svn commit: r351901 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles: project.properties project.xml xdocs/navigation.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Fri Dec 2 22:46:56 2005 New Revision: 351901 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351901&view=rev Log: Build file and website updates. Modified: struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles/project.properties struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles/project.xml struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles/xdoc

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On 12/2/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In short, it builds a JAR with a timestamped version (like > struts-core-20051106.203359.jar) and then makes a copy of it with the > name struts-core-SNAPSHOT.jar So for my team, if we are depending on > a nightly build, we use the timestamped

Re: svn commit: r351883 - in /struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src/webapp/WEB-INF: entities/profile-open.xml entities/subscription-add-page.xml entities/subscription-add.xml webtest.xml

On 12/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351883&view=rev > Log: > WebTest.xml > * Add test against duplicate subscription hosts. > * Include reference to use case step in test descriptions. > * Include remaining tests as TODOs Thanks, Ted!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

svn commit: r351883 - in /struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src/webapp/WEB-INF: entities/profile-open.xml entities/subscription-add-page.xml entities/subscription-add.xml webtest.xml

Author: husted Date: Fri Dec 2 20:03:26 2005 New Revision: 351883 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351883&view=rev Log: WebTest.xml * Add test against duplicate subscription hosts. * Include reference to use case step in test descriptions. * Include remaining tests as TODOs Added:

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On 12/2/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is, using "maven jar:deploy-snapshot", you can build and deploy > a SNAPSHOT library independent of the in the POM. > Similarly with jar:install-snapshot, dist:deploy-snapshot, etc. > > In short, it builds a JAR with a timestamped version

svn commit: r351879 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles: build.properties.sample project.properties project.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Fri Dec 2 19:07:13 2005 New Revision: 351879 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351879&view=rev Log: Switch to SNAPSHOT version number, add dependency on the artifact plugin, and update properties for deploying to the Apache internal repo. Contributed by: Joe Germuska A

svn commit: r351877 - in /struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src/webapp: Registration.jsp WEB-INF/entities/profile-open.xml WEB-INF/webtest.properties.sample WEB-INF/webtest.xml subscription.jsp

Author: husted Date: Fri Dec 2 18:48:33 2005 New Revision: 351877 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351877&view=rev Log: * WebTests - Add "Maintain" test case and "Add" test. Added: struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src/webapp/WEB-INF/entities/profile-open.xml Modified: struts/apps/trun

svn commit: r351874 - /struts/site/trunk/DRAFTS.txt

Author: husted Date: Fri Dec 2 18:14:39 2005 New Revision: 351874 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351874&view=rev Log: Expand "today" into actual date. Modified: struts/site/trunk/DRAFTS.txt Modified: struts/site/trunk/DRAFTS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/site/trunk/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37717] - struts-el-1.2.8.jar invalid in apache repsitory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ApacheCon Announcements

On 12/2/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > They are starting to ask for drafts of any announcements we'd like to > make during ApacheCon. > > Does anyone have any suggestions for the current drafts? > > Here's my +1 for submitting these drafts to ApacheCon now. Others? +1 ... let's hop

Re: ApacheCon Announcements

They are starting to ask for drafts of any announcements we'd like to make during ApacheCon. Does anyone have any suggestions for the current drafts? Here's my +1 for submitting these drafts to ApacheCon now. Others? -Ted. On 12/2/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that we've had a

svn commit: r351873 - /struts/site/trunk/DRAFTS.txt

Author: husted Date: Fri Dec 2 17:43:18 2005 New Revision: 351873 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351873&view=rev Log: Typos. Modified: struts/site/trunk/DRAFTS.txt Modified: struts/site/trunk/DRAFTS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/site/trunk/DRAFTS.txt?rev=351873&r1=3

ApacheCon Announcements

Now that we've had a chance to discuss the proposal, I added a draft announcement regarding the proposed merger to the new "DRAFTS.txt" file under struts/current/site. Any thoughts or comments on any of the announcements? As it turns out, Patrick will be joining us on Tuesday. -Ted. --

Re: [VOTE] Confirm Shale 1.0.0 Test Build Release Plan

On 12/2/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 for the plan, but with the following comment on the release plan > dependencies: > > The release plan is showing Commons Validator 1.1.4 - but the > website/build.xml has Validator 1.2.0. Also looking at the build.xml, the > dependency d

svn commit: r351793 - /struts/site/trunk/DRAFTS.txt

Author: husted Date: Fri Dec 2 10:23:21 2005 New Revision: 351793 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351793&view=rev Log: * Add draft announcement regarding the proposed WebWork merger. Modified: struts/site/trunk/DRAFTS.txt Modified: struts/site/trunk/DRAFTS.txt URL: http://svn.apache

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On 12/2/05, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 2, 2005, at 12:06 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > > > People can then declare a dependency on a particular timestamped > > snapshot, or on -SNAPSHOT in which case Maven will use the latest > > version. > > > > Is this what you want to do for

Re: svn commit: r351781 - in /struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src: java/org/apache/struts/apps/mailreader/resources/ApplicationResources.properties webapp/Registration.jsp webapp/WEB-INF/entities/registe

On 12/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: husted > Date: Fri Dec 2 09:52:55 2005 > New Revision: 351781 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351781&view=rev > Log: > * Registration.jsp - Give submit and reset buttons names so that they can be > invoked by automatic

svn commit: r351781 - in /struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src: java/org/apache/struts/apps/mailreader/resources/ApplicationResources.properties webapp/Registration.jsp webapp/WEB-INF/entities/register-he

Author: husted Date: Fri Dec 2 09:52:55 2005 New Revision: 351781 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351781&view=rev Log: * Registration.jsp - Give submit and reset buttons names so that they can be invoked by automatic tests. Modified: struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src/java/org/apache

Re: Milestones proposal: Step 1 (revised)

On 12/2/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/1/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Step 2: > > - Move closed tickets included in soon-to-be-released projects to > their > > milestone. > > - Wade through TBD tickets and assign to milestones > > > > While I like Martin's i

Re: Milestones proposal: Step 1 (revised)

I'll mention how we do it in case it sparks inspiration... We use Jira to manage issues for several software configurations and packages. Because of our odd agile process, we never really know when we're going to cut a release (which is sort of similar to you guys but we're more customer driv

Why not JIRA and Confluence (was Re: Tough Questions )

On 12/1/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not so sure. Much as I like JIRA, the ASF JIRA installation is > vulnerable. It is effectively supported only by Jeff Turner, who works for > Atlassian. We are dependent on him - and the fact that he works for > Atlassian - for fixes, maint

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On 12/1/05, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have just checked in a sweeping refactoring of the Standalone Tiles > codebase. Many may see it and immediately hurl cruise missiles in my > general direction :-) Please do, I can take it. First and foremost > however, I ask that you remem

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37717] - struts-el-1.2.8.jar invalid in apache repsitory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37741] - [Standalone Tiles] TilesServlet does not load all servlet parameters

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

On Dec 2, 2005, at 12:06 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: People can then declare a dependency on a particular timestamped snapshot, or on -SNAPSHOT in which case Maven will use the latest version. Is this what you want to do for Stand-alone Tiles? I think this would be great. The main goal for me is

Re: [VOTE] Confirm Shale 1.0.0 Test Build Release Plan

On 12/2/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also looking at the build.xml, the > dependency download also includes three Commons components not mentioned on > the website or in the release plan (Codec 1.2, Collections 3.0 and > FileUpload 1.0). Those three are for MyFaces: http://

Re: [VOTE] Confirm Shale 1.0.0 Test Build Release Plan

+1 -- Git 'r dun! -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance 678.910.8017 - Original Message - From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 5:02 PM Subject: [VOTE] Confi

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Major Refactoring (Long)

At 11:06 PM -0700 12/1/05, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 12/1/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we could publish nightly (or intermittent) snapshots to the Apache repository (http://cvs.apache.org/repository/) I think that the hope is to avoid people treating it like an ibiblio mi

Re: Milestones proposal: Step 1 (revised)

At 7:33 AM -0500 12/2/05, Ted Husted wrote: On my own project, we now require that all commits reference an issue ticket. Is that what we're going for here? This seems like a lot of overhead; just thinking back to when I was heavily developing the ActionContext and related features for the C

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

Re: Milestones proposal: Step 1 (revised)

On 12/1/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Step 2: > - Move closed tickets included in soon-to-be-released projects to their > milestone. > - Wade through TBD tickets and assign to milestones > > While I like Martin's idea of only putting tickets to milestones when someone > commits to

Re: Milestones proposal: Step 1 (revised)

On my own project, we now require that all commits reference an issue ticket. Is that what we're going for here? If I'm working on WebTests for the MailReader, should I create a ticket for that, so I can reference it in the commits? It's been suggested that we have tickets for everything before,

svn commit: r351699 [1/3] - in /struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src/webapp: ./ WEB-INF/ WEB-INF/entities/

Author: husted Date: Fri Dec 2 04:29:34 2005 New Revision: 351699 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351699&view=rev Log: * Extend MailReader webtests. ** The test to add a new registered user is still under development. We need to name the button so that the test can click it. Added:

svn commit: r351699 [3/3] - in /struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src/webapp: ./ WEB-INF/ WEB-INF/entities/

Modified: struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src/webapp/WEB-INF/entities/config-debug.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/apps/trunk/mailreader/src/webapp/WEB-INF/entities/config-debug.xml?rev=351699&r1=351698&r2=351699&view=diff ===

Re: [VOTE] Confirm Shale 1.0.0 Test Build Release Plan

+1 for the plan, but with the following comment on the release plan dependencies: The release plan is showing Commons Validator 1.1.4 - but the website/build.xml has Validator 1.2.0. Also looking at the build.xml, the dependency download also includes three Commons components not mentioned on the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37751] New: - The generated Html content by JasperReports(v.1.0.3) would be truncated under Struts?!

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu