Hello !!!
My question is the following one:
Is it possible to configure Struts in a way that Struts do not send a
response by a forward (error handling) in the case of specific error but
therefore declares the operation as successful ?
Thanks for some help.
Regards,
Helge
--
View this messag
Paul Benedict wrote:
Dojo 0.4.3 is old :-) I didn't know that. No one wants to move it to 1.x or
wherever they are now?
Paul
Many have tried. In general, the effort doesn't justify the result.
ie. you put a lot of effort writing new templates and tags that
predominately wrap and constra
ExtJS is a big no-no in my book. To use it in a commercial project you
need to buy a license, which would put off a lot of commercial customers.
Personally I use YUI for two reasons;
1) It's easy to separate out and include only the parts I need in my
webapp so I don't end up with war bloat.
Dojo 0.4.3 is old :-) I didn't know that. No one wants to move it to 1.x or
wherever they are now?
Paul
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> As you could probably guess, I've had a lot of success with AjaxParts
> Taglib ;) I've also had a lot of succe
As you could probably guess, I've had a lot of success with AjaxParts
Taglib ;) I've also had a lot of success with Dojo, ExtJS,
ActiveWidgets, dHTMLx and my personal favorite, DWR (I've found that
DWR, plus best-of-breed widgets is all the "framework" I need, which is
why I haven't posted her
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Tue, 7/22/08, Bob Tiernay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I really don't see why even a taglib is even on the table.
>
> I think the issue was a "let's make some of this cool stuff really easy for
> the people that don'
--- On Tue, 7/22/08, Bob Tiernay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really don't see why even a taglib is even on the table.
I think the issue was a "let's make some of this cool stuff really easy for the
people that don't know JavaScript."
To steal the phrase: now you have two problems.
I'm not su
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Bob Tiernay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone really looked into a comparison between using a taglib vs. a raw
> javascript framework across these dimensions:
Hey, don't look at me - I gave up using server-side rendering years ago! ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
> Has anyone had good or bad experiences with tag-based libraries like these?
>
I used to maintain Ajax Tags, but I thought there were too many
frameworks already and gave it away :). I haven't used any of the
other ones.
musachy
--
Has anyone really looked into a comparison between using a taglib vs. a raw
javascript framework across these dimensions:
1. Performance (page load time / bandwidth) (think s:head across most pages)
2. Expressiveness
3. Unobtrusiveness
4. Maintainability
5. Understandability
6. Modularity
My ex
> What does anyone think about donating the dojo plugin to codehaus? I think
> it's a better idea than letting the code go stale. You could even try
> donating to the dojotoolkit project.
I am not sure what you mean by donating it to codehaus. If someone wants to
support the plugin he may do so u
That would be totally fine, but I doubt anyone would be interested in
Dojo 0.4.3 at this point.
musachy
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does anyone think about donating the dojo plugin to codehaus? I think
> it's a better idea than letting the code
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dojo seems to get the most lip service, but I've seen persistence
> reports that YUI has broader acceptance.
The thing is, it depends a whole lot on what you are doing with it.
For example, the people I know who are develo
What does anyone think about donating the dojo plugin to codehaus? I think
it's a better idea than letting the code go stale. You could even try
donating to the dojotoolkit project.
Paul
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for Musachy's suggestion, and I'm
+1 for Musachy's suggestion, and I'm also at a point where I could
help with the implementation.
As to Ajax-enabling some of the tags, there are several tag-based Ajax
libraries out there that we could look at embedding or emulating. In
this case, we wouldn't be adopting a general-purpose Ajax lib
Dojo seems to get the most lip service, but I've seen persistence
reports that YUI has broader acceptance.
-Ted.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Tue, 7/22/08, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Isn't Dojo the defacto ajax standard on the w
Tapestry is using Dojo too [1].
I'm not developing any AJAX application so my comments could be
somewhat biased, but either the dojo toolkit is used or not in
upcoming S2 versions, I think it is still worthwhile providing easy to
use, good looking javascript/dhtml widgets to quickly solve form inp
--- On Tue, 7/22/08, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't Dojo the defacto ajax standard on the web?
In terms of deployments I'd put money on Prototype and/or jQuery. Not that it's
a large sample size, but I don't know *anybody* using Dojo outside of S2.
Dave
-
Isn't Dojo the defacto ajax standard on the web? I know there is no such
"certification" :-) but why deprecate something so popular? If anything, I
would spin off the project into Codehaus and let the world continue writing
it.
Paul
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there,
I'm encounting a request encoding problem using struts 2.
Users may be send urls mainly in two encodins: UTF-8 or GBK.
For Firefox, it will encode urls to UTF-8 before sending them to server, by
default.
For IE, it will leave urls as it is by default.
Anyway, the urls received by serve
--- On Tue, 7/22/08, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Dave also had a JQuery plugin somewhere, isn't that right?
I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of said project.
I started to convert the Dojo tags to jQuery and stopped again pretty quickly;
I only had with a sin
> You would have to start the tags from scratch.
Very optimistic ;-) Maybe than, the jQuery is a better option to start
from scratch..
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
You would have to start the tags from scratch.
musachy
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Lukasz Lenart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Disregarding what path we take, I think it is fairly obvious that the
>> Dojo plugin will end up unmaintained, that's why we should users know
>> that we do
I think Dave also had a JQuery plugin somewhere, isn't that right?
musachy
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:49 AM, alvins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 to remove.
>
> Valid points raised by all. I personally use JQuery in my daily life and
> have written my own tags to do these functions. I did prev
+1 to remove.
Valid points raised by all. I personally use JQuery in my daily life and
have written my own tags to do these functions. I did previously look at the
effort required to update the current tags to the latest dojo but it would
be very time consuming and far easier to start from scratc
2008/7/22 Yannick Haudry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually, referring to your last note, I was wondering if in this case
> (meaning Tiles2 without a plugin),
> can I still use Tiles definitions as Struts forward ?
No, but you can render your definition using the container directly,
with no forward.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/22 Yannick Haudry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> or would it be a better idea to consider migrating to struts2 where
>> all the efforts are
>> concentrated now ?
>
> It depends. If you are maintaining an old application,
2008/7/22 Yannick Haudry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> or would it be a better idea to consider migrating to struts2 where
> all the efforts are
> concentrated now ?
It depends. If you are maintaining an old application, then I suggest
to follow the Struts 1 way.
Otherwise, consider moving to another "mo
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/21 Yannick Haudry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Struts 1.3.9, Tiles 2.0.6 and struts-tiles2-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar plugin.
>
> This configuration does not seem compatible to me. You have to try
> with a snapshot of Struts 1
29 matches
Mail list logo
