On 3/21/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/21/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387707&view=rev
>
> > Are you not seeing the javadocs (as well as the sources) for the sample
> apps
> > in the main (shale-framework-x.{
On 3/21/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387707&view=rev
> Are you not seeing the javadocs (as well as the sources) for the sample apps
> in the main (shale-framework-x.{tar.gz,zip}) artifacts? The intent was
> that just the binaries
Author: husted
Date: Tue Mar 21 21:05:41 2006
New Revision: 387725
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387725&view=rev
Log:
Action2 Apps
* Mailreader - Work in progress
** Switch from "model driven" to POJOs to work around DAO quirks.
Modified:
struts/sandbox/trunk/action2/apps/mailreader
On 3/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Author: wsmoak
> Date: Tue Mar 21 20:06:04 2006
> New Revision: 387707
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387707&view=rev
> Log:
> Adapted Craig's 20060124 announcement of the nightly build reorganization,
> for the release notes.
Better late than never...
On 3/16/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Struts 1.2.9 test build has been available for a week now. Once you
> have
> had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please
> respond
> to the following vote.
>
>
On 3/21/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/21/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 21, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
> >
> > > I suppose that the choice of the context object could favor action
> > > versus shale for a test framework.
> > >
>
This is a question for the Struts User list. The Struts Dev list is for
discussion of the development of Struts itself.
My first guess would be that you are not putting all of your application's
jar files in your WEB-INF/lib directory. If that doesn't solve your problem,
please ask on the User lis
Author: wsmoak
Date: Tue Mar 21 20:06:04 2006
New Revision: 387707
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387707&view=rev
Log:
Adapted Craig's 20060124 announcement of the nightly build reorganization, for
the release notes.
Added information about shale-dependencies and shale-starter, and moved
Author: wsmoak
Date: Tue Mar 21 19:12:27 2006
New Revision: 387696
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387696&view=rev
Log:
Remove the link to the webapps directory, which is not included in the
distribution.
Add a link to the SQL Browser API docs.
Modified:
struts/shale/trunk/docs/releas
On 3/21/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I didn't mean to discourage you -- in fact I offered to help. :)
> My comment was qualified with 'from a release manager perspective'.
> Obviously, it's easier to package and verify a release for a single
> jar than several of them plus examp
On 3/21/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I didn't mean to come across as confrontational as I'm still
> mulling it around in my own mind. Perhaps we
> should put off any major decision like this until Action 2 has been going for
> several weeks (svn cutover is tomorrow).
>
On 3/21/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
>
> > I suppose that the choice of the context object could favor action
> > versus shale for a test framework.
> >
> > Since I'm in the JSF fan club, I'd argue that we could implement
> > the
Hi all,
I wrote a simple struts application and when I try to
deploy in weblogic 8.1, it gives the following error:
"Servlet class org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet
for servlet ActionServlet could not be handled by the
classloader with classpath: ". At the end it printed
out the big classpath
>From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
>
> > I suppose that the choice of the context object could favor action
> > versus shale for a test framework.
> >
> > Since I'm in the JSF fan club, I'd argue that we could implement
> > the Ext
On Mar 21, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
I suppose that the choice of the context object could favor action
versus shale for a test framework.
Since I'm in the JSF fan club, I'd argue that we could implement
the ExternalContext interface since the JSF API will soon be a given.
I
>From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
>
> > I wonder if the shale test framework can be leveraged here. There
> > are mock objects for the servlet API.
>
> I need to take a closer look at that. I'm using Struts Test Case in
> a few pl
I guess it is good to summarize the possible options
everyone has mentioned with regards to distributions:
1. Individual libraries with independent versioning.
2. Individual libraries with single versioning.
3. Action (action+taglib) and Extras libraries only, (independent versioning?).
4. Single
On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
I wonder if the shale test framework can be leveraged here. There
are mock objects for the servlet API.
I need to take a closer look at that. I'm using Struts Test Case in
a few places in Standalone Tiles already.
2) moving on to Miles
Oh, sorry, I didn't mean to come across as confrontational as I'm still mulling it around in my own mind. Perhaps we
should put off any major decision like this until Action 2 has been going for several weeks (svn cutover is tomorrow).
Then, we may have a better idea of who will be working on it
On 3/21/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The burden of proof, so to speak, should be on separate releases, not
> consolidation.
:) No one is arguing with you, Don. :) All anyone said is that we
didn't take the separate releases idea far enough to "prove" anything
one way or the other. I
On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Don Brown wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
Looking at the list again, struts-tiles is missing. And I'm not sure
how Faces is going to fit in there, it has a different set of
dependencies than the others. That will all sort itself out when you
start moving things around
When you released 1.3.1, did you just roll Action or did you create a release for each module? If only action, does
that mean the rest are still at 1.3.0? Frank's idea of a compatibility table, in my mind, shows how potentially ugly
this can become.
Still, if there was a group of Struts commi
On 3/20/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - There are a couple of 'xdocs/navigation.xml' files that could be
> > > excluded from the distribution.
> >
> Just to clarify, omitting these from the distribution would mean you
> couldn't create the website from the source artifact,
>From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I've just checked in the last taglib refactoring work that I can
> think of. That turned out to be a much smaller chunk of work than I
> had thought. If you're following the wiki page[1] that means
> Milestone 2 in the 4-step process to release is larg
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by JasonBillingsley:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsWebLinks
--
I've just checked in the last taglib refactoring work that I can
think of. That turned out to be a much smaller chunk of work than I
had thought. If you're following the wiki page[1] that means
Milestone 2 in the 4-step process to release is largely complete.
There's one remaining gaping
>From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 3/21/06, Gary VanMatre wrote:
> >
> > >From: "Wendy Smoak"
> > >
> > > On 3/20/06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Sorry for the late response and the bad news ... -1 on this because
> > the
> > > > > sql-browser sample is not inclu
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by GregReddin:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StandaloneTiles
The comment on the change is:
Added status to taglib refactoring table.
---
Author: greddin
Date: Tue Mar 21 10:06:42 2006
New Revision: 387594
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387594&view=rev
Log:
Ticket #38252. Fixed processObjectValue and processTypedAttribute methods.
Modified:
struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles/src/java/org/apache/tiles/taglib/InsertTag.java
Modi
On 3/21/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > On 3/20/06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sorry for the late response and the bad news ... -1 on this because
> the
> > > > sql-browser sample is not included in the shale-framework-1.0
>From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 3/20/06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry for the late response and the bad news ... -1 on this because the
> > > sql-browser sample is not included in the shale-framework-1.0.1 artifact,
> > > and running "ant download-dependencies releas
Author: husted
Date: Tue Mar 21 05:21:47 2006
New Revision: 387521
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387521&view=rev
Log:
Action2 Apps
* Mailreader - Work in progress
** Add classes missing from prior commits
** Add validation for Registration action
** Enable client-side validation
** Upda
32 matches
Mail list logo
