>
> WebWork has a Jasper result[1]. It was not
> transitioned to Struts
> Action 2 because of the licensing issue. The code
> should be readily
> adaptable for those who want to use it, and perhaps
> it could be kept
> alive either as part of Jasper Reports' development,
> or in a
> SourceFor
On 6/6/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/6/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin Cooper wrote:
> > No. FOP = whatever. I consider anything --> PDF to be out of scope /
too
> > specialised here.
>
> Ah, ok, gotcha, I understand now :)
>
> PDF generation is a
Martin Cooper wrote:
I
don't see PDF generation, *assuming it's a somewhat limited capability*,
to be too specialized.
I do. Sorry, but it's just not in the same league as other much more common
cases.
Well, as compared to SSO, LDAP, persistence, etc., I would agree :) But
as compared to
On 6/6/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
> No. FOP = whatever. I consider anything --> PDF to be out of scope / too
> specialised here.
Ah, ok, gotcha, I understand now :)
PDF generation is a fairly common thing to do from a webapp though, no?
No, not rea
On 6/6/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/6/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 6/6/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Martin Cooper wrote:
> > > I agree that this doesn't sound like something that should happen
> here.
> >
> > Your saying
Martin Cooper wrote:
No. FOP = whatever. I consider anything --> PDF to be out of scope / too
specialised here.
Ah, ok, gotcha, I understand now :)
PDF generation is a fairly common thing to do from a webapp though, no?
I know I've had to do it plenty... WW has always been, from what I've
s
On 6/6/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/6/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin Cooper wrote:
> > I agree that this doesn't sound like something that should happen
here.
>
> Your saying that in terms of the custom XML wrapper around
> iText/PDFBox/whatever,
On 6/6/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
> I agree that this doesn't sound like something that should happen here.
Your saying that in terms of the custom XML wrapper around
iText/PDFBox/whatever, right?
Yes.
I.e., going the FOP direction is a
different
Martin Cooper wrote:
I agree that this doesn't sound like something that should happen here.
Your saying that in terms of the custom XML wrapper around
iText/PDFBox/whatever, right? I.e., going the FOP direction is a
different story, right? I do agree, even though I've already done it
once
On 6/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Final refinement ... perform this copy in process-resources phase, which is
more logical. It works because the plugin goals are added on to the end of
the existing goals for a phase (the standard resource copying has to occur
first for this
On 6/5/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 3:38 PM -0400 6/5/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>Not a bad idea... I've never been a big fan of XSLT, always seemed overly
>difficult to me for what it was, but certainly sticking with a standard
>has appeal, and I've done a little bit of FOP
On 6/6/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a recommended practice for testing out my JSP Tag classes?
Is this even desirable? I'm thinking that its nice to verify that
values and value bindings are being set properly. Maybe we could add
something to shale-test that could com
On 6/6/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been lucky find a solution, but it took a bit of playing around. The
key problem I was having was making sure that:
1) the tests were in src/it were compiled in addition to src/test
2) the integration tests were not executed during tes
> I haven't been successful at getting Surefire to run during
> integration-test instead of test, but I have a couple of
> questions out on [EMAIL PROTECTED] looking for ideas.
I've been lucky find a solution, but it took a bit of playing around. The
key problem I was having was making sure th
Is there a recommended practice for testing out my JSP Tag classes?
Is this even desirable? I'm thinking that its nice to verify that
values and value bindings are being set properly. Maybe we could add
something to shale-test that could combine the mock stuff with a real
tag?
I'm still working
On 6/5/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem I keep running into is that there is only one
/, and there is no
// in the model. If that
existed, it seems like you could get another execution of Surefire
using a second source directory.
Returning to the idea of best practices a
On 6/5/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 06/06/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maven2 needs to support integration testing as a first class notion in
the
> architecture of what you envision a "project" to be.
It may not have been clear enough, but that's exactly w
Joe, was there anything else along these lines that wasn't transitioned
for this (or any other) reason? I'm wondering if a subproject at
http://struts.sourceforge.net might be in order for such "orphans"?
Frank
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 8:39 AM +0200 6/6/06, Juan Ara wrote:
JasperReports (http:
At 8:39 AM +0200 6/6/06, Juan Ara wrote:
JasperReports (http://jasperreports.sourceforge.net) is an xml
schema for iText, in a similar (but I think far more extensive and
complex than yours). It handles XML files, turns them into iText
code and the you pass a DataSource interface to fill the fi
2006/6/6, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 6/3/06, Erik Bertelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tweaked my build scripts a little and now successfully upgraded
a
> handfull of Struts Action applications from 1.3.0 to 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT /
> (appears to be built on 29 May 2006).
> Seems to
I don't know if I'll have time to look at the patch today, but I'll
get to it ASAP. See one comment below:
On Jun 6, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
But I think that most of the time addDefinitions() will be called
at servlet init time and many of the components in TilesContext
On 6/3/06, Erik Bertelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have tweaked my build scripts a little and now successfully upgraded a
handfull of Struts Action applications from 1.3.0 to 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT /
(appears to be built on 29 May 2006).
Seems to work well and as the distribution's contents
has cha
Hi Greg sorry for being late but I had to work hard yesterday afternoon.
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
Are you talking about readDefinitions(), addDefinitions(), etc. Could
you post the changes you made to DefinitionsFactory and
UrlDefinitionsFactory? I think that would give me a better idea of
th
On 6/5/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, I think your right about that too. PDFBox looks interesting...
although I'm not sure I want to build against something that hasn't had
a 1.0 release yet (hehe, JWP excepted of course!! LOL)
I wouldn't be concerned about that. After
24 matches
Mail list logo
