Archetype version numbers

2006-08-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
I've been thinking about archetype version numbers lately. I'd like to release a 'blank' archetype for the 1.2 branch in addition to the one for 1.3. To avoid confusion, I'm going to change the version number on the archetypes to match the Struts version number they are intended to work with. T

Re: [s2] Convention over Configuration (was Validation)

2006-08-03 Thread Jason Carreira
If it looks like the stuff Don was showing before, then it's looking too complex. Either explicit configuration or easy but rigid conventions... not configurable conventions ;-) - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensympho

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Jason Carreira
> I think you missed the main point I was trying to > make, which is that the concepts of multiple stacks > is something I avoid entirely. Instead, I believe in > one stack that is capable of providing different > behaviors based on conventions. No, I understood that... I just don't agree. ---

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Patrick Lightbody
I think you missed the main point I was trying to make, which is that the concepts of multiple stacks is something I avoid entirely. Instead, I believe in one stack that is capable of providing different behaviors based on conventions.

RE: Problem with Struts-html.tld when deployed on weblogic

2006-08-03 Thread Karr, David
Ask this on the struts-user list (sorry if I missed it there). > -Original Message- > From: user123 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:35 PM > To: dev@struts.apache.org > Subject: Problem with Struts-html.tld when deployed on weblogic > > I have a struts fram

Re: [s2] Convention over Configuration (was Validation)

2006-08-03 Thread Patrick Lightbody
Don and I talked in-depth about using wildcards to do the style of conventions I am talking about, and we found that it would require a much more complex implementation of wildcards. Don, can you add to that? - Posted via Jive Fo

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Jason Carreira
Either way, you're still talking about multiple aliases for one class, which is what Ted was saying we should deprecate. For how it's done... Well, I hate the "!" notation... We've had to jump through a lot of hoops to support it and it still bites us every now and again. Plus, it's just a sec

Re: Where's Waldo?

2006-08-03 Thread Ted Husted
I'll be away until August 8, and probably without an Internet connection (but with a fully loaded laptop). -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [s2] Convention over Configuration (was Validation)

2006-08-03 Thread Ted Husted
On 8/3/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ted, Don: what would you guys do in the scenario Jason provided? I think if we focus on using wildcard patterns to define the better part of convention-over-configuration, then people can use whatever patterns work best in a given applicat

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Patrick Lightbody
OK, I think I see where you are coming from. I guess we are coming across a difference of opinion, but let me explain how I would do the exact same thing: - Like you, I would have a single action class that has multiple methods to invoke (input, save, list, whatever) - I would not, however, h

Problem with Struts-html.tld when deployed on weblogic

2006-08-03 Thread user123
I have a struts framework set up for my application. I tested it deploying on JBoss4,it worked fine. Now i try to deploy on Weblogic but i'm getting the following error. /jsp/abc/abc.jsp(5): Error in using tag library uri='/tags/struts-html' prefix='html': The Tag class 'org.apache.struts.taglib

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Jason Carreira
> Jason, I have to disagree with you on this. I've > written a lot of WebWork apps and multiple aliases is > rarely used (maybe 1-5% of the time for me). Perhaps > you can give the common examples you come across so > that we can understand your style better? > I think I posted this last week, bu

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Patrick Lightbody
Jason, I have to disagree with you on this. I've written a lot of WebWork apps and multiple aliases is rarely used (maybe 1-5% of the time for me). Perhaps you can give the common examples you come across so that we can understand your style better? > > I'm not suggesting that try to make it im

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Jason Carreira
> I'm not suggesting that try to make it impossible to > use multiple > alaises. But I am suggesting that the Struts 2 group > should recognize > that multiple aliases are not a recommended practice, > in the same way > that chaining actions are not a recommended practice. > I disagree. Multiple

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread tm jee
> In many Struts projects I worked on we deliberately modified the > functionality to use methods off the same class, and it was one of the > reasons that I liked webwork so much. I think it is elegant that you > can use one action class for all/most of the CRUD calls, and the > interceptors a

Re: Reg Struts-Shale

2006-08-03 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 8/3/06, Jeevan Kumar Kade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Is there is major differeence between Struts-Shale framework and JSF. Please, categorize and differentiate on this. Shale has moved to its own top level Apache project with its own mailing lists[1] ... this would be a good questi

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Ian Roughley
Ted Husted wrote: On 8/3/06, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is actually a feature that I like in WW/SAF, granted som times is makes more sense to use it than others, but that is always going to be a design decision. Can you further explain why you have come to the conclusion that

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Ted Husted
On 8/3/06, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is actually a feature that I like in WW/SAF, granted som times is makes more sense to use it than others, but that is always going to be a design decision. Can you further explain why you have come to the conclusion that they are not good p

Problem in Mask Rule of Struts Validator for Different Languages

2006-08-03 Thread Mahesh More
Hi , I am using Struts validator and mask rule for Validating my Fields like : mask ^\w+$ minlength

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Jason Carreira
> On 8/2/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Patrick and I talked about doing that, however, we > came up against several > > roadblocks: > > > > 1. How would you handle nested packages? For > example: /foo/bar/joe? > > Do we need to handle nested packages? Yes. > > > > 2. How wo

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Jason Carreira
> The modifiers could solve problems 3 and maybe 1 > ("com.acme.{1|slashesToDots}.{2|capitalize}"), and > perhaps #2 could be solved by > using the "!" separator instead of the "/" again. > > However, the question must be raised whether these > improvements obscure the > somewhat advanced wildc

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Jason Carreira
> I would think an ideal application would have the > following: > > - zero configuration (using conventions instead) for > actions and results > - overrides possible in struts.xml, including > wildcards > - result overrides via annotations if struts.xml is > too verbose > - annotations for valida

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Jason Carreira
> Ted, > Good questions. Related to that - why is it than i18n > resource bundles are tied to the action class rather > than the _view_ (the view would tend to make more > sense, I believe). In practice I've found it makes more sense to keep them at a higher level... we keep one resource bundle p

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Jason Carreira
-1 on giving too many options. The validation framework gives a way to do validations. You can also code your validations in Java, or build your own hooks into any other validation framework through interceptors. Remember, while it seems nice to let people choose from an array of options for

Re: [s2] Validation

2006-08-03 Thread Ian Roughley
Ted Husted wrote: On 8/2/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Patrick and I talked about doing that, however, we came up against several roadblocks: 1. How would you handle nested packages? For example: /foo/bar/joe? Do we need to handle nested packages? In webwork I make use of ne

Re: sturts-shale

2006-08-03 Thread Ted Husted
The Shale framework is now a top-level ASF project. * http://shale.apache.org/ -Ted. On 8/3/06, Jeevan Kumar Kade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Is there is major differeence between Struts-Shale framework and JSF. Please, categorize and differentiate on this. Thanks in Advance Jeevan

Re: form validation

2006-08-03 Thread Ted Husted
The best place to post a question like this is the Struts User list, where there are more people to help and the answers are archived. * http://struts.apache.org/mail.html -- HTH, Ted. * http://www.husted.com/struts/ On 8/3/06, tamil selvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: how to validate the addre

[ANN] JAVAWUG : WebWork in Action "The Lost MiniDV" Patrick Lightbody BAY CHI

2006-08-03 Thread Peter . Pilgrim
Hi I have recently recovered a MiniDV tape of Patrick Lightbody's presentation of ``WebWork / Struts 2.0 in Action'' at VeriSign's Mountain View office. I thought I had lost that first hour of tape on my travels to northern California, but I found it in the suitcase comparant, and then digitise

form validation

2006-08-03 Thread tamil selvan
how to validate the address fields in struts framework? - How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

sturts-shale

2006-08-03 Thread Jeevan Kumar Kade
Hi, Is there is major differeence between Struts-Shale framework and JSF. Please, categorize and differentiate on this. Thanks in Advance Jeevan Kumar __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

Reg Struts-Shale

2006-08-03 Thread Jeevan Kumar Kade
Hi, Is there is major differeence between Struts-Shale framework and JSF. Please, categorize and differentiate on this. Thanks in Advance Jeevan Kumar __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around