2010/1/18 Wes Wannemacher :
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>
>> (In the future the archetypes could be released together, it just puts
>> an additional burden on the RM to deal with extra artifacts and the
>> devs to test them in addition to the rest of the release. I wou
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
> (In the future the archetypes could be released together, it just puts
> an additional burden on the RM to deal with extra artifacts and the
> devs to test them in addition to the rest of the release. I would not
> hold these up waiting for
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> In middle of nowhere :P
>
> I've been thinking to cancel that vote, move archetypes into
> struts2/trunk and make a new release of Struts 2 with Xwork core also.
> Can be?
I thought you provided the signatures already? You might want to
st
I think I have seen some arguments of why the archetypes should be
outside the s2 trunk, but I can really remember why. As to getting a
s2 release with xwork, we might still be a bit far from that.
musachy
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2010/1/17 Martin Cooper :
>> Where
2010/1/17 Martin Cooper :
> Where are we on this? Lukasz, are you going to be able to kick off a
> new vote after we have all of the proper artifacts in place?
In middle of nowhere :P
I've been thinking to cancel that vote, move archetypes into
struts2/trunk and make a new release of Struts 2 wit
Where are we on this? Lukasz, are you going to be able to kick off a
new vote after we have all of the proper artifacts in place?
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2010/1/6 Frans Thamura :
>> Lukasz, can u share, where is the source code of your archetype?
cool
thx..
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2010/1/6 Frans Thamura :
>> Lukasz, can u share, where is the source code of your archetype?
>>
>> so we can see the source
>
> I have a local copy of archetypes, the clean copy that was used for
> release. I didn't clean it up
2010/1/6 Frans Thamura :
> Lukasz, can u share, where is the source code of your archetype?
>
> so we can see the source
I have a local copy of archetypes, the clean copy that was used for
release. I didn't clean it up after all, so I was able to generate all
missing files.
I can compress it and p
Lukasz, can u share, where is the source code of your archetype?
so we can see the source
F
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2010/1/6 Lukasz Lenart :
>> I verified the signatures and hashes on my second PC at work -
>> everything is ok. I will prepare the rest.
>
> I did
2010/1/6 Lukasz Lenart :
> I verified the signatures and hashes on my second PC at work -
> everything is ok. I will prepare the rest.
I did the rest and double-checked everything, so I think the law can
be satisfied ;-)
Regartds
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
http://javarsovia.pl
---
2010/1/5 Lukasz Lenart :
> Wendy
> Could you check struts2-archetype-portlet?
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.8.1/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/struts/struts2-archetype-portlet/2.1.8.1/
I verified the signatures and hashes on my second PC at work -
everything is ok. I will prepare
Wendy
Could you check struts2-archetype-portlet?
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.8.1/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/struts/struts2-archetype-portlet/2.1.8.1/
Thanks in advance
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
http://javarsovia.pl
-
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> You mean the checksums that you download from the same
> potentially-corrupted server? Good plan! :-p
>
No, I mean the checksums sitting on your own hard drive right next to
the rest of the files generated during the release process.
I gue
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> [snip]
>> ... If you download the files, you have no way of knowing
>> if they are the same ones you put there...
>
> No way of knowing... except the checksums :)
You mean the checksu
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
[snip]
> ... If you download the files, you have no way of knowing
> if they are the same ones you put there...
No way of knowing... except the checksums :)
-Wes
--
Wes Wannemacher
Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc.
Need Training? Struts, Spring,
2010/1/5 Martin Cooper :
> Do not do this. If you download the files, you have no way of knowing
> if they are the same ones you put there. They could have been
> corrupted, deliberately or otherwise, in the interim, and without
> signatures you cannot verify what you have (which is why we want the
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> you can download the files from the repo and sign it/generate
> checksums..but!..this happened before and there was a long discussion
> over if it was right or not and so on.
Do not do this. If you download the files, you have no way of kn
you can download the files from the repo and sign it/generate
checksums..but!..this happened before and there was a long discussion
over if it was right or not and so on. You can either:
1. sign the files/generate checksums locally and upload them
2. do the release again
I'd say #1, considering h
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2010/1/5 Wendy Smoak :
>> I just re-checked and there are still no .asc signature files in the
>> staging repo, so this cannot be released as-is.
>
> I found the problem - .asc files were only generated for
> struts2-archetype-plugin and strut
2010/1/5 Wendy Smoak :
> I just re-checked and there are still no .asc signature files in the
> staging repo, so this cannot be released as-is.
I found the problem - .asc files were only generated for
struts2-archetype-plugin and struts2-archetype-starter. The reset is
missing below entry in pom.x
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> As I understood, the Vote should be cancelled as only Musachy gave
> positive answer. I'm not a PMC so my vote doesn't count at the end. Am
> I right? Or should I wait?
I just re-checked and there are still no .asc signature files in the
sta
Hi,
As I understood, the Vote should be cancelled as only Musachy gave
positive answer. I'm not a PMC so my vote doesn't cunt at the end. Am
I right? Or should I wait?
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscri
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> Ok, so the bottom line is that we should release Struts2 with
> archetypes all together?
It's up to the release manager. I haven't advocated it in the past
because it puts extra work on the RM, but it could be done.
--
Wendy
---
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Wendy Smoak :
>> You need a minimum of three PMC member votes in order for it to be
>> released from Apache.
>
> Yes I know that, but what if we never accomplish that, should I wait
> forever or cancel vote?
>
>> I took a quick loo
2009/12/22 Wendy Smoak :
> You need a minimum of three PMC member votes in order for it to be
> released from Apache.
Yes I know that, but what if we never accomplish that, should I wait
forever or cancel vote?
> I took a quick look and it seems that the staging repo contains more
> than just the
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> Sixth days left and just one vote :-(
> Should I wait more (Christmas period) or should I suppose the vote pass?
You need a minimum of three PMC member votes in order for it to be
released from Apache.
I took a quick look and it seems that
Yeah, I plan to vote, but haven't had a chance to test, so please extend.
-Wes
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2009/12/17 Musachy Barroso :
>> +1 GA, they look good, thanks Lukasz for taking care of this.
>
> Sixth days left and just one vote :-(
> Should I wait more (Chr
2009/12/17 Musachy Barroso :
> +1 GA, they look good, thanks Lukasz for taking care of this.
Sixth days left and just one vote :-(
Should I wait more (Christmas period) or should I suppose the vote pass?
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
--
+1 GA, they look good, thanks Lukasz for taking care of this.
musachy
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> The Struts 2 Archetypes version 2.1.8.1 test build is now available.
> The following archetypes are ready for test:
> * struts2-archetype-blank
> * struts2-archetype-con
To simplify testing you can use below command:
mvn archetype:generate
-DarchetypeCatalog=http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.8.1/m2-staging-repository/
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2009/12/16 Lukasz Lenart :
> The Struts 2 Archetypes version 2.1.8.1 test build is now avai
The Struts 2 Archetypes version 2.1.8.1 test build is now available.
The following archetypes are ready for test:
* struts2-archetype-blank
* struts2-archetype-convention
* struts2-archetype-dbportlet
* struts2-archetype-plugin
* struts2-archetype-portlet
* struts2-archetype-starter
Release notes:
31 matches
Mail list logo
