+1 to your idea of removing from default stack.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Rainer Hermanns wrote:
> You are right, the builtin profiling support is not what someone will
> use to satisfy professional requirements.
> However, for some it might be quite useful as it is now.
> What I would sug
+1
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I think the JSON plugin is ready to be moved to trunk, here is my +1.
>
>
> musachy
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> -
> To unsub
+1
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> We have talked like 276 times about bringing the json plugin in, the
> reason we were not able to do it before was because one of the main
> contributors is not a struts committer and didn't have a CLA in file
> either. I asked him to
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >
> > big +1 for it. The FileManager problems + conversion problem in xwork
> >> are annoying. We need to get an xwork release first, and go over Jira
> >> and tag anything important for 2.1.7.
> >>
> &
I'm curious what others are thinking about rolling a 2.1.7 release. I think
there have been enough little "gotchas" from the 2.1.6 release that have
been fixed that we should consider rolling a 2.1.7 release soon.
Thoughts?
+2
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> Does anyone have any objection to us moving the JSON result type into
> core? It seems to me that it is a good candidate for a core result
> type and I think it would also show that we are striving to provide
> AJAX support. The main
I don't know if any plugging mechanism for themes has been discussed. Please
send us your thoughts.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Obinna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know if there's a 'recommended' way of extending the
> javatemplates theme.
> I've been using the default freemarker templates a
Great work!
I think it would be good if we linked to the zone from the Struts website
under the developer section. That way we have one central place to go to
find all this stuff. I know I tend to lose track of these things as there
all in my older emails.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Wes Wa
Nice work! Looks good to me.
Thanks for tackling this.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> So, I have the builds running and publishing (which, if people are
> satisfied,
> could obsolete James' nightly scripts).
>
> Please take a look at the docs I wrote. It provides inf
tch sitting on my machine "jsonplugin4struts21.patch" that's
> probably linked to one of the issues in the bug tracker.
>
>
> On 15/01/2009, at 7:54 AM, James Holmes wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks. I am investigating the issues now and will bump the POM to 0.33
>> as part of
ree to
> update it to 2.1. Some of the tests will fail to compile with minor
> errors, Wes attached a patch here:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/jsonplugin/issues/detail?id=64
>
> regards
> musachy
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:10 PM, James Holmes
> wrote:
> > Hey
Hey Musachy,
I'm trying to upgrade our production apps to Struts 2.1.6 and am running
into issues with the JSON plugin over at Google Code. Are you using the
plugin on any apps?
I wanted to check with you before I upgraded the JSON plugin POM to Struts
2.1.6. Doing so will break backward compatib
Hell yeah! I've already said it, but I'll say it again.
Musachy is the man!
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> Really, we owe him a lot for this release.
>
> What can we do?
>
> Dave
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e
+1
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Wes noticed the "Recent Threads" in
> http://struts.apache.org/index.html is way out of date. I think we
> should get rid of it, as it makes the project look bad if not updated,
> and they are never updated. Anyone wants to keep this
+1 GA that is!
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:10 PM, James Holmes wrote:
> +1
>
> You da man!
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>
>> Release notes:
>> * [http://struts.
+1
You da man!
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repos
+1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> Twice now on the user list there have been questions about unreleased
> Struts 2.1 versions.
>
> Unfortunately, the first hit for 'Struts 2' is the
> http://struts.apache.org/2.x *draft* docs index page, and that's how
> they're finding it
+1 for 2.1.5 build.
Thanks for tirelessly working to get a 2.1 GA release out!
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> yes, the bug is in ServletUrlRenderer which should pass the whole
> "action" to the url builder helper, instead of just the "actionName".
> It is fixed on trun
+1 to shut down.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> I'd be fine with shutting it down.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
> > Is anyone still using the Jive forum interface to the mailing lists?
> > We're getting spam posted th
Fair enough. I agree. Does that mean we'll fix and roll a 2.1.4?
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I am downgrading my vote to:
>
> +1 Leave at test build
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2937 for details.
> Thanks Al, for testing and reporting.
> musac
+1 for not delaying the release of 2.1 for something we normally don't vote
for.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Thinking process: well, this is a build artifact which is not even
> part of the distribution, and we already have +4 votes, do we really
> need to wait 3 da
+1 GA
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3.
>
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave a
+1
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I am going to merge the "release" branch into trunk and move the
> remaining open tickets (none of them are blockers, or that important
> actually) to 2.1.4, and then try to make a release tonight. This is my
> first time so sit tight
he tricky bits. Of course, being open source, I'd be
> > happy for 3 out of the 4 :)
> >
> > Don
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:35 PM, James Holmes
> wrote:
> >> In my opinion the Java-tags should ultimately become the default in say
> 2.2
> >>
In my opinion the Java-tags should ultimately become the default in say 2.2
or 2.3, but for now they should be a "supported, experimental" plugin
packaged with core. I say that because I think it's a little early to have
them replace the time-tested FreeMarker-based tags. If we can get them out
in
+1 and agree with Dave on moving the Dojo stuff into a plugin that is hosted
somewhere else and can be maintained by more people.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Dave Newton wrote:
> --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > We have talked about this Ad nauseam, and it is obvious that
>
++1
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> As mentioned on the other thread I's like to propose to move the java
> tags out of the sandbox into the core plugins bundled with the
> distribution, so they will be part of the 2.1 release.
>
> here is +1
>
> musachy
> --
> "Hey you
I'm not using either of those myself. We can always move the tickets to a
later release if need be. I wouldn't let the Tiles and Portlet tickets hold
up a 2.1.3 release. I just assigned what I thought were bug tickets to
2.1.3. Anything that was a feature, I assigned to Future.
On Fri, Dec 19, 200
Sounds good to me!
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > Do we need a formal vote on this?
> >
>
> I don't think we need a vote, more like a consensus (see? I am
> learning!), which we seem to have. We can have it in 2.1 as an
> experimental feature, like we usually do. I w
+1 for getting it out of the sandbox. Unfortunately I haven't had any time
to benchmark yet.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I committed a bunch of fixes, it is starting to shape up. Has anyone
> benchmark it so far?
>
> //with convention out of the sandbox, soon I wil
I'd like to test them and think this is a huge opportunity for Struts 2. I
am, however, surprised that you're only seeing a 30% improvement. I would
have thought it would have been orders of magnitude better. I know your
profiling is probably rudimentary at this point and the code hasn't been
tuned
+1
Let's get 2.1 to GA!
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The Multiple Unknown Handlers patch was merged into xwork and struts
> trunks. Now we can move convention plugin out of the sanbox. Last call
> for objections :) (2.1 build coming soon)
>
> musachy
>
> On Wed, No
> > thanks James, Struts 2 Jira needs some serious love at the moment.
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> Just wanted to give a heads up that I'm going through and trying to
> u
Plus I actually like getting the emails and I think having them come to the
dev list has prodded some folks to help clear the tickets out.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:33 PM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tell me again how do that? I don't recall.
>
>
> On Fri,
Just wanted to give a heads up that I'm going through and trying to update
the Jire tickets in the Unscheduled queue. If I make and update to a ticket
that you don't agree with, feel free to change.
James
[X] General Availability (GA).
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X] General Availability (GA). Ditto.
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [X] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > Niall
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 30,
AM, Wes Wannemacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Was 2.1.2 a BETA?
>
> -Wes
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:53 AM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > It looks like we're almost there! Musachy is killing it!
> >
> > From what I can tell the onl
It looks like we're almost there! Musachy is killing it!
>From what I can tell the only real outstanding issue left for the 2.1.3
release is:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2197
That said, what is the plan to get 2.1 to GA? Are we going to close out the
last 2 or 3 2.1.3 bugs and mak
+1
I think this is a great idea.
The easier the path of migration from S1 to S2, the more people will
continue to use Struts.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am happy to announce that I moved a little closer at integrating
> Struts 1 and 2 seamlessl
+1
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody care if I change the default to "none"? I'm tired of people
> complaining about it because reading the documentation is too hard.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
+1.
I'd rather us not lose the AJAX tags, but rather implement with something
more lightweight like Prototype, jQuery, or similar that's much easier to
work with.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With all the problems/questions and time that the ajax
+1 sounds like a good plan to me.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rainer, if you could release XW 2.0.6, then the Websphere guys should be
> able to manually fix their deployments until a 2.0.12 is out. 2.0.11.2
> still fixes the security issue and could b
Seems like a reasonable request to me.
The best way to get these types of enhancements incorporated is to open up a
JIRA ticket and attach a patch file.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Struts Two <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using struts 2.0.11.1 and I just realized that you can not
> dynam
http://blogs.sun.com/rlubke/entry/jsf_2_0_new_feature2
I like it. This is one of the features of RoR that I really found useful.
Anyone else had thoughts of doing something like this for Struts 2?
Beast
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> James Holmes wrote:
>
>> +2
>>
>> Dojo is a best. I'm all for something lighter like jQuery, Prototype, etc.
>>
>>
> "Dojo is a best"? Did you mea
Don, we can close out WW-2132 once you have some time to up the Struts
Annotations dependency.
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2132
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Great Struts Bug Hunt is progressing nicely, with 50 issues closed
> already.
Yes, beast is what I was going for. Google mail needs auto spell and grammar
checking instead of requiring you to manually invoke it...
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should that be "Dojo is a beast"?
>
> It is friday isn'
+2
Dojo is a best. I'm all for something lighter like jQuery, Prototype, etc.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Deprecate the dojo plugin and allow users to work directly with
> any ajax framework
>
>
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
>> So many dojo issues...
>>
> Rainer
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> the current build from trunk is broken. There are failing tests:
> >> http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/STRUTS-MAIN-843
> >>
> >> @James Holmes: Since you commited the latest fixes, could you please
&g
.com/browse/STRUTS-MAIN-843
>
> @James Holmes: Since you commited the latest fixes, could you please have a
> look at the failing unit tests, thanks :)
>
> cheers,
> Rainer
>
>
>
>
> Rainer Hermanns
> aixcept
> Mariahilfstraße 9
> 52062 Aachen - Germany
> w:
+2
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I officially declare the Struts 2.1 bug hunting season open! In order
> to ensure a high-quality 2.1 GA release, I've gone through the tickets
> and assigned most open bugs to the 2.1.3 version:
>
>
> https://issues.apac
Not sure why there is a difference. Perhaps there's good reason? But if not,
I'm in favor of consistency and making things the same.
Good catch.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any reason why the default result type in struts.xml is
> ServletDispa
2008 at 9:52 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah I was validating it, and it was complaining about the description
> and the value of tlib-version
>
> musachy
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
It's all tags that have a nested element. I am working on the
fix to the annotations processor and will have it checked in shortly.
You can view the XML Schema for tag libraries here:
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd
James
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Musachy Barro
Sounds good to me. If there's a use for it and it's simply a configurable
option, why not.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:29 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on some code which returns a result stream which shouldn't be
> cached. I've modded the StreamResult class to add an "allow
+1
I just made a fix (patch) for the includeProperties feature of the JSON
plugin would have committed it myself if it were part of the S2 codebase. I
personally thing we should bring this plugin into the main Struts 2 project.
James
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTEC
+1
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With 2.1.2 beta out the door, I think it is time we consider the
> branch feature-complete, which means our focus should now be on
> working out the bugs so we can get a stable, GA-quality 2.1.x release
> ASAP.
>
> I'm goi
Sounds good to me. I'm all for better performance.
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stating new thread for this topic. Don suggested to use this classpath
> scanner:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/trunk/xbean-finder/
>
> in xwork an
Excellent news!
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.2 vote has passed with the following results:
>
> +1 Beta: 5 binding, three non-binding
> +1 Beta: 1 binding
>
> I'm moving the release files over to the mirrors now and will announce
> the p
+1 on all 3 of Dusty's recommendations and on the notion of having one way
of doing things. Often times flexibility leads to confusion. All you have to
do is look at Perl for proof of that.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:30 AM, dusty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a largish app that I wrote wi
They get mailed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/editing-the-documentation.html
> "Confluence sends to the developers mailing list a daily summary of
> changes, including new comments."
>
> Does thi
ly
> love to have it.
>
> - Original Message - From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List"
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:58 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] upgrade Struts 2.1.x FreeMarker dependency to 2.3.13
>
>
>
Struts Developers List"
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] upgrade Struts 2.1.x FreeMarker dependency to 2.3.13
>
>
>
> +1
>>
>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
+1
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Currently Struts 2.1.x depends on FreeMarker 2.3.12. I propose to upgrade
> the dependency to 2.3.13 to take advantage of performance improvements and
> bug fixes.
>
> See this link for
Currently Struts 2.1.x depends on FreeMarker 2.3.12. I propose to upgrade
the dependency to 2.3.13 to take advantage of performance improvements and
bug fixes.
See this link for release notes:
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/versions_2_3_13.html
[ ] Yes, upgrade the dependency to 2.3.13
[
Anyone have any ideas for what they'd like to see in a Struts 2 Eclipse
plugin?
I'm thinking of developing a follow up to Struts Console that is
specifically targeted at Struts 2 and Eclipse.
With the move to convention over configuration it seems that a GUI interface
to the struts.xml config fil
+0
Personally, I'd like to see the the CodeBehind, Zero-Config, Convention and
Rest plugins better integrated and the overlap reduced. Right now there are
multiple ways to skin the same cat and that can be confusing to new and
experienced users alike. The question they will likely have is: Which
p
+1
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another thing is that the convention plugin is using
> java.util.logging.*. I think we should stick to what we have in core
> and everywhere else.
>
> musachy
>
+1
[X] Beta
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.2 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-212.html
>
> Distribution:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.2/
>
> Maven 2 staging
+1
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As more and more companies start using open source software, many,
> like mine, are looking for ways to give back to the community. They
> want a way to contribute and ensure their contribution will be noticed
> and apprec
+1
Sent via BlackBerry.
-Original Message-
From: "Wes Wannemacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:57:09
To:"Struts Developers List"
Subject: Adding OGNL section to FAQ
Would anyone be opposed to adding an OGNL section to the FAQ in the
main Wiki? There are always ques
+1
-Original Message-
From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:39 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [s2] Struts head tag KILLS (> 10s) page load time
Hmm...more info can be found here: http://dojo.jot.com/FAQ#Performance
I wonder if we sho
what will the next release
>of Struts require?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Matt
>
>On 9/24/07, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure if Don is planning to change the EL mechanism or just *make it
>> possible" to change the mechanism.
>>
>>
&
I'm not sure if Don is planning to change the EL mechanism or just *make it
possible" to change the mechanism.
On Mon Sep 24 16:42 , 'Matt Raible' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>Is it worth trying to fix this issue (non-existent properties not
>reported) if the underlying EL mechanism is going to c
Yes, true and it may be a moot point soon if Don Brown is able to get JSP EL
working as the underlying EL engine of Struts 2.
On Mon Sep 24 15:48 , 'Matt Raible' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>+1 GA - all tests pass in AppFuse.
>
>The good news about removing the ability of doing ${...} in Struts
>t
ns with Struts 2 tags will
>no longer work as of this release.
>
>
>I'm assuming this means that ${...} can't be used in Struts 2 tag
>attributes anymore?
>
>Matt
>
>On 9/24/07, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The Struts 2.0.11 test build is now a
The Struts 2.0.11 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-2011.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.11/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.11/m2-staging-repositor
James Mitchell and I both live in Atlanta so we should be around.
Sent via BlackBerry.
-Original Message-
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:26:11
To:"Struts Developers List"
Subject: ApacheCon Roll Call
I was just wondering who was planning on attendin
I created the release notes for the Struts 2.0.11 release. I'm not sure I did
it correctly though since 2.0.10 never saw the light of day. How do we
handle the scenario where this release is simply fixes to the previous release
that had all of the changes in it?
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluen
email notification. That way 100 tickets don't produce 100 emails.
>
>
>
>Paul
>
>
>
>On 9/18/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>
>> On 9/18/07, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > + Create 2.0.11 release notes? (I
So far:
+ I fixed the issue with Component.determineActionUrl()
+ I setup a 2.0.12 release in JIRA
+ I moved all of the tickets in JIRA that were assigned to 2.0.11 to 2.0.12
+ I cleared up the issue/concern about the escapeAmp attribute
(https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2190)
What'
I fixed the problem on the 2.0.X branch. Not sure if that was the right place to
do it, but it's done.
I created this issue when I worked on some tickets for the 2.0.10 release. At
the
time I overlooked the fact that it was a protected method and I was changing the
API. My bad. Everything should
The Struts 2.0.10 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-2010.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.10/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.10/m2-staging-repositor
I meant to respond to this sooner, but forgot. Your last email reminded me.
This is great news. Perhaps now is the time to implement the OGNL 2.7
performance enhancements. From what I could make of following some threads
(here and on TheServerSide.com) MVEL is not necessarily any faster than OGNL
Seems fine to me, but you should put a note on the page highlighting the fact
that the documentation is for the 2.1 version so that users are not confused.
On Mon Sep 10 12:33 , 'Musachy Barroso' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>Is it ok to update the tag reference for the ajax tags on the wiki,
>and
Sounds good!
On Mon Sep 10 9:33 , 'Ted Husted' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>I got distracted last night, but I'll give it another try tonight.
>
>On 9/5/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, if everyone is good to go on Struts 2.0.10, I could roll it Sunday
>> night (9 Sep).
>>
>> -Ted.
+1
Ted, I'm with you 100%. James Mitchell and Bill Siggelkow have been preaching to
me about Rails for 6 months now and I have finally taken the time to dig in
deeper. And they are right! It has some amazing concepts. I can't wait to see
how
we can evolve Struts towards achieving some of the exce
Nice work!
I've just started working on a Rails app to get more familiar with the Rails
framework and I must say I like the Rails "routing" scheme a lot! The closer
we can get to the way Rails does things, the better we are in my opinion.
James
-Original Message-
From: Don Brown [mailto:
Didn't you commit fixes for this on Struts_2_0_X branch? When you closed the
ticket the fix version changed. Wasn't sure if that was on accident or not.
James
-Original Message-
From: Musachy Barroso (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
What should we do? I'm in favor of rolling a 2.0.10 beta release and a 2.1 beta
release. The 2.0.10 beta would get the security fix out and allow users to get
an
incremental upgrade with low risk. The 2.1 beta would allow users to start
testing the new 2.1 features.
2.0.10 is virtually ready to g
What version of Struts 2 are you trying this against?
On Wed Aug 22 15:58 , mraible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
>If I replace ognl-2.6.11.jar with ognl-2.7.jar, I get the following error
>when Struts starts up:
>
>Exception starting filter struts2
>java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javassist/Class
I'm in favor of changing the dependency in Struts 2.1 from OGNL 2.6.1 to 2.7.
This would better position us once we work on updating the Struts 2/XWork code
to
take advantage of the performance improvements.
I'm happy to make POM changes if everyone agrees.
James
On Wed Aug 22 14:38 , Dale New
I am also using 2.1 and it is working great for me.
On Wed Aug 22 14:18 , 'Musachy Barroso' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>I'm using 2.1 on development, and it is working fine so far.
>
>musachy
>
>On 8/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 8/22/07, Rene Gielen [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1
Portlet support has successfully moved to a plugin. Ajax/Dojo has been
separated.
We don't want Struts 2.1 to take as long as Struts 1.1 did. Let's roll a beta!
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Husted
Sent: Tuesday,
Oooh, good thinking! I mean on the minimum version check thing.
On Tue Aug 21 14:38 , 'Ted Husted' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>On 8/21/07, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For the plugins kept in s2, the other change I would like to see is
>> independent life cycles. If the code has not
+1 for keeping the Portlet plugin in the core Struts 2 distribution and
project. Nils-H is actively maintaining it and I am
interested in maintaining it as well.
James
On Tue Aug 21 1:43 , 'Nils-Helge Garli' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>I couldn't fint the portlet plugin mentioned on the list
+1 for keeping the Spring module at the Struts project.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 10:18 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [S2] [2.1.x] Bundled Plugins
I disagree with moving the Spring plugin outside of the cor
+1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Ajax Theme
So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed
between 2.0.x an
This commit was causing problems for me because of this code:
@Inject("struts.portlet.dispatcherServletName")
public void setDispatcherServletName(String dispatcherServletName) {
this.dispatcherServletName = dispatcherServletName;
}
There was not a "struts.
or Future.
There were two tickets with patches and no Fix Version, so I set them
to 2.0.10 for now (WW-2058 and WW-2073).
Personally, I believe it's vital that we pay special attention to
tickets with a patch, so as to encourage additional contributions from
the wider community.
-Ted.
On
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
