To move it under trunk.
musachy
On 3/15/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To clarify, are we talking about moving the annotations project under the
struts2/trunk directory or integrating the Java and APT code into
core? If
the former, I'm all for it, if the latter, I vote against it as
To clarify, are we talking about moving the annotations project under the
struts2/trunk directory or integrating the Java and APT code into core? If
the former, I'm all for it, if the latter, I vote against it as I'd like to
keep core as focused as possible.
Don
On 3/14/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL
Basically I'm convinced that annotations is an independent project in
theory, but currently we have only two realistic usecases:
1) build s2 distribution
2) let users of s2 extend /customize existing s2 tags or add custom tags
in their own projects
Both usecases can be served with annotations
+1 on the merge
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Seems like bringing them in would make sense, especially if the people who are
managing them say so. Since I don't experience the pain, I certainly can't vote
-1. So I'm a +0-1 :)
-
Pos
Seems like bringing them in would make sense, especially if the people who are
managing them say so. Since I don't experience the pain, I certainly can't vote
-1. So I'm a +0-1 :)
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensympho
Yeah, while I know there are good reasons to keep annotations and the
archetypes outside the struts 2 codebase, from a pragmatic standpoint, I'd
also like to bring them back in. Sure, the annotations could be useful for
other projects, but until anyone signs up to do to the work, I just don't
see
These are the annotations we are using to generate the tld for the tags
(StrutsTagAnnotation, StrutsTagAttributeAnnotation)
regards
musachy
On 3/13/07, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ted,
What "annotations" are we talking about? The annotations used for
configuration, or somethin
Ted,
What "annotations" are we talking about? The annotations used for
configuration, or something else? Pardon my ignorance on this, I just want
clarification.
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?
+1
It should be easy for the people that do the heavy lifting of developing this
great framework.
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=70084&messageID=131939#131939
--
Well, it isn't really specific to Struts in anyway, and we wrote it because
there wasn't anything else to do the job (xdoclet needed to be patched If I
remember right). At the end is not big deal, it is just 4 classes anyway :)
musachy
On 3/12/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/
On 3/12/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I really wish is that there was some external project doing
this(which
is supposed to be a fairly common task) so we wouldn't have to maintain
it,
but if we are going to keep it, I'd rather have it as part of the
distribution.
Why wo
What I really wish is that there was some external project doing this(which
is supposed to be a fairly common task) so we wouldn't have to maintain it,
but if we are going to keep it, I'd rather have it as part of the
distribution.
musachy
On 3/12/07, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd prefer that it be part of the distribution. Having it separate
just seems to add complexity to the build and I'm sure to the release
process.
Just my 2 cents.
--
James Mitchell
On Mar 12, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
Under the Apache License, anyone who wanted to do that w
Under the Apache License, anyone who wanted to do that would be free
to do so. It's just a matter of changing the product name, and
following the other provisions of the license.
But, that doesn't solve the problem, it just changes the venue. If
there's anyone who is ready, willing, and able to r
After the changes I just added, I don't think annotations will change much
from now on, if any. We could set it up somewhere else (googlecode?) and
avoid both the subproject and the multiple release problems.
musachy
On 3/12/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/11/07, Ted Husted <
On 3/11/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Annotations was originally setup as a separate JAR with an independent
version so as to encourage reuse. However, until other product
indicate an interest in using Annotaitons and participating in its
development, managing a separate release proc
Annotations was originally setup as a separate JAR with an independent
version so as to encourage reuse. However, until other product
indicate an interest in using Annotaitons and participating in its
development, managing a separate release process provides no tangible
benefit. Therefore, it's pr
17 matches
Mail list logo
