Re: CODE FREEZE: No more commits until the builds are fixed

2007-03-12 Thread Don Brown
Horray, we have a Green build for trunk. I neatly sidestepped the annotations issue and deployed the 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT, then fixed the tests for the blank webapp. The problem is when we fixed the inconsistent naming of result types, we removed the deprecated ones. Shouldn't we leave them in for at

Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status

2007-03-12 Thread tm jee
Sounds cool Ted, marked as "fix for fure". Cheers. Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We could just change the "Fix For" to future, in case someone wants to try later. Ted. On 3/12/07, tm jee wrote: > Hi guys, > > > OK, we've now cleared out all the 2.0.7 patches from last week, save > >

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build 220 was SUCCESSFUL (with 647 tests). Change made by husted and Don Brown

2007-03-12 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build has the following 2 changes by 2 authors: *husted* made the following changes at 10:28 PM, 12 March 2007 Comment: WW-18O4 "Showcase - view source throws NumberFormatException". The problem is that config parameter on the URL is empty (config=). It can be fix

Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status

2007-03-12 Thread Ted Husted
We could just change the "Fix For" to future, in case someone wants to try later. Ted. On 3/12/07, tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi guys, > OK, we've now cleared out all the 2.0.7 patches from last week, save > one that might still be sitting on Toby's hard drive :) The jira issue for th

Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status

2007-03-12 Thread tm jee
forgotten to mention that the code is already in WebWork svn together with documentation and a showcase example. Details could be found in the jira issue itself. cheers tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi guys, > OK, we've now cleared out all the 2.0.7 patches from last week, save > one tha

Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status

2007-03-12 Thread tm jee
Hi guys, > OK, we've now cleared out all the 2.0.7 patches from last week, save > one that might still be sitting on Toby's hard drive :) The jira issue for this is at [1]. Would it be possible to not migrate this to Struts2, cause I am not really sure how to make it a plugin (part of the code

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build 219 has FAILED (3 tests failed, no failures were new)

2007-03-12 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
This is an initial or manual build of the Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build. --- The build has 3 failed tests and 617 successful tests. Click http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/STRUTS-MAIN-219 to find ou

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build 218 has FAILED (3 tests failed, no failures were new). Change made by husted

2007-03-12 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build has the following 1 change by 1 author: *husted* made the following changes at 10:13 PM, 12 March 2007 Comment: WW-1526 "Error with handling static resources under WebSphere 6". Flush output after copy to appease WebLogic and possibly other containers. Submi

Re: CODE FREEZE: No more commits until the builds are fixed

2007-03-12 Thread James Mitchell
Based on this log... http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/build/viewBuildLog.action? buildKey=STRUTS-MAIN&buildNumber=216 s2/core requires struts-annotations-1.0-SNAPSHOT, which is on the maven repo, but plugins/dojo requires 1.0.2 snapshot. Unless someone pushes the 1.0.2 snapshot to the

Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status

2007-03-12 Thread Ted Husted
OK, we've now cleared out all the 2.0.7 patches from last week, save one that might still be sitting on Toby's hard drive :) Unfortunately, I won't be able to run through the release gauntlet tonight, and the rest of the week is booked. If someone else is up for rolling 2.0.7, please, feel free.

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build 217 has FAILED (3 tests failed, no failures were new). Change made by husted

2007-03-12 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build has the following 1 change by 1 author: *husted* made the following changes at 09:31 PM, 12 March 2007 Comment: WW-1787 "Token session interceptor faiing with redirect-action" Apply patch based on WebWork #1404. > /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/java/or

Re: CODE FREEZE: No more commits until the builds are fixed

2007-03-12 Thread Ted Husted
The head has a dependency on the Struts Annotation snapshot, but Bamboo doesn't know how to build that. -T. On 3/12/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bamboo is back up, but it seems recent commits have resulted in a failed build for trunk. Interestingly, 2.0.x is green. Ted, any chance

Re: How to publish s1?

2007-03-12 Thread Paul Benedict
I deleted struts-current* from dist/struts Wendy Smoak wrote: On 3/11/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now we are specifically being told to *not* create symbolic links! In fact, the instructions seem to indicate that the 'current' links probably shouldn't be created any more.

Re: CODE FREEZE: No more commits until the builds are fixed

2007-03-12 Thread Don Brown
Bamboo is back up, but it seems recent commits have resulted in a failed build for trunk. Interestingly, 2.0.x is green. Ted, any chance one of your recent commits could be breaking those three tests? http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/STRUTS Don On 3/11/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROT

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build 216 has FAILED (3 tests failed, no failures were new)

2007-03-12 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
This is an initial or manual build of the Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build. --- The build has 3 failed tests and 617 successful tests. Click http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/STRUTS-MAIN-216 to find ou

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build 215 has FAILED (3 tests failed). Change made by Don Brown, wsmoak and husted

2007-03-12 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build has the following 9 changes by 3 authors: *Don Brown* made the following changes at 01:41 PM, 11 March 2007 Comment: Added back text provider config which broke a bunch of tests WW-1715 > /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/struts-default.xml (5169

Re: [s2] Build is still broken (was Struts 2.0.7 Status)

2007-03-12 Thread Ted Husted
Hey, thanks for the heads up! As it stands now, we can resolve the dependency issues locally by first building the "missing" snapshot dependencies. I'll try to post the snapshots later to make Bamboo happy. -Ted. On 3/12/07, Mark Chaimungkalanont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Folks, A bit of a n

Re: [s2] Build is still broken (was Struts 2.0.7 Status)

2007-03-12 Thread Mark Chaimungkalanont
Folks, A bit of a note on build failures on Bamboo. As it stands the Error Summary section shows all messages sent to system error, so if the *actual* error of a build is sent to system out, it would be included in the summary. This seems to be the case with the compilation plugin in Mave

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge Annotations and Archetype into the trunk for the 2.1.x series (was struts-annotations)

2007-03-12 Thread Musachy Barroso
Well, it isn't really specific to Struts in anyway, and we wrote it because there wasn't anything else to do the job (xdoclet needed to be patched If I remember right). At the end is not big deal, it is just 4 classes anyway :) musachy On 3/12/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge Annotations and Archetype into the trunk for the 2.1.x series (was struts-annotations)

2007-03-12 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/12/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What I really wish is that there was some external project doing this(which is supposed to be a fairly common task) so we wouldn't have to maintain it, but if we are going to keep it, I'd rather have it as part of the distribution. Why wo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge Annotations and Archetype into the trunk for the 2.1.x series (was struts-annotations)

2007-03-12 Thread Musachy Barroso
What I really wish is that there was some external project doing this(which is supposed to be a fairly common task) so we wouldn't have to maintain it, but if we are going to keep it, I'd rather have it as part of the distribution. musachy On 3/12/07, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge Annotations and Archetype into the trunk for the 2.1.x series (was struts-annotations)

2007-03-12 Thread James Mitchell
I'd prefer that it be part of the distribution. Having it separate just seems to add complexity to the build and I'm sure to the release process. Just my 2 cents. -- James Mitchell On Mar 12, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Ted Husted wrote: Under the Apache License, anyone who wanted to do that w

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge Annotations and Archetype into the trunk for the 2.1.x series (was struts-annotations)

2007-03-12 Thread Ted Husted
Under the Apache License, anyone who wanted to do that would be free to do so. It's just a matter of changing the product name, and following the other provisions of the license. But, that doesn't solve the problem, it just changes the venue. If there's anyone who is ready, willing, and able to r

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge Annotations and Archetype into the trunk for the 2.1.x series (was struts-annotations)

2007-03-12 Thread Musachy Barroso
After the changes I just added, I don't think annotations will change much from now on, if any. We could set it up somewhere else (googlecode?) and avoid both the subproject and the multiple release problems. musachy On 3/12/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/11/07, Ted Husted <