On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5
[X] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality.
[ ] +/- 0
[ ] -1 No, let it remain Beta quality
--
Wendy
---
Now that Struts 1.3.5 has been available as a Beta release [1] for
almost a month, I think it's time to consider promoting it to GA
quality.
As I mentioned in a status report [2], we've seen reports of apps
being upgraded to 1.3.5 with no problems, some questions on the user
list, and some update
Oh finally the long awaited recognition ;-)
On 9/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see. You're just selecting which JSP to display with the action
forward, not changing the flow of the application. Is that right?
In that case, I can see some advantage over using Tiles.
>
Correct.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see. You're just selecting which JSP to display with the action
forward, not changing the flow of the application. Is that right?
In that case, I can see some advantage over using Tiles.
I see. You're just selecting which JSP to display with the action
forward, not changing the flow of the application. Is that right?
In that case, I can see some advantage over using Tiles.
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Benedict [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Benedict
George, the action can choose which forward to return. You were asking
if it, for example, always goes to "success"? No, it doesn't have to; it
can choose the view via the forward.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, in that context including an action as a block is very much like
including a tile
Right, in that context including an action as a block is very much like
including a tile with an associated tile controller. The action then
just puts data into scope for the JSP to display.
What I didn't understand was, "It can also decide the flow of display by
selecting the appropriate forward
This topic NOT about chaining (Paul, I am very sorry to bring the chaining up).
What Paul talks about is including an action URL into a JSP page.
Consider a Model 1 application, JSP page can dynamically include other
resources with or with . Now consider that a
JSP page includes a Struts action
On 9/12/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To accommodate nesting, I moved the URL
generating code from doStartTag() to doEndTag(). I don't know if this is
related, but I noticed that one property is not being cleaned up from
one instance to the next; that if I successively generated
If you're chaining actions for different blocks of the display, how do
you handle disagreements between the appropriate forward of one block
vs. another? This seems problematic, to me.
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Benedict [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Benedict
> Sen
By performing an "action", it is getting data from a service. It can
also decide the flow of display by selecting the appropriate forward.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coming in very late, here, but I just wanted clarification. It sounds
to me as if you're using actions like a tile controller. In
Apache Wiki ha scritto:
The following page has been changed by James:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/cheap_web_hosting
It seems like a spam...
New page:
[http://www.webhosting.uk.com/ Web Hosting UK]- cheap & affordable webhosting
services in uk.
Webhosting is a Professional UK web hosting
Coming in very late, here, but I just wanted clarification. It sounds
to me as if you're using actions like a tile controller. In other
words, it's not performing any "action" or deciding the flow of display,
but merely gathering data and putting it into scope for display. Is
that a correct desc
On 9/13/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For 2.0.0, I think we should just go with the latter. It's only an
example application, after all.
Not that I'm volunteering, but would having a set of Maven archetypes
for the different porlet containers make sense?
I think one archetype, whi
On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/13/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it is a simple copy task... Create the struts-portlet.war as usual
> (mvn -Papps) and copy the contents
> of apps/portlet/src/main/etc// into the war's WEB-
> INF directory...
>
> That's a
On 9/13/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it is a simple copy task... Create the struts-portlet.war as usual
(mvn -Papps) and copy the contents
of apps/portlet/src/main/etc// into the war's WEB-
INF directory...
That's all to be done for the specific wars.
It looks like we suppor
What do you think?
I'll change the POM for the portlet apps to include those
configuration files in the WAR,
so that people can extract the WAR and make the change in place, and
update the README.txt
Is anyone testing the various portlet containers? Do we want to make
one the default?
-Ted.
On 9/13/06, ashishabrol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I write these two in Struts -
...
Please ask this type of question on the user list instead:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
Thanks,
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
Ted,
it is a simple copy task... Create the struts-portlet.war as usual
(mvn -Papps) and copy the contents
of apps/portlet/src/main/etc// into the war's WEB-
INF directory...
That's all to be done for the specific wars.
I just ported over all of the issues fixed in WW 2.2.3/2.2.4 (not
Tob
How do I write these two in Struts -
<%
if(session.getAttribute("username") != null ||
request.getAttribute("pageno") != null) {
//do something
}
String s1 = request.getParameter("pageno");
String s2 = request.getAttribute("pageno");
%>
Is it something that we could fix by hand? Could you send me a
modified WAR that I could drop into the distribution? We are already
making adjustments for the docs, so the distribution is not 100%
automatic. (But still very close.)
I think we are otherwise good to go, and we could base 2.0.0 on
r
Ted,
WW-1407 is fixed. However, the war is not running out of the box within a
portal server. There needs to be kind of portal server specific config
file assembly.
I am not yet used to maven and its goals to implement this quickly, so I
postponed this for 2.0.1 (see WW-1435 for details).
We migh
22 matches
Mail list logo
