Hi all... thought I'd go right to the source... is there an ETA for 1.3 being
released? I mean, I know it's available now, but I'm talking about an actual,
official release of some sort (beta, GA, whatever). Thanks!
-
To unsubs
Don Brown said:
> 1. The chain logic should be separate from the application logic, which
> could, however, use common-chain. I'm fine with using a chain command
> to replace Action, as long as it can be made clear the line between the
> two processes. One defines how all requests should be pro
That makes sense, cloning as Niall does sound right (shucks, had it working and
done!).
Simple question: how should the mapping be cloned? I mean, clearly when I
override processMapping() I'll just call the super version and then clone what
I recieve and return that, but how should I literally
Yep, I found that out in short order. My eMail client is driving me nuts
today, some messages are going through right away, some are delayed 10-15
minutes. You'll probably see the other messages preceeding this one where I
found that out, tossed some ideas around and finally settled on a solut
Excellent point! It's done.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
On Wed, February 2, 2005 2:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> i might put that freeze in a finally block, if you're gonna do something
> nasty,
> better make sure you
GOT IT!
But, this might be the worst piece of hackery I've ever done. Check it out...
Joe's last response spurred me to realize that if I could override the input
field of the ActionMapping, I could do what I want. As I thought,
processPreprocess() fires before processValidate(), which means
On Wed, February 2, 2005 1:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Actually, now you've stimulated a though in me! :)
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but processPreprocess() fires BEFORE
> processValidate(), correct? In that case, since I can in fact determine
> the input after processPreprocess() fires, I
My mail client is flaking out again, so I don't think this went through
the first time. This should be read BEFORE my post about confusing myself,
otherwise it'll likely be YOU who is confused :)
GOT IT!
But, this might be the worst piece of hackery I've ever done. Check it out...
> The problem as I discovered is that I can't just call setInput() in
> processValidate() because the configuration is frozen at that point. And,
> since the RequestProcessor isn't in the same package as ActionConfig (where >
> setInput() is found), I couldn't call setInput() since it's protect
On Wed, February 2, 2005 1:10 pm, Joe Germuska said:
> This actually stimulated another thought. Perhaps instead of
> overriding process validate, you could arrange to have your
> ActionMappings dynamically instantiated with the correct value for
> "input" (assuming that you can know it before you
Nothing to excuse Paul! Thanks for being "at the ready" to help in any case :)
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
On Wed, February 2, 2005 1:09 pm, Benedict, Paul C said:
> Frank,
>
> Excuse my ignorance then :) Your explanatio
You are referring to the CoR-based Struts build, correct Joe? If not, I'm not
seeing that class in the 1.1 javadocs.
If your talking CoR as I think you are though, I haven't gotten that far yet :)
I'm trying to get this to a point of equillibrium that I'm happy with based on
the current codeb
Are you familiar with my project Paul? If not, I'll briefly explain
(otherwise, just skip to the third paragraph)...
It is a project that allows Actions to be exposed as Web Services with no
changes to the existing code. All a developer has to do is add a plug-in, and
optionally a new webserv
Well, I clearly didn't look hard enough :) Yep, that's pretty much exactly
what I was thinking of... I think that SimpleAction idea is a subset of this
anyway, so it's superfluous.
Well, at least I know it was a good idea :) Sorry to have used list bandwidth
for nothing.
--
Frank W. Zammett
Good morning all... I had a thought bouncing around in my head on the drive in
(a rather extended drive due to the weather from this weekend!), and I wanted
to bring it up here and see if (a) it's been done already and/or (b) anyone
thinks it's an interesting idea worth pursuing...
It occurred
On Thu, January 6, 2005 1:30 pm, Ted Husted said:
> I'd say JSF and ASPX are similar in the same way that Struts and WebWorks
> and Maverick are similar. The broad strokes of the architectures resonate,
> but there are significant differences in the implementation details.
True enough, and it's in
I'll be honest... I usually ignore the commit messages. Since none of *my*
proposals have made it in yet, why should I care what *you* guys do?!? (tongue
FIRMLY in cheek here, trying to be funny... probably not succeeding!)
Tell you what... since the fact is that I could have answered my own qu
How did you decide to fix it Martin? Just out of curiosity.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
On Thu, January 6, 2005 1:06 pm, Martin Cooper said:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:31:34 -0600, Lane, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
Heh... ironically, a minute or so after I replied, that thought occurred to me,
but I got pulled away and didn't get a chance to go back and look. You are of
course right.
I suppose the simplest answer is just make copy() non-static. Otherwise,
assuming MyDownloadAction is the extended versio
I agree. Line 138 should read:
byte[] buffer = new byte[getBufferSize()];
(Actually, that looks a bit bizarre... can you use a method call to specify an
array size? Yes, I just tried a test app, seems you can.)
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
ht
Just checking... I know it's the holidays and all, but it's been a couple of
days and no one posted any comment (unless I missed it).
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Woops, that's not J2SE 5.0-compatible... I have to get out of the habit of
using the variable name enum for enumerations :) No big deal, I'll fix it if
this is used for anythign.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
On Tue, Dece
I recently had a need to determine the size of a user's current session, and I
didn't find any available option, so I rolled my own. If I in fact didn't miss
something and this really doesn't exist somewhere already, then I'd like to
offer it up for inclusion in the struts.utils package. I can
I do have some experience with Rhino, I actually integrated it into DataVision a few
weeks ago for Javascript formula support (new release coming at some point!). I
hadn't considered it for this... I'll have to think about it a bit. Off the top of my
head it seems like it might be a little hea
Craig (and everyone else), based on what you mentioned on the User's list, I'd like to
make the following proposal, get some feedback from everyone and go off and work on
it... I prefer getting at least some level of buy-in from you guys before I spend any
time on it...
The basic idea is being
I realize I'm not on the committee, but as an outside observer looking at this from a
purely project management-based perspective, I hope you won't view me adding my voice
here are speaking out of turn or sticking my nose in where it doesn't belong...
The terminology becomes important in the sam
Another fair point. :)
Well, that's the reason I put the idea out there... I can't think of every possible
angle to look at it from... If I thought I could, I wouldn't need to solicit opinions
in the first place.
Kind of depressing though... I'm trying to contribute, but so far all my ideas hav
Hello all...
I find myself all the time overloading toString() of my ActionForms for debugging
purposes, so I can easily dump the current state of the object. I had been doing this
for each ActionForm class, specifically for it, but it ocurrs to me that a
general-purpose reflection-based appr
28 matches
Mail list logo
