someone
wants to guarantee that instance get assigned a predefined IP.
Yes this will fail if the IP is not a available.
Touched, not typed. Erroneo
Hi,
I'm getting below error on *groups *endpoint. Need to add this to Stratos
new UXD
curl -X GET -H “Content-Type: application/json” -k -v -u admin:admin
https://localhost:9443/api/v4.1/groups
TID: [0] [STRATOS] [2014-11-19 20:21:20,425] ERROR
{org.apache.stratos.rest.endpoint.handlers.CustomT
Hi,
Given the list of members in a cluster, we can determine the number of
active members and their partition ids. This in turn can be used to
determine the min count of each partition.
Can it be said that the particular cluster is "Active", if the number of
"Active" members are equal to the sum
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> Thanks Dakshika. So, what does it actually contains?
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Dakshika Jayathilaka
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nirmal,
>>
>> Yes currently it name as you mentioned. Udara raised suggestion with term
>> "Service Groups" i
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I understand that if we add a fixedIp in network interfaces section,
>> instance will get the fixed ip to the corresponding NIC.
>> "networkInt
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> You could find some info https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-493
>
Thanks a lot Nirmal. This is a useful link. I will go though it.
>
> I ccied Martin and Jeffrey, they will probably be able to help you.
>
> On Wed,
Missed to add some important stuffs.
This feature is only for openstack with neutron networking environment. You
need to set a property in cloud-controller xml to specify whether you are
using neutron network or not.
org.apache.stratos.cloud.controller.iaases.OpenstackNovaIaas
Thanks Dakshika. So, what does it actually content?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Dakshika Jayathilaka
wrote:
> Hi Nirmal,
>
> Yes currently it name as you mentioned. Udara raised suggestion with term
> "Service Groups" instead of "Application Groups".
>
> *Dakshika Jayathilaka*
> Software E
Hi Nirmal,
Yes currently it name as you mentioned. Udara raised suggestion with
term "Service
Groups" instead of "Application Groups".
*Dakshika Jayathilaka*
Software Engineer
WSO2, Inc.
lean.enterprise.middleware
0771100911
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> I'm -1 sin
I'm -1 since for me Cartridge Groups doesn't make sense if it shows
applications. Why can't we simply group 'Applications' and 'Application
Groups' separately?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Dakshika Jayathilaka
wrote:
> We are creating groups using cartridges or groups. So how about "*Cartrid
Mariangela Hills created STRATOS-992:
Summary: Resource path /cluster/clusterId/{clusterId} does not
follow standard
Key: STRATOS-992
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-992
Project
We are creating groups using cartridges or groups. So how about "*Cartridge
Groups*" ?
WDYT?
*Dakshika Jayathilaka*
Software Engineer
WSO2, Inc.
lean.enterprise.middleware
0771100911
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dakshika Jayat
Hi all,
I have implemented this feature and it is fully functional now. I had to
upgrade Jclouds version to 1.8.1 in order to implement it using neutron
networking API.
Let me explain how it works now. I will past network interfaces section of
cartridge definition and explain each features implem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mariangela Hills updated STRATOS-989:
-
Description:
The following resource paths are not meaningful enough:
** /cartridge/tenan
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Thanks everyone for quick ack!
>
> If this is the expected behavior, then no problem. But as Lakmal mentioned
> property name is confusing.
> autoIpAssign=false gives an impression that Stratos will not assign IP.
> But it is actually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14217850#comment-14217850
]
Udara Liyanage commented on STRATOS-989:
Hi Mari,
Resource URL of the Stratos AP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14217849#comment-14217849
]
Udara Liyanage commented on STRATOS-989:
Hi Mari,
Resource URL of the Stratos AP
Hi Mari,
Resource URL of the Stratos API is to be re factored. Those things will be
fixed there. I created the jira STRATOS-982 to track this.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Mariangela Hills (JIRA)
wrote:
> Mariangela Hills created STRATOS-989:
>
>
>
Udara Liyanage created STRATOS-991:
--
Summary: Refactor Stratos API URLs
Key: STRATOS-991
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-991
Project: Stratos
Issue Type: Bug
R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mariangela Hills updated STRATOS-971:
-
Description:
There is inconsistency in coding comments. For example in {application_id} i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14217831#comment-14217831
]
Udara Liyanage commented on STRATOS-990:
Hi Mari,
Thanks for pointing this out.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14217828#comment-14217828
]
Udara Liyanage commented on STRATOS-990:
Hi Mari,
Thanks for pointing this out.
Hi Mari,
Thanks for pointing this out. The CLI commands which uses this is too
deprecated. I will remove this.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Mariangela Hills (JIRA)
wrote:
> Mariangela Hills created STRATOS-990:
>
>
> Summary: Remove meth
Mariangela Hills created STRATOS-990:
Summary: Remove method for list of subscribed cartridges
Key: STRATOS-990
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-990
Project: Stratos
Iss
Hi,
Below is the flow which is discussed so far.
1) User/tenant deploys and aplication id=appId
2) SM calls IS and creates an oAuth APP which will return consumer key and
consumer secret
3) SM again calls the IS with consumer keys, secrets and appid as the scope
4) IS generates a JWT token which
Mariangela Hills created STRATOS-989:
Summary: Some resource paths are not meaningful
Key: STRATOS-989
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-989
Project: Stratos
Issue Type:
Hi Imesh,
Any idea where is CloudStackIaas class?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> Hi Imesh,
>
> You have removed the CloudStackIaas class??
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=stratos.git;a=tree;f=components/org.apache.stratos.cloud.controller/src/main/java/org
Good idea Vishanth.. but this would be a time consuming task, isn't it? We
might need some volunteers :-)
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Vishanth Balasubramaniam <
vishan...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I believe these hangout sessions in youtube channel are really useful for
> everyone esp
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I understand that if we add a fixedIp in network interfaces section,
>> instance will get the fixed ip to the corresponding NIC.
>> "networkInt
Hi
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I understand that if we add a fixedIp in network interfaces section,
> instance will get the fixed ip to the corresponding NIC.
> "networkInterfaces":[ { "name":"net1-nonroutable", "networkUuid":"
> 84d52a6d-a9e5-
Hi Raj,
You could find some info https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-493
I ccied Martin and Jeffrey, they will probably be able to help you.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I understand that if we add a fixedIp in network interfaces section
Hi team,
I believe these hangout sessions in youtube channel are really useful for
everyone especially the starters to this community. But unfortunately some
of the earlier hangout video have poor audio.
So how about subtitles for those videos?
Here is a link for a do how -
https://www.youtube.c
Hi devs,
I understand that if we add a fixedIp in network interfaces section,
instance will get the fixed ip to the corresponding NIC.
"networkInterfaces":[ { "name":"net1-nonroutable", "networkUuid":"
84d52a6d-a9e5-472a-9935-a0e195fe5b4a", "fixedIp":"10.0.1.4", } ],
I also understand tha
Okay. Thanks a lot Nirmal. I will go through it too.
Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> By default, it is true, so you don't need it. But please read through the
> discussion I sent, I think we have to enable some setting in the Openstack
> server.
>
> On Wed, Nov
By default, it is true, so you don't need it. But please read through the
discussion I sent, I think we have to enable some setting in the Openstack
server.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> I didn't use this property. Do we have to set this also? Will try this out
>
Jeffrey faced the same issue sometime back and please read through
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stratos-dev/201405.mbox/%3ccf9128a8.25f12%25jeffr...@cisco.com%3e
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Yeah, I typed the wrong name here, but I am using
I didn't use this property. Do we have to set this also? Will try this out
with this property and let you know the results.
Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> We seem to have faced similar issue in Openstack.
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/stratos/commit/8102ac90
Yeah, I typed the wrong name here, but I am using the correct name in
cartridge definition. Sorry for the typo in $Subject.
Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> Raj, the property name should be 'autoAssignIp'
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
We seem to have faced similar issue in Openstack.
https://github.com/apache/stratos/commit/8102ac90f16e9e94f37b07f5a1ddbe5a87a8d0cd
Have you used blockUntilRunning property?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> Raj, the property name should be 'autoAssignIp'
>
> On Wed, N
Raj, the property name should be 'autoAssignIp'
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hi Nirmal,
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Nirmal Fernando
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam > > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> Documentati
Hi Nirmal,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Documentations[1] says if set autoIpAssign=true, public IP will be
>> assigned automatically. So it will be automatically assigned by strat
Thanks everyone for quick ack!
If this is the expected behavior, then no problem. But as Lakmal mentioned
property name is confusing.
autoIpAssign=false gives an impression that Stratos will not assign IP. But
it is actually other way around. Let see if we can find some good name, we
can change it
Mariangela Hills created STRATOS-988:
Summary: Typo in resource path - /subsscriptions/{application_id}
Key: STRATOS-988
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-988
Project: Stratos
I know this property is confusing. I think we should rename it. AFAIR what
is meant, when you are set to true of autoIPAssign, From stratos not
assigning any floating ip, let IaaS to handover to do what ever config in
IaaS. In this case, if IaaS config to auto assign floating IP, instance get
one,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Documentations[1] says if set autoIpAssign=true, public IP will be
> assigned automatically. So it will be automatically assigned by stratos?
>
Yes.
> My instances are not getting any public IPs.
>
Can you send the wso
Hi,
I guess the behavior is the expected behavior. autoIpAssign=true means IP
should be assigned from IAAS side, thus Stratos does not allocate any.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Documentations[1] says if set autoIpAssign=true, public IP will be
> as
Hi devs,
Documentations[1] says if set autoIpAssign=true, public IP will be assigned
automatically. So it will be automatically assigned by stratos? My
instances are not getting any public IPs. I went through the code base, and
I guess we are not doing anything if autoIpAssign=true.
So my underst
Hi,
I installed OAuth feature of WSO2 IS and was able to generate a token and
validate a token by invoking the admin services using SOAP UI. I will now
try to do the same with code at the time of application deployment.
Found several issues
We already use SSO feature, so newest oauth feature
Good job Chamila
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa
wrote:
> Please find the YouTube link at [1].
>
> [1]. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR_xQ1yecT8
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Chamila De Alwis
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The hangout will start in 15 minutes. Please join f
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Dakshika Jayathilaka
wrote:
> Ok, i'll change it to "Service Groups". Current rest endpoint include it
> as "group", then its better to rename as servicegroups. WDYT?
>
Wouldn't just 'group' be better?
> *Dakshika Jayathilaka*
> Software Engineer
> WSO2, Inc.
>
Ok, i'll change it to "Service Groups". Current rest endpoint include it as
"group", then its better to rename as servicegroups. WDYT?
*Dakshika Jayathilaka*
Software Engineer
WSO2, Inc.
lean.enterprise.middleware
0771100911
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
> Hi Dakshika,
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
