That would be totally fine, but I doubt anyone would be interested in Dojo 0.4.3 at this point.
musachy On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What does anyone think about donating the dojo plugin to codehaus? I think > it's a better idea than letting the code go stale. You could even try > donating to the dojotoolkit project. > > Paul > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +1 for Musachy's suggestion, and I'm also at a point where I could >> help with the implementation. >> >> As to Ajax-enabling some of the tags, there are several tag-based Ajax >> libraries out there that we could look at embedding or emulating. In >> this case, we wouldn't be adopting a general-purpose Ajax library, but >> special-purpose scripts designed to be used with tags. >> >> * Ajax Tags - http://ajaxtags.sourceforge.net >> * Prize Tags - http://jenkov.com/prizetags/index.html >> * JSON-taglib - http://json-taglib.sourceforge.net/ >> * AjaxParts Taglib - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net/ >> >> Has anyone had good or bad experiences with tag-based libraries like these? >> >> -Ted. >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > I am not sure about that approach. On one hand it is very "strutsish", >> > in that is supports many ways of doing the same thing, and provides >> > ways to extend what is provided, on the other hand, I think we should >> > learn from other frameworks and just don't give users that many >> > options, for they can be confusing, and frustrating when there is not >> > enough documentation. >> > >> > Looking at ajax, and the ajax tags I think we have 2 kind of users: >> > the power users, they won't use the ajax tag at all, unless they are >> > doing something extremely simple. the beginners: they will use the >> > ajax tags out of the box. When the beginners need to do something that >> > is not provided by the tags out of the box, they start hacking away, >> > and end up dumping the tags. So our target is the beginners, and they >> > don't want customization, they just want to drop a few tags on their >> > jsps and get it working. Based on that, I think we should either: >> > don't provide any ajax tags at all, or just provide a very limited set >> > of tags (like what Jeromy listed) with very little functionality to >> > cover simple use cases, and use a reliable and simple framework for >> > the implementation. >> > >> > Disregarding what path we take, I think it is fairly obvious that the >> > Dojo plugin will end up unmaintained, that's why we should users know >> > that we do not plan on upgrading from 0.4.3. >> > >> > musachy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
